Hunting on private land: Walking away from walk-ins

  • Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 29, 2012 - 7:44 AM

A new program that has opened thousands of hunting acres might fizzle for lack of funding.


Minnesota’s new walk-in hunting access program was a hit last fall. Here, Tim McMullen of Delano hunted pheasants last December in Lac qui Parle County.

Photo: Doug Smith, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Build it and they will come. But will they pay for it?

After 20 years of debate, a walk-in hunter access program became a reality last fall in Minnesota -- and was enthusiastically embraced by hunters.

But the fledgling program, which opened 9,000 private acres to public hunting, already is at a crossroads, and some fear it could die for lack of money before it gets off the ground.

"That would be a lost opportunity," said Marybeth Block, the program's coordinator with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Kevin Auslund of Eden Prairie, an avid pheasant hunter and program advocate, agrees.

"Do we hunters let this opportunity slip through our fingers?" he asked.

We'll likely find out this year. The DNR is proposing a $15 fee.

Auslund fears that's too much and could kill the program.

"I'll probably pay it because I'm an avid pheasant hunter, but I think it's going to be a tough sell,'' he said.

The problem: The DNR would need to sell 33,000 of the $15 license validations to generate $500,000 -- which would secure about 25,000 walk-in acres.

Officials say that's a minimum size that's needed.

And other funding ideas -- including adding $3 to $5 to the current $7.50 pheasant stamp or to the small-game license -- have been rejected by many stakeholders.

Pheasants Forever (PF) officials opposed adding a surcharge to the 80,000 to 100,000 pheasant stamps sold yearly.

"We didn't want walk-in funding to take away from any current programs we have," said Joe Pavelko, PF director of conservation. Pheasant stamp money goes to pheasant habitat.

"The $15 endorsement seems to be a pretty good option," Pavelko said. "Then we can let the hunting community decide if it's a good program."

Said Auslund: "I like the idea of a nominal increase across all pheasant hunters. I can't believe pheasant hunters would object to paying an extra $5 to get access to 25,000 acres.''

Pavelko and Auslund are part of a nine-member citizen group that has advised the DNR on the issue. The DNR plans to take the $15 fee proposal to the Legislature soon.

Where's the money?

Whatever happens, hunters will have up to 25,000 walk-in acres available this fall. But there's uncertainty after that. Here's why:

Initial funding came from $2.7 million over three years from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's farm bill. Under the program, landowners who sign up are paid a per-acre fee to allow public hunting. With the federal money, officials had hoped to eventually enroll up to 50,000 acres. Long-term, DNR officials hoped continued federal contributions, along with some type of state contribution in the form of user fees, would support the program.

The DNR enrolled about 9,000 acres, posted florescent green signs on the lands, and opened them to hunting last fall.

"Everyone was surprised at the interest [by hunters] and quality of the lands,'' Block said.

Most of the lands already were enrolled in federal programs such as the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), which meant they were blanketed with prairie grasses and restored wetlands -- prime pheasant and duck habitat.

"Everything went smoothly, until Nov. 19,'' Block said.

That's when a budget-cutting Congress trimmed $1.2 million of funding for the third year of the program, leaving its future in limbo. Congress is working on a new federal farm bill, but state officials have little hope money will be provided for hunter access programs.

Which means it will be up to state hunters.

"It's time to step up or go home,'' said DNR assistant commissioner Bob Meier. "You get what you pay for.''

An opportunity lost?

The DNR has enough federal money for 2012, and might have some left for a partial program in 2013. But they've been trying to sign landowners up for multi-year leases, so funds are needed now. Leases are bargains compared to buying wildlife lands outright, proponents argue.

"It only takes two months to enroll 25,000 acres in the WIA program at a cost of $500,000," Auslund said. "For the state to purchase 25,000 acres, it would cost $125 million at $5,000 an acre and would take 250 years. Funding the walk-in program should be a no-brainer."

Block summed up both the hopes and frustrations.

"After 20 years of talking about it, now we have an answer: It could work here. Now the question is will people pay for it?"

Doug Smith •

  • related content

  • Facts about walk-ins

    Tuesday February 28, 2012

    Officials don't know how many people hunted the 9,000 acres of walk-in land last fall, but based on anecdotal reports, the lands were well-used.

  • Field report: Bills propose wolf hunting and trapping changes

    Wednesday February 29, 2012

    A bill establishing a wolf hunting season in Minnesota will get its first hearing at the Legislature on Thursday.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Team Irvin 7:15 PM
Team Carter
Miami 48 3rd Qtr 11:44
Chicago 38
Oklahoma City 2:30 PM
Dallas 5:00 PM
New Orleans
Indiana 5:00 PM
LA Clippers 5:00 PM
Minnesota 5:00 PM
Detroit 6:00 PM
Milwaukee 6:00 PM
San Antonio
Boston 7:00 PM
Golden State
Washington 7:00 PM
Houston 8:30 PM
LA Lakers
Team Toews 4:00 PM
Team Foligno
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 34 2nd Half 17:39
Georgia Tech 26
Virginia 33 2nd Half 17:04
Virginia Tech 34
Indiana 25 1st Half 4:00
Ohio State 30
Stony Brook 4 1st Half 15:57
Binghamton 6
Cincinnati 3 1st Half 18:14
Maine 7 1st Half 15:23
Hartford 2
Monmouth 7 1st Half 13:33
Manhattan 11
Fairfield 10 1st Half 15:06
Marist 8
Rowan 8 1st Half 13:20
Princeton 8
St Bonaventure 6 1st Half 16:18
Rhode Island 4
Duke 2 1st Half 18:28
St Johns 3
Saint Peters 13 1st Half 13:07
Siena 10
Drake 2 1st Half 16:17
Wichita State 9
Vermont 8 1st Half 14:02
UMass Lowell 7
Seton Hall 2:00 PM
NJIT 2:05 PM
South Alabama
Northern Iowa 3:00 PM
Illinois State
Louisville 3:00 PM
UMBC 3:30 PM
Niagara 3:30 PM
Notre Dame 5:30 PM
NC State
Belmont 5:30 PM
Tennessee St
Creighton 6:00 PM
Northwestern 6:30 PM
Washington 7:30 PM
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 34 2nd Half 14:11
Vanderbilt 37 2nd Half 14:42
Alabama 31
Lafayette 32 2nd Half 15:59
Lehigh 34
Delaware 1:00 PM
Towson 1:00 PM
Iona 1:00 PM
Fairfield 1:00 PM
UCF 2 1st Half 19:25
Utah 2 1st Half 15:18
Washington 14
James Madison 5 1st Half 17:03
Coll of Charleston 1
Hofstra 6 1st Half 15:10
William & Mary 15
Hartford 3 1st Half 16:23
Albany 4
Binghamton 8 1st Half 16:06
Stony Brook 8
Wake Forest 8 1st Half 16:05
(17) Florida State 13
Georgia Tech 6 1st Half 15:41
Virginia 6
(22) Georgia 2 1st Half 14:38
(5) Tennessee 2
Drake 18 1st Half 12:53
Evansville 12
Northwestern 10 1st Half 14:16
Penn State 8
Wisconsin 10 1st Half 12:57
Michigan State 12
Ohio State 7 1st Half 15:59
Purdue 8
Northern Iowa 2 1st Half 16:05
Indiana State 5
Butler 1:30 PM
Creighton 2:00 PM
Providence 2:00 PM
Northeastern 2:00 PM
(2) Connecticut 2:00 PM
Oregon 2:00 PM
Bradley 2:00 PM
NC State 2:00 PM
(23) Syracuse
(7) Maryland 2:00 PM
Illinois State 2:05 PM
Missouri State
Colorado 3:00 PM
Washington St
Tulane 3:00 PM
South Florida
(14) Kentucky 3:00 PM
(9) Oregon State 3:00 PM
(13) Arizona State
Vermont 3:30 PM
UMass Lowell
Iowa State 3:30 PM
(8) Texas
Southern Ill 3:45 PM
Wichita State
(15) Duke 4:00 PM
(12) North Carolina
Miami-Florida 4:00 PM
(4) Louisville
(21) Minnesota 4:15 PM
(25) Rutgers
California 5:00 PM
(11) Stanford 7:00 PM
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question