Rand: Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany stops by for a quick chat

  • Updated: August 23, 2013 - 12:07 AM

Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany said he sees Jerry Kill as a “program builder” and the Big Ten as settled in at 14 teams.

Photo: M. SPENCER GREEN • Associated Press,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany was on the U of M campus Thursday as part of a whirlwind tour of all 12 Big Ten schools. In a session with local media, he touched on a variety of subjects, including the following:

• On Gophers football coach Jerry Kill: “Good football coach. I saw him at Southern Illinois and Northern [Illinois]. He’s a program-builder. You look at his résumé, places he’s been, and you don’t really get a chance to build a program unless you’re there 4-5 years, but obviously a lot of progress has been made. Better recruiting, better players. I think the program is in very good hands.”

• On being in this business while college sports are changing: “If you don’t like change, you wouldn’t like this job. Change is a constant, and it’s always been a constant. There’s even more movement today. … We’re all in a wholly different environment from what we were even 10 years ago. … We have an incredibly popular game. That’s the good news. The bad news is we’re under scrutiny and a lot of regulatory systems that are in effect today were in effect in 1975. Some of us have more resources and would like to do more. We still think we’re in the college sports and education business. We’re not in the professional business. But a lot of us think we could do more for the athletes than we do.”

• On the league’s TV revenue and the Big Ten Network: “It’s been very good for each of the schools. The financial information that we release is cumulative. … I think this year we distributed about $24 million per school. It’s not broken out by ABC, bowl games, ESPN. But BTN has made a substantial contribution.”

• On whether the league will expand beyond 14 teams after Maryland and Rutgers join next year: “It’s done for now. We’re 100 percent working with Rutgers and Maryland to build schedules. I thought we were done at 11. We were there for 20 years, so we weren’t triggering change. We sat comfortably at 11 — not that 11 is a great number to schedule with — but we did, and then the world changed a bit. Most people went to 12. That led to Nebraska, and we settled in again. Expansion continued … and so we thought it was important for us to be in two regions.”

Michael Rand

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Washington 0
Pittsburgh 7 FINAL
Detroit 3
Miami 3 FINAL
St. Louis 2
Boston - WP: K. Couch 11 FINAL
Tampa Bay - LP: C. Reavis 8
NY Yankees - LP: M. Tanaka 1 FINAL
Minnesota - WP: T. Milone 3
Tampa Bay 4 FINAL
Baltimore 3
Philadelphia 6 FINAL
Toronto 10
Chicago Cubs 15 FINAL
Texas 10
Cincinnati - WP: M. Lorenzen 10 FINAL
Milwaukee - LP: M. Fiers 4
Colorado 3 FINAL
San Francisco 4
Chicago WSox 2 FINAL
Los Angeles 1
Seattle 6 FINAL
Cleveland 8
Oakland - WP: J. Fuller 13 FINAL
LA Angels - LP: B. Loconsole 10
Texas 7 FINAL
Arizona 8
Houston 8 FINAL
Atlanta 5
Kansas City 4 FINAL
San Diego 1
Atlanta 95 FINAL
Detroit 105
Indiana 106 FINAL
Brooklyn 111
San Antonio 95 FINAL
Miami 81
Golden State 110 FINAL
LA Clippers 106
New Jersey 2 FINAL(OT)
Columbus 3
Carolina 2 FINAL
Washington 4
Florida 2 FINAL
Boston 3
Ottawa 2 FINAL(SO)
Detroit 1
Tampa Bay 1 FINAL
Toronto 3
NY Rangers 3 FINAL
Winnipeg 2
Vancouver 5 FINAL(SO)
Nashville 4
UT Martin 66 FINAL
Evansville 79
Miami-Florida 60 FINAL
Temple 57
Northern Ariz 68
Stanford 67 FINAL
Old Dominion 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Who are you rooting for in the NCAA Final Four?

Weekly Question