Reusse: Big Ten produces little football talent

  • Article by: PATRICK REUSSE , Star Tribune
  • Updated: May 2, 2013 - 11:57 AM

Few conference football players went high in the NFL draft. And it’s going to get worse before it gets better.

hide

Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson was drafted as a receiver

Photo: Tony Ding, Associated Press

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The Big Ten has been providing a second-rate football product for some time, which was reaffirmed in last week’s NFL draft. You can start with the fact the Big Ten came within one reach by the bumbling Jerry Jones of getting shut out in the first round for the time since 1953.

There were 12 teams in the NFL then. Bernie Flowers, an end from Purdue, was the first pick in the second round (14th overall).

There are now 32 teams. The Big Ten was 0-for-30, until Jones and the Cowboys went for Wisconsin center Travis Frederick. The SEC had 12 players taken in the first round.

Other facts that tell us Big Ten football in its current state is a fraud:

The 12-team conference had 22 players selected, the lowest since an 11-team conference had 21 selected in 1994. The Big Ten is now on a five-draft streak without having a player taken in the top 10.

There were 78 skill position players taken and five came from the Big Ten. This included Michigan’s Denard Robinson, who was drafted as a receiver, not as a quarterback.

The numbers that guarantee the Big Ten’s decline is not a short-term trend are the home states for the draft choices: California 28, Florida 27, Texas 25, Georgia 19, South Carolina 13, Louisiana and Ohio 11, Pennsylvania 9, Alabama 8 and New Jersey, Virginia and North Carolina with 7.

Two decades ago, when the Big Ten was admitting Penn State, Ohio and Pennsylvania still had reputations as elite states for producing football talent. Michigan and Illinois also were offering solid numbers of players.

Now it’s not only Florida producing many more recruits than the big states of the North and Midwest — it’s the rest of Dixie. South Carolina (1 in 363,000), Louisiana (1 in 418,000) and Georgia (1 in 522,000) are raising NFL draft choices at extremely high rates.

It’s culture. In the North, mom and dad are worried about concussions and pointing their boys toward soccer and lacrosse. In the South, the old man still is pounding on his boy’s shoulder pads and saying, “Get out there and smash ’em, son.”

All that heat and vitamin D from the sun are making the young males of the South stronger and faster, and dad is making them tougher.

The strongest, fastest and toughest of those sons of Dixie have two big dreams: to play in the NFL, and before that, to play in the second-best football league in the world … the SEC.

Commissioner Jim Delany and other Big Ten apologists can schmooze as they choose, by citing attendance figures and numbers of households for the Big Ten Network, but the huge competitive gap between his league and the SEC will only increase in the years ahead.

The SEC improved itself in football when it went to 14 teams by adding Texas A&M and Missouri a year ago. The Big Ten is lessening itself in football by going to 14 teams with Rutgers and Maryland a year from now.

Rutgers had seven players taken in last week’s draft. I’m sure Delany is giddy over that. Except those were recruits brought in by Gary Schiano, now with the Tampa Bay Bucs.

Schiano was replaced by an assistant, Kyle Flood. Does the name John Gutekunst ring a bell?

Rutgers will come winging into the Big Ten known more for the scandal of an abusive basketball coach than anything it offers as a football attraction.

The Scarlet Knights’ bowl history consists of appearances in the Garden State, Insight, Texas, International, PapaJohns.com, St. Petersburg, New Era Pinstripe and Russell Athletic bowls.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Portland 0 Postponed
Brooklyn 0
Sacramento 0 Postponed
New York 0
Philadelphia 74 FINAL
New Orleans 99
Minnesota 84 FINAL
Oklahoma City 92
Orlando 94 FINAL
Memphis 103
Boston 99 FINAL
Utah 90
Denver 98 FINAL
LA Clippers 102
Army 68 FINAL
American Univ 66
Wright State 64 FINAL
Detroit 53
Syracuse 83 FINAL
North Carolina 93
Cleveland State 56 FINAL
Oakland 59
Delaware State 54 FINAL
NC Central 55
High Point 63 FINAL
Presbyterian 54
Howard 45 FINAL
Bethune-Cookman 42
Coppin State 84 FINAL
NC A&T 71
Nicholls 51 FINAL
Northwestern St 80
Hampton 56 FINAL
SC State 65
Gardner-Webb 59 FINAL
Campbell 78
MD-Eastern Shore 72 FINAL
Florida A&M 65
Stephen F Austin 82 FINAL
Lamar 65
Central Arkansas 67 FINAL
New Orleans 87
Norfolk State 70 FINAL
Savannah State 54
TX A&M-CC 70 FINAL
SE Louisiana 61
Sam Houston St 80 FINAL
Abilene Christian 63
McNeese State 84 FINAL
Incarnate Word 86
Milwaukee 48 FINAL
Valparaiso 73
Alcorn State 66 FINAL
Alabama A&M 78
Southern U 59 FINAL
Alabama State 63
Prairie View 68 FINAL
Ark-Pine Bluff 105
Texas 86 FINAL
Iowa State 89
Texas Southern 85 FINAL
Miss Valley St 84
Long Island 85 FINAL
Bryant 88
Central Conn St 51 FINAL
St Francis-NY 49
Fairleigh Dickinson 0 Postponed
Sacred Heart 0
St Francis-PA 87 FINAL
Wagner 74
Delaware State 59 FINAL
NC Central 66
Howard 53 FINAL
Bethune-Cookman 61
Coppin State 49 FINAL
NC A&T 67
Hampton 88 FINAL
SC State 53
Norfolk State 54 FINAL
Savannah State 56
MD-Eastern Shore 54 FINAL
Florida A&M 64
Angelo State 55 FINAL
Abilene Christian 70
Samford 32 FINAL
(25) Chattanooga 49
Prairie View 83 FINAL
Ark-Pine Bluff 66
Alcorn State 58 FINAL
Alabama A&M 55
Southern U 53 FINAL
Alabama State 49
Texas Southern 63 FINAL
Miss Valley St 52
(12) Texas A&M 61 FINAL
(1) South Carolina 79
Robert Morris 68 FINAL
Mount St Marys 44
East Tenn St 72 FINAL
Mercer 70
Wofford 56 FINAL
Furman 58
Morehead St 64 FINAL
Tenn Tech 54
Illinois 57 FINAL
Michigan 70
Quinnipiac 0 Postponed
Manhattan 0
Saint Peters 0 Postponed
Rider 0
(18) Miss State 59 FINAL
Auburn 48
(15) Nebraska 72 FINAL
(20) Iowa 78
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close