Legislators are expected to pass a dedicated conservation funding bill this session, perhaps as soon as Thursday.
But after 10 years of consideration of the measure at the Capitol, with the bill almost passing, nearly passing and just about passing a handful of times, no one is saying with certainty when passage might occur during the legislative session that begins Tuesday.
The bill would place on the November ballot a constitutional amendment proposal that would raise the state sales tax three-eighths of 1 percent. The money -- about $300 million per year -- would be earmarked for fish and wildlife habitat, cleaning up the state's rivers and lakes, parks and the arts.
A conference committee last session approved a compromise between two bills passed by the House and Senate. But the session ended before the House -- which must act first -- could vote on the committee report.
House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher and Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller have promised to bring the dedicated funding bill to votes in their respective chambers early in the session.
Supporters say timely passage is important so they can mount an effective public relations campaign before the November election. A majority of people who cast votes must approve the constitutional amendment plan for it to pass.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty has said he supports dedicated funding for the outdoors. But in Minnesota, a governor's signature is not required on bills that place constitutional amendments on the ballot. Indeed, Minnesota governors have no authority over such proposals.
Sufficient votes exist in the House and Senate to pass the conference committee report. But insiders are concerned House Republicans will filibuster to delay a vote.
SportsmenForChange.org Executive Director Garry Leaf said his group and others in the broad coalition that support the amendment will monitor the House and Senate votes closely.
"The state is at extreme risk of losing its natural heritage, its clean water and its remaining resources,'' he said. "Dedicated funding is the future of hunting and angling in Minnesota. It's our last best hope.''
Supporters have said $5 million will be needed to pay for a public relations and advertising campaign to help pass the measure.
outdoors
resize text 
Newspaper Subscriptions
eEdition
RSS
Newsletters
