Anderson: State should care more about its own ducks

  • Article by: DENNIS ANDERSON , Star Tribune
  • Updated: July 12, 2012 - 10:24 PM

Minnesotans have been duped by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's "liberal" management scheme.

Whether waterfowl manager is a scientific occupation or one devoted instead largely to cheerleading is a fair question now that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has reported "record" numbers of ducks on the continent.

Perhaps the service's estimated increase to 48.6 million ducks from last year's 45.6 million is accurate, perhaps not. Either way, it shouldn't affect duck-starved Minnesota, where wildlife managers in recent years have been busy trying to help hunters shoot their way back to waterfowling prosperity.

Not enough ducks in the bag on the season's first day because the state has relatively fewer ducks to offer its definitely fewer hunters now than in the past?

Let's change shooting time on the opener from noon to 9 a.m., en route finally to -- as last year -- starting shooting one-half hour before sunrise, thereby increasing hunter harvest.

That'll help ducks recover.

Ditto the 4 p.m. closing during the season's first weeks, which, like the noon opener, was intended to provide a respite for ducks, particularly for those reared here, encouraging them to stay in the state longer, while also more widely distributing the early season harvest.

Let's send that idea packing too.

In fairness, Minnesota waterfowl managers hoop and holler like grade-schoolers compared to the Dallas Cowboys cheerleader-like antics of their colleagues in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

It's the service's Adaptive Harvest Management (AHM) scheme that has duped Minnesota hunters since its beginning in 1995, suggesting each year that we've had enough ducks here to support a "liberal" six-duck limit and a 60-day season.

Which doubtless the state will have again this year -- six ducks daily and 60 days -- now that the media have done their part and trumpeted this "record number of ducks" hooey.

Helpful here might be reference to a recently completed study by Todd Arnold and Cristina de Sobrino of the department of fisheries, wildlife and conservation biology at the U.

Arnold and De Sobrino wanted to know in which state or province mallards originate, relative to the states in which they are harvested.

Put another way, specific to Minnesota, is the old saw that "three-quarters of the ducks we shoot come from Canada" still true, as it was believed to be years ago?

The answer is important for many reasons, among them as a determinant in developing regulations concerning shooting times, bag limits, season lengths, habitat conservation, etc. Obviously, a state (think Iowa) that is entirely, or nearly entirely, dependent on another state or province for its ducks will regulate its season and allocate its habitat resources (if any) in ways different than, say, Minnesota, North Dakota or South Dakota, each of which is a duck-producer.

"It is true that in the 1960s and 1970s, as much as 75 percent of the mallards that were killed in Minnesota came from other states and provinces," Arnold said. "But that's no longer the case. Today, 50 percent of mallards that are harvested in the state were raised here."

Meaning that what Minnesota (and even more so Wisconsin, where 73 percent of harvested mallards were home-reared, and Michigan -- 68 percent) does today in terms of habitat preservation and enhancement, and hunting regulations, is more important than ever.

(Caveat: Arnold and De Sobrino studied only mallards, because only they are banded in sufficient numbers to do these kinds of analyses. Not unreasonably, given the overall lack of ducks in Minnesota, similar inferences could be drawn for at least some other species.)

Said Arnold: "Here in Minnesota, we should care about our own ducks and our own local habitat and not depend on the great northern duck factory to bail us out, because it won't. In Minnesota, we'll eat what we produce."

Whether AHM is merely a complicating factor in this relatively recent phenomenon, or a contributor, is unknown. What is known is that the six-and-60 liberal seasons in place since the strategy's beginning have been based on what's described as the Midcontinent mallard breeding population, which includes the Dakotas and prairie Canada, as well as Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.

"But mallards in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan are a drop in the bucket compared to these other areas," Arnold said, adding:

"Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan really should be aware of the potential of their local birds to be overharvested during years of liberal seasons. Maybe it shouldn't be like managing resident species such as pheasants or grouse. But something like that."

Dennis Anderson • danderson@startribune.com

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tampa 6 FINAL
Philadelphia 2
LA Clippers 96 FINAL
Chicago 86
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Houston 105
Golden State 106 FINAL
Boston 101
Philadelphia 74 FINAL
Indiana 94
Portland 110 FINAL
Sacramento 99
Charlotte 98 FINAL
Orlando 83
Oklahoma City 108 FINAL
LA Lakers 101
New Orleans 99 FINAL
Denver 92
Los Angeles 2 FINAL
Winnipeg 5
Tampa Bay 3 FINAL
Florida 4
Columbus 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Toronto 0 FINAL
Washington 4
Anaheim 3 FINAL
Dallas 1
St. Louis 5 1st OT 1:38
Vancouver 5
SMU 73 FINAL
Connecticut 81
Quinnipiac 65 FINAL
Manhattan 69
Fairfield 56 FINAL
Niagara 57
Marist 49 FINAL
Rider 59
Iona 60 FINAL
Saint Peters 68
Oregon State 56 FINAL
California 73
South Florida 55 FINAL
Houston 72
Marquette 66 FINAL
Providence 77
Michigan State 61 FINAL
Wisconsin 68
Siena 57 FINAL
Monmouth 63
Pittsburgh 66 FINAL
Wake Forest 69
Oregon 73 FINAL
Stanford 70
Purdue 61 FINAL
Ohio State 65
Arizona State 81 FINAL
Colorado 87
Washington St 67 FINAL
UCLA 72
Georgetown 66 FINAL
Providence 81
Binghamton 50 FINAL
UMBC 73
Elon 65 FINAL
Hofstra 58
Virginia Tech 47 FINAL
Boston College 49
(8) Louisville 59 FINAL
Virginia 75
Texas 69 FINAL
West Virginia 76
Creighton 53 FINAL
Villanova 61
Seton Hall 85 FINAL
Butler 76
UNC-Wilmington 76 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 65
(5) Maryland 69 FINAL
(25) Northwestern 48
Saint Josephs 67 FINAL
La Salle 55
Louisiana Tech 53 FINAL
TX-San Antonio 60
Rhode Island 70 FINAL
Massachusetts 78
Richmond 55 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 49
Davidson 46 FINAL
Fordham 54
St Bonaventure 43 FINAL
Duquesne 51
George Mason 45 FINAL
(22) George Washington 80
Indiana 60 FINAL
(20) Rutgers 71
(12) Texas A&M 63 FINAL
LSU 80
Ole Miss 47 FINAL
(11) Miss State 55
Clemson 56 FINAL
Pittsburgh 61
Maine 47 FINAL
New Hampshire 61
Vermont 48 FINAL
Albany 76
Quinnipiac 87 FINAL
Monmouth 48
Saint Peters 47 FINAL
Siena 64
(4) Notre Dame 67 FINAL
NC State 60
Wisconsin 62 FINAL
Penn State 56
Stony Brook 49 FINAL
Hartford 56
Northeastern 47 FINAL
William & Mary 62
St Johns 61 FINAL
Xavier 74
James Madison 74 FINAL
Delaware 71
Towson 45 FINAL
Drexel 50
Illinois State 50 FINAL
Bradley 60
Southern Ill 74 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 70
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Wichita State 66
Minnesota 76 FINAL
(17) Iowa 92
(15) North Carolina 80 FINAL
(16) Duke 81
Alabama 73 FINAL
Auburn 80
(9) Florida State 69 FINAL
Miami-Florida 55
Arkansas 41 FINAL
Missouri 57
Georgia 52 FINAL
Florida 45
Dayton 95 FINAL
Saint Louis 68
Drake 57 FINAL
Missouri State 86
Colorado 46 FINAL
(10) Arizona State 59
(19) Stanford 55 FINAL
Oregon 62
Marquette 82 FINAL
DePaul 99
Southern Miss 66 FINAL
Texas-El Paso 60
Vanderbilt 49 FINAL
(6) Tennessee 79
(2) South Carolina 56 FINAL
(13) Kentucky 67
Utah 41 FINAL
Arizona 64
Ohio State 78 FINAL
Nebraska 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close