Gophers, Pitino must navigate NCAA transfer gray areas

  • Article by: AMELIA RAYNO , Star Tribune
  • Updated: July 30, 2013 - 6:48 AM

The NCAA's waiver process involves much work, and they aren't always sure things.

hide

Gophers guard Malik Smith was ruled immediately eligible by the NCAA after transferring from Florida International.

Photo: CARLOS GONZALEZ • cgonzalez@startribune.com,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

 

For almost every rule, there is an exception. Extenuating circumstances. Special cases. The world is not black and white, and there is plenty of gray in the middle.

This offseason, the new Gophers men’s basketball coaching staff is taking full advantage of gray areas when it comes to filling out a roster.

Coach Richard Pitino came to the program in April. After two recruits decommitted and Joe Coleman announced he would transfer, Pitino was quickly staring at a depleted team and five available scholarships. Other programs with sitting coaches were way ahead in the game, and most of the solid-to-elite range high school recruits had long since been snatched up.

The solution, at least in part? Find transfers who could be eligible for a waiver from the NCAA to play immediately instead of having to sit out a season, which D-I basketball transfers typically have to do.

The Gophers have two incoming transfers involved with a waiver, Joey King and Malik Smith, and they could possibly seek a third if they land Rakeem Buckles, another transfer.

The school announced earlier this month that Smith will be eligible this season after being granted a waiver because his former school, Florida International, was banned from the postseason because of his team’s inadequate Academic Progress Rate. The Gophers are still gathering materials for King’s waiver, which revolves around a family health concern. King, who played high school ball at Eastview, was a freshman at Drake last season before transferring.

“I don’t think it’s common for basketball programs to do this,” said J.T. Bruett, the University of Minnesota director of compliance. “I do think it’s a result, though, of when Coach Pitino was brought in. … I think you see it more often in coaching changes and things of that nature where they’re a little bit behind at that particular institution.”

There are a few basic types of waivers used for transfers to become immediately eligible, which essentially means their year of establishing residency is waived:

•  Hardship waivers, including illnesses in the family or any other urgent personal circumstance. This is what the Gophers will seek for King.

• Waivers for a student- athlete whose institution is penalized for a violation of which that student had no involvement.

• Waivers for a student whose institution is banned from postseason play for the remainder of that student’s eligibility. This is what the Gophers sought and received for Smith, who has only one year of eligibility left. This could also be a path to land Buckles, a forward and another potential Florida International transfer entering his senior season. Pitino, who knows both players from coaching at FIU last season, inherited the academic mess at the school from his predecessor, Isiah Thomas.

• Waivers for a graduate student who still has a year or more of eligibility remaining.

With many factors to be considered, the information gathering and submitting process are quite extensive. And how the NCAA rules — even in situations that seem identical — can vary greatly from case to case. In 2011-12, the latest year statistics are available, the NCAA approved 27 of 52 undergraduate transfer waivers and six of seven graduate waivers for Division I men’s basketball.

“There’s no such thing as an automatic waiver,” Bruett said. “You still have to put together an argument. … They ask for statements from the student-athlete, they ask for reasoning why a particular student is transferring to a particular institution. Sometimes, a statement from the previous institution or information from the previous institution. … There’s an academic component to it as well, so there’s a lot of different things.”

It usually takes the NCAA two to four weeks to review the waiver, Bruett said, but that can vary depending on the NCAA’s workload as well. Smith’s waiver took approximately two weeks once submitted, but with King’s, a lot of labor is going into information gathering first. King seems to have a good case for a waiver — but then again, these things can be unpredictable.

“It can be hard to predict because every case is different,” Bruett said. “Generally, if we feel like we have a decent case, we’ll submit it, but there will be times when we think we have a very good case and the NCAA denies it and other times we’re not so sure and they approve it.”

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 19 3rd Qtr 1:57
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 109 4th Qtr 0:03
Golden State 113
Washington 105 1st OT
Denver 105
Houston 44 2nd Qtr 3:21
LA Lakers 27
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close