Mille Lacs may get new walleye rules

  • Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 28, 2013 - 5:46 AM

Concerned about the walleye population, the DNR weighs its options. A ban on night fishing is one possibility.


The population of walleye is declining on Lake Mille Lacs, Minnesota’s most popular walleye lake, and the DNR, local businesses and anglers find themselves with few options.

Photo: DENNIS ANDERSON, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

– Some of the most restrictive fishing regulations Lake Mille Lacs anglers have seen are likely to be imposed this summer on the state’s most popular walleye lake to reduce the harvest.

Anglers could start the season with a 2-inch harvest slot and a two-fish bag limit, which might be increased later in the summer.

Local business owners said those tight restrictions were better than alternatives presented by Department of Natural Resources officials at a Wednesday night meeting near the lake.

Those alternatives included a possible ban on night fishing and restrictions on the use of live bait and certain hooks and jigs. DNR officials discussed the options with 60 residents, including two dozen members of the Mille Lacs Fisheries Input Group, a consortium of area resort owners, bait shops and other businesses.

Members strongly opposed a night fishing ban. “That’s probably 75 percent of our customers,” said Bill Eno, owner of Twin Pines Resort.

And they said an 18- to 20-inch harvest slot, meaning only walleyes in that size could be kept, with a two-fish bag limit to start the season was least objectionable of 33 alternatives the DNR offered.

Still, some said they feared businesses could be hurt by the restrictive regulations.

“We’ve already lost resorts,” said Tim Chapman of Chapman’s Mille Lacs Resort. “It will be tough.”

There was good news: The DNR is proposing to relax rules for smallmouth bass and northerns to perhaps reduce predation of smaller walleyes while also providing anglers with fish for the fry pan.

The DNR, local businesses and anglers find themselves with few options because they must reduce the walleye harvest. Concerned over the lake’s declining walleye population — the lowest in 40 years — state officials earlier this winter slashed the lake’s 2013 “safe” walleye harvest by sports anglers in half to 178,750 pounds. The quota for the eight Chippewa bands also was halved, to 71,250 pounds. That 250,000 pounds is the lowest safe harvest quota since the state and Chippewa bands established them in 1997.

A 2-inch harvest slot — possibly 18 to 20 inches — is likely to be the foundation of the new regulations. Anglers could only keep walleyes within that slot.

But DNR biologists estimate that tight harvest slot still would result in a walleye harvest, including hooking mortality, of around 200,000 pounds — well over the state’s allotment. (Hooking mortality is an estimate of the number of fish that die after being deep-hooked and released.)

“So we would need to add some other things to get us below our allocation to avoid a midseason regulation change,” said Tom Jones, DNR large-lake specialist.

If it looks like walleye harvest could exceed the state’s allotment, the DNR might have to reduce the bag limit to zero, meaning catch-and-release-only walleye fishing. He offered some ideas, including a ban on night fishing, an especially popular and lucrative activity for commercial boat launches.

In recent years, a month-long night ban began at 10 p.m. after the fishing opener. If a season-long night ban is imposed, it could begin at 8:30 p.m., Jones said.

Other possible options: Restrictions on the use of live bait, possibly during June and July, when hooking mortality is highest. Another option: requiring the use of circle hooks, and banning regular hooks or jigs, which could reduce mortality.

Members of the input group rejected those options.

Currently, four walleyes under 17 inches are allowed, with one fish over 28 inches.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Houston 1 FINAL
Miami 1
Philadelphia 1 FINAL
Minnesota 7
St. Louis 3 FINAL
Detroit 4
Baltimore - WP: T. Wilson 10 FINAL
NY Yankees - LP: S. Baker 2
Boston 9 FINAL
Tampa Bay 6
Toronto 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 8
Atlanta 5 FINAL
Toronto 3
Washington 2 FINAL
NY Mets 10
Chicago Cubs 5 FINAL
Cincinnati 9
San Diego 3 FINAL
Texas 2
San Francisco 9 FINAL
Seattle 8
Colorado 4 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 18
Cleveland 3 FINAL
Milwaukee 2
Oakland 10 FINAL
Chicago WSox 4
Los Angeles 5 FINAL
LA Angels 4
Kansas City 10 FINAL
Arizona 5
Atlanta 100 FINAL
Charlotte 115
New York 80 FINAL
Chicago 111
Golden State 108 FINAL
Milwaukee 95
Oklahoma City 89 FINAL
Utah 94
Denver 114 FINAL
Portland 120
Nashville 4 FINAL
Washington 3
Arizona 2 FINAL
Pittsburgh 3
San Jose 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 2
Anaheim 3 FINAL
NY Islanders 2
NY Rangers 2 FINAL
Boston 4
Tampa Bay 0 FINAL
Detroit 4
New Jersey 1 FINAL
Carolina 3
Florida 2 FINAL(OT)
Montreal 3
Ottawa 3 FINAL(OT)
Toronto 4
Los Angeles 1 FINAL
Minnesota 4
Columbus 4 FINAL
St. Louis 2
Buffalo 3 FINAL
Colorado 5
Dallas 4 FINAL(OT)
Vancouver 3
Arizona 78 FINAL
Wisconsin 85
Canisius 73 FINAL
Notre Dame 66 FINAL
Kentucky 68
San Jose 1 FINAL
New England 2
Orlando City 2 FINAL
Montreal 2
Los Angeles 0 FINAL
D.C. 1
Sporting Kansas City 1 FINAL
New York City 0
Red Bull New York 2 FINAL
Columbus 1
Portland 1 FINAL
Vancouver FC 2
Colorado 0 FINAL
Houston 0
Seattle 0 FINAL
FC Dallas 0
Texas 54 FINAL
(1) Connecticut 105
Dayton 82 FINAL
(8) Louisville 66
(16) Duke 55 FINAL
(4) Maryland 65
Gonzaga 69 FINAL
(6) Tennessee 73
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question