Mille Lacs may get new walleye rules

  • Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 28, 2013 - 5:46 AM

Concerned about the walleye population, the DNR weighs its options. A ban on night fishing is one possibility.


The population of walleye is declining on Lake Mille Lacs, Minnesota’s most popular walleye lake, and the DNR, local businesses and anglers find themselves with few options.

Photo: DENNIS ANDERSON, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

– Some of the most restrictive fishing regulations Lake Mille Lacs anglers have seen are likely to be imposed this summer on the state’s most popular walleye lake to reduce the harvest.

Anglers could start the season with a 2-inch harvest slot and a two-fish bag limit, which might be increased later in the summer.

Local business owners said those tight restrictions were better than alternatives presented by Department of Natural Resources officials at a Wednesday night meeting near the lake.

Those alternatives included a possible ban on night fishing and restrictions on the use of live bait and certain hooks and jigs. DNR officials discussed the options with 60 residents, including two dozen members of the Mille Lacs Fisheries Input Group, a consortium of area resort owners, bait shops and other businesses.

Members strongly opposed a night fishing ban. “That’s probably 75 percent of our customers,” said Bill Eno, owner of Twin Pines Resort.

And they said an 18- to 20-inch harvest slot, meaning only walleyes in that size could be kept, with a two-fish bag limit to start the season was least objectionable of 33 alternatives the DNR offered.

Still, some said they feared businesses could be hurt by the restrictive regulations.

“We’ve already lost resorts,” said Tim Chapman of Chapman’s Mille Lacs Resort. “It will be tough.”

There was good news: The DNR is proposing to relax rules for smallmouth bass and northerns to perhaps reduce predation of smaller walleyes while also providing anglers with fish for the fry pan.

The DNR, local businesses and anglers find themselves with few options because they must reduce the walleye harvest. Concerned over the lake’s declining walleye population — the lowest in 40 years — state officials earlier this winter slashed the lake’s 2013 “safe” walleye harvest by sports anglers in half to 178,750 pounds. The quota for the eight Chippewa bands also was halved, to 71,250 pounds. That 250,000 pounds is the lowest safe harvest quota since the state and Chippewa bands established them in 1997.

A 2-inch harvest slot — possibly 18 to 20 inches — is likely to be the foundation of the new regulations. Anglers could only keep walleyes within that slot.

But DNR biologists estimate that tight harvest slot still would result in a walleye harvest, including hooking mortality, of around 200,000 pounds — well over the state’s allotment. (Hooking mortality is an estimate of the number of fish that die after being deep-hooked and released.)

“So we would need to add some other things to get us below our allocation to avoid a midseason regulation change,” said Tom Jones, DNR large-lake specialist.

If it looks like walleye harvest could exceed the state’s allotment, the DNR might have to reduce the bag limit to zero, meaning catch-and-release-only walleye fishing. He offered some ideas, including a ban on night fishing, an especially popular and lucrative activity for commercial boat launches.

In recent years, a month-long night ban began at 10 p.m. after the fishing opener. If a season-long night ban is imposed, it could begin at 8:30 p.m., Jones said.

Other possible options: Restrictions on the use of live bait, possibly during June and July, when hooking mortality is highest. Another option: requiring the use of circle hooks, and banning regular hooks or jigs, which could reduce mortality.

Members of the input group rejected those options.

Currently, four walleyes under 17 inches are allowed, with one fish over 28 inches.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Pittsburgh - LP: F. Liriano 0 FINAL
Cincinnati - WP: J. Cueto 4
Tampa Bay - LP: J. Odorizzi 0 FINAL
Baltimore - WP: M. Gonzalez 3
Chicago Cubs - LP: J. Hammel 0 FINAL
NY Yankees - WP: M. Tanaka 3
St. Louis - LP: J. Kelly 1 FINAL
Milwaukee - WP: W. Peralta 5
NY Mets - WP: D. Gee 5 FINAL
Arizona - LP: B. McCarthy 2
Atlanta - WP: J. Teheran 1 FINAL
Philadelphia - LP: C. Lee 0
Chicago Cubs - LP: T. Wood 0 FINAL
NY Yankees - WP: M. Pineda 2
Cleveland - WP: Z. McAllister 3 FINAL
Detroit - LP: A. Sanchez 2
Washington - WP: D. Storen 6 FINAL
Miami - LP: M. Dunn 3
Seattle - LP: F. Rodney 2 FINAL
Texas - WP: P. Figueroa 3
Boston - WP: C. Capuano 6 FINAL
Chicago WSox - LP: L. Garcia 4
Kansas City - WP: D. Duffy 6 FINAL
Houston - LP: J. Williams 4
Toronto 0 Postponed
Minnesota 0
Oakland - LP: D. Pomeranz 4 FINAL
LA Angels - WP: J. Smith 5
Colorado - LP: J. De La Rosa 2 FINAL
San Diego - WP: A. Cashner 4
Los Angeles - LP: J. Howell 1 FINAL
San Francisco - WP: J. Machi 2
Chicago 86 FINAL
Charlotte 91
Indiana 101 FINAL
Orlando 86
Atlanta 111 FINAL
Milwaukee 103
Dallas 105 FINAL
Memphis 106
Detroit 111 FINAL
Oklahoma City 112
Houston 100 FINAL
New Orleans 105
LA Lakers 113 FINAL
San Antonio 100
Brooklyn 85 FINAL
Cleveland 114
Philadelphia 100 FINAL
Miami 87
Utah 136 FINAL
Minnesota 130
Washington 118 FINAL
Boston 102
Toronto 92 FINAL
New York 95
Golden State 116 FINAL
Denver 112
LA Clippers 104 FINAL
Portland 110
Phoenix 104 FINAL
Sacramento 99
Montreal 5 FINAL(OT)
Tampa Bay 4
Columbus 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 4
Dallas 3 FINAL
Anaheim 4
Philadelphia 1 FINAL
Red Bull New York 2
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question