Editorial: Scrutiny needed on BWCA swap

  • Updated: July 16, 2012 - 12:03 AM

Boundary Waters land deal would mostly benefit industry.



Photo: Brian Peterson, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

For all the big talk in northern Minnesota these days, you'd think a pot of gold had been discovered deep in the Boundary Waters -- enough to rescue the state's public schools from penury if only tree-huggers would get out of the way. Too bad it's largely a fairy tale.

The issue is the proposed Boundary Waters land swap now before Congress. It's the latest act in the long-running morality play that dominates politics in the north woods -- although this time "our schoolchildren" have been added to the familiar cast of hot-button characters -- pitting timber and mining interests on one side and federal bureaucrats and nature preservationists on the other.

The tale deserves a more complete telling and a more sober decision than lawmakers have so far delivered.

Let's start at the beginning. In 1849, Congress established Minnesota's territorial government and launched a process that held in trust two square miles in every township to benefit public schools. Over the years, most of the original 8.3 million acres of these "school trust lands" were sold or leased for private development. Proceeds were pooled and invested, with earnings applied to school budgets.

By the middle of the 20th century, only a small portion of the trust lands remained, mostly in northern Minnesota.

When, in 1978, Congress established the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, 93,000 acres of school trust lands were trapped within the park and rendered unusable for development because of the BWCA's prohibitions against mining and timber cutting. Numerous attempts at a federal buyout or a swap of these lands have failed over the years because of bitter feuding between development and environmental interests.

Earlier this year, in a rare bipartisan maneuver, the Republican-controlled Legislature and DFL Gov. Mark Dayton stepped in to pass an expedited land swap, opening the way for approval by Congress.

U.S. Rep. Chip Cravaack's bill (HR5544) would execute the swap, trading a patchwork of school trust land within the BWCA (86,000 acres) for an unspecified amount of less-regulated federal land within the adjacent Superior National Forest. This land would presumably be converted to mining or logging, with proceeds benefiting the schools. Usual environmental review procedures would be bypassed.

Cravaack, a freshman Republican, sees his bill as a win for all sides, but that's not quite correct. Benefits for the BWCA would be negligible. The Superior National Forest would suffer additional intrusive mining of an uncertain scale at unspecified locations, with key decisions made largely in the shadows. The local economy would surely benefit as a result, but nobody knows by how much.

As for the state's schoolchildren, their benefit would be paltry despite all the high-toned rhetoric. Of the $9,000 or so per year that governments spend on an average Minnesota pupil, about $26 (less than 1 percent) comes from school trust lands, according to congressional testimony. Even if this particular land swap doubled the trust fund's contribution, the impact on kids would be microscopic.

The greatest potential benefit would flow to the large international mining companies that dominate lease activities in the region and, of course, to the politicians whose campaign coffers might expand, thanks to the generosity of those same companies.

There's no doubt that the nation, stuck in a sour economy, is in the mood for extraction. The hunger to drill, dig and frac is plain to see, from the Gulf of Mexico to the Bakken oil fields -- and now to the Superior National Forest, where the open-pit mining of sulfides is contemplated.

Eagerness to circumvent environmental laws and procedures is part of the pattern. As one legislator (Rep. David Dill, DFL-Crane Lake) said of the proposed land swap: "We should mine, log and lease the hell out of that land that we get in the change."

Assuming that Cravaack's bill passes the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate -- namely Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, both Democrats -- should summon the courage to ask harder questions: Why should this land swap escape environmental review? What will be the size and location of the traded land? What are the economic and environmental tradeoffs? How can the public trust those making surveys and selections to rely on sound cost-benefit analysis rather than on political pressure? Could their decisions affect the 100,000 acres of state-held mineral rights that still exist within the BWCA? Shouldn't the process be more transparent?

Cravaack's bill, in present form, fails to include those assurances and fails the credibility test as well. This land swap isn't about Minnesota's hard-pressed schoolchildren. It's about converting forest land to mining.


Readers, what do you think? To offer an opinion considered for publication as a letter to the editor, please fill out this form. Follow us on Twitter @StribOpinion and Facebook at facebook.com/StribOpinion.


    "HR5544 would allow these lands to generate revenue for Minnesota schools, which they desperately need."

    -NANCY MCREADY, president, Conservationists with Common Sense

    • • •

    "A direct sale of state lands within the BWCAW to the federal government would generate money for [schools] without harming the environment for future generations of children."

    -ELANNE PALCICH, spokeswoman, Save Our Sky Blue Waters

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Atlanta 2
Philadelphia 3 FINAL
NY Yankees 1
Detroit 5 FINAL
Baltimore 4
Toronto 4 FINAL
Pittsburgh 1
Cincinnati 2 FINAL
Cleveland 4
San Diego 3 FINAL
Seattle 4
Chicago WSox 6 FINAL
Los Angeles 4
Kansas City 13 FINAL
Texas 2
Oakland 9 FINAL
San Francisco 2
Wisc-Milwaukee 0 FINAL
Milwaukee 8
Arizona 6 FINAL
Colorado 3
Univ of Minnesota 1 FINAL
Minnesota 3
New York 82 FINAL
Indiana 105
Phoenix 105 FINAL
Orlando 100
Cleveland 120 FINAL
Toronto 112
Utah 84 FINAL
Boston 85
Charlotte 115 FINAL
Brooklyn 91
Denver 100 FINAL
Minnesota 85
Detroit 85 FINAL
New Orleans 88
LA Lakers 94 FINAL
Miami 100
Philadelphia 118 FINAL
Oklahoma City 123
Memphis 102 FINAL
Houston 100
Sacramento 85 FINAL
San Antonio 112
Milwaukee 53 3rd Qtr
Golden State 53
Portland 46 3rd Qtr
LA Clippers 48
Ottawa 3 FINAL
Winnipeg 1
NY Rangers 1 FINAL(OT)
Detroit 2
Pittsburgh 0 3rd Prd
Colorado 2
Montreal 0 2nd Prd 3:15
Anaheim 2
Longwood 65 FINAL
Presbyterian 61
Campbell 64 FINAL
Gardner-Webb 72
Liberty 70 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 80
Ohio State 77 FINAL
Penn State 67
Maine 66 FINAL
Albany 83
Duquesne 81 FINAL
Fordham 66
George Washington 67 FINAL
George Mason 51
Tennessee 78 FINAL
LSU 63
Notre Dame 71 FINAL
Louisville 59
SE Missouri St 74 FINAL
Morehead State 79
St Francis-PA 73 FINAL
Mount St Marys 58
Hartford 63 FINAL
New Hampshire 67
Wagner 68 FINAL
Robert Morris 91
Long Island 70 FINAL
St Francis-NY 79
La Salle 50 FINAL
Saint Josephs 55
Providence 79 FINAL
Seton Hall 66
South Florida 74
Binghamton 57 FINAL
Stony Brook 62
Vermont 66
Sacred Heart 85 FINAL
Bryant 91
Richmond 56 FINAL
Massachusetts 53
Wake Forest 51 FINAL
Duke 94
Purdue 66 FINAL
Michigan State 72
Miami-Florida 67 FINAL
Pittsburgh 63
St Bonaventure 64 FINAL
Saint Louis 48
New Mexico St 69 FINAL
TX-Pan American 48
Houston 68 FINAL
Tulane 63
Howard 62 FINAL
Oklahoma State 82
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
Tulsa 47
Miss State 56 FINAL
Vanderbilt 66
Utah State 53 FINAL
Wyoming 76
St Johns 67 FINAL
Marquette 51
SIU Edwardsville 66 FINAL
Eastern Ill 78
Air Force 62 2nd Half 2:10
Fresno State 65
Nebraska 44 2nd Half 7:22
Illinois 51
Colorado State 72 2nd Half 5:44
Nevada 51
Boise State 58 2nd Half 10:57
San Jose St 36
San Diego St 24 1st Half 3:55
Oregon 21 1st Half 2:54
Oregon State 28
UC Santa Barbara 10:59 PM
Toledo 64 FINAL
Northern Ill 68
Wake Forest 69 FINAL
Boston College 53
Eastern Illinois 35 FINAL
UT Martin 68
Austin Peay 69 FINAL
SIU-Edwardsville 72
Virginia Tech 57 FINAL
NC State 56
Massachusetts 55 FINAL
St Bonaventure 49
Auburn 71 FINAL
Florida 49
Penn State 63 FINAL
Indiana 68
Clemson 53 FINAL
Georgia Tech 80
Davidson 63 FINAL
La Salle 74
Loyola-Maryland 46 FINAL
Lafayette 58
Boston U 48 FINAL
Colgate 58
Coll of Charleston 58 FINAL
James Madison 107
Delaware 76 FINAL
Elon 77
Drexel 58 FINAL
Northeastern 42
Hofstra 75 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 76
Towson 56 FINAL
William & Mary 68
Miami-Ohio 55 FINAL
Akron 67
Ball State 85 FINAL
Central Michigan 69
Buffalo 55 FINAL
Bowling Green 47
Western Mich 65 FINAL
Eastern Michigan 74
Ohio U 69 FINAL
Kent State 56
Youngstown St 62 FINAL
Cleveland State 73
Illinois-Chicago 54 FINAL
Wright State 74
Alabama 56 FINAL
Vanderbilt 66
Detroit 60 FINAL
Milwaukee 56
Purdue 58 FINAL
Wisconsin 56
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question