Anderson: Time was right for a wolf hunt

  • Article by: DENNIS ANDERSON , Star Tribune
  • Updated: December 1, 2012 - 7:24 PM

Disparate parties have a range of opinions on the necessity and propriety of the wolf hunt - but let's hope the debate sticks to the facts.

hide

Minnesota's wolf hunt started Nov. 3.

Photo: Macneill Lyons, Associated Press

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Though the Legislature doesn't convene until next month, maneuvering already has begun by those who intend to stop, or suspend, wolf hunting and trapping in Minnesota. Their primary argument is that the Legislature, the Department of Natural Resources or both irresponsibly jumped into the wolf-killing business absent due and careful consideration.

Those who buy into this fatuous fact dalliance will be gullible indeed. Regardless, expect plenty of loud talking, fist pounding and perhaps even a few tears to accompany the claim.

All of which should be considered for what it is: a marketing campaign to increase contributions to various groups, not least the Humane Society of the United States, which has threatened to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the delisting of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan gray wolves from the Endangered Species Act.

In point of fact, never has a Minnesota wildlife species received so much attention and so much scientific analysis as the gray wolf, while incurring the deliberation and costs of so many lawyers.

And all along, wolf hunting and trapping were part of the plan should the state's wolf population rebound from its low point in the 1960s.

"It is important to remember,'' the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said in its 1978 wolf recovery plan, "that the wolf is controversial, so there will be local opposition to any attempt to re-establish the animal or afford it any measure of protection. Similarly, there will be opposition from other quarters to any effort to control the animal, although control may be necessary for the good of the animal itself in certain areas. If re-establishment of the wolf is accomplished, regulated taking of the animal undoubtedly will be necessary in the restored range sooner or later.''

Officially, a "recovered'' state wolf population was expected to be 1,250 to 1,400 animals statewide, up from the 350 to 700 wolves that existed here before their protection was afforded in 1974 under the Endangered Species Act.

Everyone, or virtually everyone, agrees the listing was appropriate, because wolves here were so few, due in large part to bounties and unrestricted gunning and poisoning, both of which were highly effective.

Yet once these were disallowed, Minnesota wolves actually increased in number, even before Endangered Species Act listing.

Which is a point that suggests another, namely that Minnesota's wolf "problem'' in coming years in all likelihood will be that too few hunters and trappers -- among a fast-aging population of hunters and trappers -- will be willing to spend the time and money necessary to find and kill wolves, contributing, perhaps, to a further-burgeoning state wolf population that engenders more enemies than friends.

Speculation is involved here. But as Minnesota's inaugural managed wolf hunting and trapping seasons unfold, it's possible the 400-animal quota set by Minnesota's DNR won't be met -- this, even though hunters and trappers here are energized about the hunt, and even though initial wolf kills up north were recorded at what many believe was an unexpectedly fast clip.

Similarly, in Wisconsin, where the wolf season began in mid-October (as opposed to Nov. 3 in Minnesota), the harvest took off fairly quickly, particularly, it seemed, as trappers became more effective as the season progressed.

• • •

At least a couple of factors might have contributed to these early high kill rates, which in turn seem to suggest -- though perhaps falsely -- that hunting and trapping as presently construed can effectively help control wolves over the long term.

In Wisconsin, wolf hunting and trapping began when the ground was unfrozen and trappers were able to bury their traps, increasing their chances of fooling their prey.

In Minnesota, where trapping wasn't allowed until Nov. 24, that advantage generally has been unavailable -- contributing, perhaps, to the fairly slow rate of kill experienced in the state's second wolf season, which allows trapping.

Additionally, because Wisconsin hunters and trappers began their season in mid-October, they were more likely to encounter wolf pack "rendezvous sites,'' or areas where young wolves wait for their parents to return from hunting.

Rendezvous sites are the second step leading to broader pack dispersal. The first is the den where pups are born, and the area surrounding it, where the young wolves collect themselves even more tightly while waiting for their parents to return from killing a deer or other prey.

The older wolves subsequently regurgitate some of what they've eaten for the pups, who can aid the process by licking the older wolves' lips and faces.

Dens, in time, are abandoned for the rendezvous sites. In September and October, and sometimes as late as early November, the rendezvous sites also are abandoned, as packs five animals strong (on average) begin to roam territories that in Minnesota cover about 40 square miles.

Which more or less brings us to the present, with only some 45 animals killed so far in Minnesota's second wolf season. In Wisconsin's, the wolf harvest also has slowed.

Perhaps the pace will pick up. But perhaps not.

Perhaps, as indicated earlier, the 400-animal Minnesota quota won't be reached. Or even if it is, as years pass and ever-older Minnesota hunters and trappers tire of challenges associated with finding and killing wolves that likely will become only more elusive in response to harvest efforts, the problem in Minnesota will be as it has been worldwide for other recovered wolf populations.

How will the higher number of animals, over their expanded range, be controlled?

By allowing trapping earlier in Minnesota, when it might be more effective? Probably not, because of potential conflicts with hikers, grouse hunters and other recreationists. And because wolf pelts generally aren't gaining prime condition until December.

Minnesota researcher Dave Mech has been involved in wolf management and wolf reintroductions worldwide.

I asked him last week: "Have you ever known a recovered wolf population that didn't require control?''

"No.''

• • •

None of this will convince those opposed to wolf hunting and trapping of the propriety of -- never mind the necessity of -- these types of harvests.

Some people simply are not temperamentally suited to accept the willful killing of any animal, particularly one that isn't eaten.

These same people often refuse to acknowledge that most wildlife -- wolves in particular -- die a violent death. Far more so than that caused by a bullet.

And refuse to acknowledge as well that game and nongame wildlife are managed as populations, not as individuals. Thus a fundamental difference between these species and people.

Which is fine. We're all different, with different viewpoints.

But cooking up various "facts'' that are grounded more in fantasy than reality seems hardly the best way to gain ground among policymakers.

Yet this is the foolishness that seems to warrant more space in the ether now: that the Legislature and the DNR carelessly established a state wolf hunt, even though the record clearly shows that hunting and trapping were part not only of the federal wolf recovery plan dating to the 1970s, but part of the state's plan, circa 2001.

True, under the state plan -- the product in part of a deliberative roundtable of wolf observers and experts -- wolf hunting and trapping in Minnesota were to be stayed for five years after delisting.

But that was 11 years ago. By the time the state actually regained management of its wolves in January of this year, wolves here had "recovered'' still more, to a population of about 3,000.

Don't like wolf hunting and trapping?

That's OK. Everyone has his or her own personal list of likes and dislikes.

But when the subject is as important as, and iconic to the state as, wolves, appealing to the gullibility of others shouldn't replace reasoned judgment and careful overview.

With luck, it won't.

Dennis Anderson danderson@startribune. com

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toronto - LP: D. Hutchison 2 FINAL
NY Yankees - WP: M. Tanaka 5
Washington - WP: S. Strasburg 2 FINAL
Miami - LP: N. Eovaldi 1
NY Mets - WP: J. deGrom 10 FINAL
Atlanta - LP: E. Santana 2
Boston - WP: J. Kelly 3 FINAL
Baltimore - LP: M. Gonzalez 2
Milwaukee - LP: W. Peralta 0 FINAL
Pittsburgh - WP: V. Worley 1
Chicago WSox - WP: J. Danks 10 FINAL
Tampa Bay - LP: N. Karns 5
Cleveland - WP: C. Kluber 7 FINAL
Minnesota - LP: A. Swarzak 2
Detroit - LP: R. Porcello 2 FINAL
Kansas City - WP: J. Guthrie 5
Seattle - LP: H. Iwakuma 3 FINAL
Houston - WP: C. McHugh 8
Los Angeles - WP: C. Perez 8 FINAL
Chicago Cubs - LP: J. Turner 5
Texas - WP: S. Tolleson 2 FINAL
LA Angels - LP: H. Street 1
Philadelphia - LP: M. Gonzalez 6 FINAL
Oakland - WP: S. Doolittle 8
San Francisco - LP: R. Vogelsong 2 FINAL
San Diego - WP: I. Kennedy 8
Arizona - LP: W. Miley 3 FINAL
Colorado - WP: C. Bergman 8
Cincinnati - WP: A. Simon 7 FINAL
St. Louis - LP: L. Lynn 2
San Diego 22 FINAL
Buffalo 10
Dallas 34 FINAL
St. Louis 31
Washington 34 FINAL
Philadelphia 37
Houston 17 FINAL
NY Giants 30
Minnesota 9 FINAL
New Orleans 20
Tennessee 7 FINAL
Cincinnati 33
Baltimore 23 FINAL
Cleveland 21
Green Bay 7 FINAL
Detroit 19
Indianapolis 44 FINAL
Jacksonville 17
Oakland 9 FINAL
New England 16
San Francisco 14 FINAL
Arizona 23
Denver 20 FINAL
Seattle 26
Kansas City 34 FINAL
Miami 15
Pittsburgh 37 FINAL
Carolina 19
Chicago 9/22/14 7:30 PM
NY Jets
NY Giants 9/25/14 7:25 PM
Washington
Columbus 4 FINAL
Carolina 3
Buffalo 0 FINAL
Washington 1
St. Louis 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Calgary 1 FINAL
Edmonton 3
Edmonton 0 FINAL
Calgary 1
Old Dominion 45 FINAL
Rice 42
Troy 0 FINAL
(12) Georgia 66
Georgia Tech 27 FINAL
Virginia Tech 24
Eastern Mich 14 FINAL
(9) Michigan State 73
Iowa 24 FINAL
Pittsburgh 20
Bowling Green 17 FINAL
(19) Wisconsin 68
Maryland 34 FINAL
Syracuse 20
Tulane 13 FINAL
Duke 47
Hawaii 12 FINAL
Colorado 21
Marshall 48 FINAL
Akron 17
North Carolina 41 FINAL
(23) East Carolina 70
Army 21 FINAL
Wake Forest 24
Virginia 33 FINAL
(20) BYU 41
(6) Texas A&M 58 FINAL
SMU 6
Rutgers 31 FINAL
Navy 24
Central Mich 10 FINAL
Kansas 24
Utah 26 FINAL
Michigan 10
Florida 21 FINAL
(3) Alabama 42
Louisville 34 FINAL
FIU 3
Fla Atlantic 19 FINAL
Wyoming 20
Indiana 31 FINAL
Missouri 27
San Jose St 7 FINAL
Minnesota 24
Texas State 35 FINAL
Illinois 42
Massachusetts 7 FINAL
Penn State 48
Georgia State 14 FINAL
Washington 45
Appalachian St 20 FINAL
Southern Miss 21
(14) Miss State 34 FINAL
(17) LSU 29
Northern Ill 14 FINAL
Arkansas 52
Middle Tennessee 17 FINAL
Memphis 36
Utah State 14 FINAL
Arkansas State 21
Miami-Ohio 24 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Idaho 24 FINAL
Ohio U 36
Ball State 23 FINAL
Toledo 34
(13) So Carolina 48 FINAL
Vanderbilt 34
(4) Oklahoma 45 FINAL
West Virginia 33
Ga Southern 28 FINAL
South Alabama 6
UNLV 14 FINAL
Houston 47
Miami-Florida 31 FINAL
(21) Nebraska 41
New Mexico 38 FINAL
New Mexico St 35
Clemson 17 FINAL
(1) Florida State 23
California 45 FINAL
Arizona 49
San Diego St 7 FINAL
Oregon State 28
(2) Oregon 38 FINAL
Washington St 31
Louisiana 9 FINAL
Boise State 34
Texas Tech 9/25/14 6:30 PM
(24) Oklahoma State
Appalachian St 9/25/14 6:30 PM
Ga Southern
(11) UCLA 9/25/14 9:00 PM
(15) Arizona State
Middle Tennessee 9/26/14 7:00 PM
Old Dominion
Fresno State 9/26/14 7:00 PM
New Mexico
Texas-El Paso 9/27/14 11:00 AM
(25) Kansas State
Tennessee 9/27/14 11:00 AM
(12) Georgia
Vanderbilt 9/27/14 11:00 AM
Kentucky
Wyoming 9/27/14 11:00 AM
(9) Michigan State
Northwestern 9/27/14 11:00 AM
Penn State
TCU 9/27/14 11:00 AM
SMU
Iowa 9/27/14 11:00 AM
Purdue
Tulane 9/27/14 11:00 AM
Rutgers
So Florida 9/27/14 11:00 AM
(19) Wisconsin
Colorado State 9/27/14 11:30 AM
Boston College
Western Mich 9/27/14 11:30 AM
Virginia Tech
Maryland 9/27/14 12:30 PM
Indiana
Akron 9/27/14 12:30 PM
Pittsburgh
Bowling Green 9/27/14 2:00 PM
Massachusetts
Arkansas 9/27/14 2:30 PM
(6) Texas A&M
Kent State 9/27/14 2:30 PM
Virginia
Western Ky 9/27/14 2:30 PM
Navy
Minnesota 9/27/14 2:30 PM
Michigan
Wake Forest 9/27/14 2:30 PM
Louisville
FIU 9/27/14 2:30 PM
UAB
(1) Florida State 9/27/14 2:30 PM
NC State
Miami-Ohio 9/27/14 2:30 PM
Buffalo
Colorado 9/27/14 3:00 PM
California
Louisiana Tech 9/27/14 3:00 PM
(5) Auburn
Texas 9/27/14 3:00 PM
Kansas
Temple 9/27/14 3:00 PM
Connecticut
(16) Stanford 9/27/14 3:15 PM
Washington
TX-San Antonio 9/27/14 4:00 PM
Fla Atlantic
South Alabama 9/27/14 4:00 PM
Idaho
Cincinnati 9/27/14 5:00 PM
(22) Ohio State
Rice 9/27/14 6:00 PM
Southern Miss
Missouri 9/27/14 6:00 PM
(13) So Carolina
Boise State 9/27/14 6:00 PM
Air Force
North Carolina 9/27/14 6:00 PM
Clemson
Central Mich 9/27/14 6:00 PM
Toledo
Troy 9/27/14 6:00 PM
ULM
New Mexico St 9/27/14 6:30 PM
(17) LSU
Memphis 9/27/14 6:30 PM
(10) Ole Miss
Duke 9/27/14 6:30 PM
Miami-Florida
Texas State 9/27/14 7:00 PM
Tulsa
Washington St 9/27/14 7:00 PM
Utah
(8) Notre Dame 9/27/14 7:00 PM
Syracuse
(7) Baylor 9/27/14 7:00 PM
Iowa State
UNLV 9/27/14 7:00 PM
San Diego St
Illinois 9/27/14 8:00 PM
(21) Nebraska
Oregon State 9/27/14 9:30 PM
(18) USC
Nevada 9/27/14 9:30 PM
San Jose St
Chivas USA 0 FINAL
Toronto FC 3
Toronto 40 FINAL
Brt Columbia 23
Edmonton 23 FINAL
Hamilton 25
Calgary 15 FINAL
Montreal 31
Ottawa 32 FINAL
Saskatchewan 35
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close