Anderson: Time was right for a wolf hunt

  • Article by: DENNIS ANDERSON , Star Tribune
  • Updated: December 1, 2012 - 7:24 PM

Disparate parties have a range of opinions on the necessity and propriety of the wolf hunt - but let's hope the debate sticks to the facts.

hide

Minnesota's wolf hunt started Nov. 3.

Photo: Macneill Lyons, Associated Press

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Though the Legislature doesn't convene until next month, maneuvering already has begun by those who intend to stop, or suspend, wolf hunting and trapping in Minnesota. Their primary argument is that the Legislature, the Department of Natural Resources or both irresponsibly jumped into the wolf-killing business absent due and careful consideration.

Those who buy into this fatuous fact dalliance will be gullible indeed. Regardless, expect plenty of loud talking, fist pounding and perhaps even a few tears to accompany the claim.

All of which should be considered for what it is: a marketing campaign to increase contributions to various groups, not least the Humane Society of the United States, which has threatened to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the delisting of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan gray wolves from the Endangered Species Act.

In point of fact, never has a Minnesota wildlife species received so much attention and so much scientific analysis as the gray wolf, while incurring the deliberation and costs of so many lawyers.

And all along, wolf hunting and trapping were part of the plan should the state's wolf population rebound from its low point in the 1960s.

"It is important to remember,'' the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said in its 1978 wolf recovery plan, "that the wolf is controversial, so there will be local opposition to any attempt to re-establish the animal or afford it any measure of protection. Similarly, there will be opposition from other quarters to any effort to control the animal, although control may be necessary for the good of the animal itself in certain areas. If re-establishment of the wolf is accomplished, regulated taking of the animal undoubtedly will be necessary in the restored range sooner or later.''

Officially, a "recovered'' state wolf population was expected to be 1,250 to 1,400 animals statewide, up from the 350 to 700 wolves that existed here before their protection was afforded in 1974 under the Endangered Species Act.

Everyone, or virtually everyone, agrees the listing was appropriate, because wolves here were so few, due in large part to bounties and unrestricted gunning and poisoning, both of which were highly effective.

Yet once these were disallowed, Minnesota wolves actually increased in number, even before Endangered Species Act listing.

Which is a point that suggests another, namely that Minnesota's wolf "problem'' in coming years in all likelihood will be that too few hunters and trappers -- among a fast-aging population of hunters and trappers -- will be willing to spend the time and money necessary to find and kill wolves, contributing, perhaps, to a further-burgeoning state wolf population that engenders more enemies than friends.

Speculation is involved here. But as Minnesota's inaugural managed wolf hunting and trapping seasons unfold, it's possible the 400-animal quota set by Minnesota's DNR won't be met -- this, even though hunters and trappers here are energized about the hunt, and even though initial wolf kills up north were recorded at what many believe was an unexpectedly fast clip.

Similarly, in Wisconsin, where the wolf season began in mid-October (as opposed to Nov. 3 in Minnesota), the harvest took off fairly quickly, particularly, it seemed, as trappers became more effective as the season progressed.

• • •

At least a couple of factors might have contributed to these early high kill rates, which in turn seem to suggest -- though perhaps falsely -- that hunting and trapping as presently construed can effectively help control wolves over the long term.

In Wisconsin, wolf hunting and trapping began when the ground was unfrozen and trappers were able to bury their traps, increasing their chances of fooling their prey.

In Minnesota, where trapping wasn't allowed until Nov. 24, that advantage generally has been unavailable -- contributing, perhaps, to the fairly slow rate of kill experienced in the state's second wolf season, which allows trapping.

Additionally, because Wisconsin hunters and trappers began their season in mid-October, they were more likely to encounter wolf pack "rendezvous sites,'' or areas where young wolves wait for their parents to return from hunting.

Rendezvous sites are the second step leading to broader pack dispersal. The first is the den where pups are born, and the area surrounding it, where the young wolves collect themselves even more tightly while waiting for their parents to return from killing a deer or other prey.

The older wolves subsequently regurgitate some of what they've eaten for the pups, who can aid the process by licking the older wolves' lips and faces.

Dens, in time, are abandoned for the rendezvous sites. In September and October, and sometimes as late as early November, the rendezvous sites also are abandoned, as packs five animals strong (on average) begin to roam territories that in Minnesota cover about 40 square miles.

Which more or less brings us to the present, with only some 45 animals killed so far in Minnesota's second wolf season. In Wisconsin's, the wolf harvest also has slowed.

Perhaps the pace will pick up. But perhaps not.

Perhaps, as indicated earlier, the 400-animal Minnesota quota won't be reached. Or even if it is, as years pass and ever-older Minnesota hunters and trappers tire of challenges associated with finding and killing wolves that likely will become only more elusive in response to harvest efforts, the problem in Minnesota will be as it has been worldwide for other recovered wolf populations.

How will the higher number of animals, over their expanded range, be controlled?

By allowing trapping earlier in Minnesota, when it might be more effective? Probably not, because of potential conflicts with hikers, grouse hunters and other recreationists. And because wolf pelts generally aren't gaining prime condition until December.

Minnesota researcher Dave Mech has been involved in wolf management and wolf reintroductions worldwide.

I asked him last week: "Have you ever known a recovered wolf population that didn't require control?''

"No.''

• • •

None of this will convince those opposed to wolf hunting and trapping of the propriety of -- never mind the necessity of -- these types of harvests.

Some people simply are not temperamentally suited to accept the willful killing of any animal, particularly one that isn't eaten.

These same people often refuse to acknowledge that most wildlife -- wolves in particular -- die a violent death. Far more so than that caused by a bullet.

And refuse to acknowledge as well that game and nongame wildlife are managed as populations, not as individuals. Thus a fundamental difference between these species and people.

Which is fine. We're all different, with different viewpoints.

But cooking up various "facts'' that are grounded more in fantasy than reality seems hardly the best way to gain ground among policymakers.

Yet this is the foolishness that seems to warrant more space in the ether now: that the Legislature and the DNR carelessly established a state wolf hunt, even though the record clearly shows that hunting and trapping were part not only of the federal wolf recovery plan dating to the 1970s, but part of the state's plan, circa 2001.

True, under the state plan -- the product in part of a deliberative roundtable of wolf observers and experts -- wolf hunting and trapping in Minnesota were to be stayed for five years after delisting.

But that was 11 years ago. By the time the state actually regained management of its wolves in January of this year, wolves here had "recovered'' still more, to a population of about 3,000.

Don't like wolf hunting and trapping?

That's OK. Everyone has his or her own personal list of likes and dislikes.

But when the subject is as important as, and iconic to the state as, wolves, appealing to the gullibility of others shouldn't replace reasoned judgment and careful overview.

With luck, it won't.

Dennis Anderson danderson@startribune. com

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tennessee 7:25 PM
Jacksonville
Philadelphia 12/20/14 3:30 PM
Washington
San Diego 12/20/14 7:25 PM
San Francisco
Minnesota 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Miami
Baltimore 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Houston
Detroit 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Chicago
Cleveland 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Carolina
Atlanta 12/21/14 12:00 PM
New Orleans
Green Bay 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Tampa Bay
Kansas City 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Pittsburgh
New England 12/21/14 12:00 PM
NY Jets
NY Giants 12/21/14 3:05 PM
St. Louis
Buffalo 12/21/14 3:25 PM
Oakland
Indianapolis 12/21/14 3:25 PM
Dallas
Seattle 12/21/14 7:30 PM
Arizona
Denver 12/22/14 7:30 PM
Cincinnati
Atlanta 127 FINAL
Cleveland 98
Phoenix 111 FINAL
Charlotte 106
Dallas 117 FINAL
Detroit 106
Utah 105 FINAL
Miami 87
Orlando 92 FINAL
Boston 109
Brooklyn 89 FINAL
Toronto 105
Memphis 117 FINAL
San Antonio 116
Milwaukee 97 FINAL
Portland 104
Houston 115 FINAL
Denver 111
Indiana 100 FINAL
LA Clippers 102
Ottawa 2 FINAL
New Jersey 0
Boston 3 FINAL(OT)
Minnesota 2
Dallas 2 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Langston 65 FINAL
North Texas 78
Delaware State 72 FINAL
St Francis-NY 64
James Madison 72 FINAL
Ball State 52
SIU Edwardsville 65 FINAL
Campbell 70
St Francis-PA 67 FINAL
Duquesne 52
North Florida 77 FINAL
Florida State 93
Catawba 69 FINAL
George Mason 99
Ferrum 48 FINAL
High Point 106
Hampton 55 FINAL
Illinois 73
Gardner-Webb 65 FINAL
Jacksonville 68
Longwood 60 FINAL
Miami-Ohio 71
Arkansas State 69 FINAL
Miss State 55
Tennessee 72 FINAL
NC State 83
NC A&T 55 FINAL
Ohio State 97
Manhattan 56 FINAL
Pittsburgh 65
Robert Morris 57 FINAL
Toledo 83
Char Southern 58 FINAL
Wofford 64
Kennesaw St 90 FINAL
Youngstown St 84
Barber-Scotia 52 FINAL
NC Central 108
Detroit 70 FINAL
UCF 75
Liberty 70 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 73
TX A&M-CC 73 FINAL
Denver 83
Ark-Pine Bluff 61 FINAL
Houston 56
UT Martin 54 FINAL
Illinois State 64
Milligan 76 FINAL
Louisiana 115
Abilene Christian 44 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 83
USC Upstate 73 FINAL
Memphis 83
Alcorn State 56 FINAL
Murray State 94
Central Mich 80 FINAL
Northwestern 67
Georgia State 54 FINAL
Old Dominion 58
TX-Pan American 69 FINAL
Saint Louis 75
Ill-Chicago 46 FINAL
SMU 67
Texas State 60 FINAL
Stephen F Austin 66
SC State 39 FINAL
Texas Tech 101
Missouri State 70 FINAL
Tulsa 74
Chicago State 60 FINAL
Western Ky 75
Morehead State 50 FINAL
Green Bay 66
Northern Colorado 82 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 92
Winthrop 62 FINAL
Auburn 80
New Mexico St 55 FINAL
Baylor 66
San Diego St 62 FINAL
Cincinnati 71
Eastern Mich 46 FINAL
Michigan State 66
Loyola Marymount 58 FINAL
Stanford 67
Incarnate Word 82 FINAL
Grand Canyon 80
Northeastern 58 FINAL
Cal Poly 60
Central Arkansas 55 FINAL
New Mexico 76
Howard 45 FINAL
Pepperdine 53
Portland 73 FINAL
UNLV 75
CS-Northridge 56 FINAL
Oregon 79
Grambling St 38 FINAL
Washington 86
Nevada 12/20/14 10:00 AM
Louisiana
Utah State 12/20/14 1:20 PM
Texas-El Paso
(23) Utah 12/20/14 2:30 PM
Colorado State
Western Mich 12/20/14 4:45 PM
Air Force
South Alabama 12/20/14 8:15 PM
Bowling Green
BYU 12/22/14 1:00 PM
Memphis
Marshall 12/23/14 5:00 PM
Northern Ill
Navy 12/23/14 8:30 PM
San Diego St
Central Mich 12/24/14 11:00 AM
Western Ky
Fresno State 12/24/14 7:00 PM
Rice
Western Carolina 79 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 66
(21) Miss State 66 FINAL
Louisiana 51
(25) DePaul 109 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 84
Liberty 64 FINAL
NC State 67
Elon 77 FINAL
Campbell 51
Akron 73 FINAL
UCF 64
Richmond 77 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 67
Montana 70 FINAL
Seattle 64
(7) Stanford 46 FINAL
Chattanooga 54
Florida A&M 69 FINAL
Southern U 80
Oklahoma 72 FINAL
(13) Duke 92
Savannah State 56 FINAL
Auburn 62
Northern Colorado 43 FINAL
South Florida 84
Youngstown St 73 FINAL
Robert Morris 65
Siena 75 FINAL
Sacred Heart 65
Vermont 63 FINAL
St Francis-NY 61
(1) South Carolina 69 FINAL
Hampton 49
Fla Gulf Coast 91 FINAL
Bethune-Cookman 46
Texas Southern 92 FINAL
Houston Baptist 80
Northwestern 88 FINAL
UNLV 84
NC A&T 70 FINAL
Appalachian St 72
NC Central 52 FINAL
Coastal Carolina 67
Drexel 50 FINAL
Quinnipiac 74
Cincinnati 52 FINAL
Northern Ky 66
Alabama State 53 FINAL
Georgia Tech 77
Morehead St 69 FINAL
USC Upstate 75
Arkansas State 59 FINAL
Kent State 44
American Univ 60 FINAL
Manhattan 52
UNC Greensboro 60 FINAL
St Bonaventure 78
Arkansas-Monticello 56 FINAL
Northwestern St 61
Prairie View 70 FINAL
Sam Houston St 51
McNeese State 59 FINAL
(3) Texas 76
Yale 90 FINAL
Wagner 65
Oakland 61 FINAL
TX A&M-CC 54
Eastern Kentucky 62 FINAL
Alabama A&M 56
SIU-Edwardsville 47 FINAL
Northern Ill 69
McMurry 25 FINAL
TX-Arlington 82
Portland 65 FINAL
Eastern Washington 72
North Texas 42 FINAL
San Francisco 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close