This is Amelia Rayno's third season on the Gophers men's basketball beat. She learned college basketball in North Carolina (Go Tar Heels!), where fanhood is not an option. In 2010, she joined the Star Tribune after graduating from Boston's Emerson College, which sadly had no exciting D-I college hoops to latch onto. Amelia has also worked on the sports desk at the Boston Globe and interned at the Detroit News.

  Follow Rayno on Twitter @AmeliaRayno

aMAILia BAG: What do the Gophers need to do to beat Michigan? Will Tubby ever change the use of his bench? Are squatches in a different realm?

Posted by: Amelia Rayno under College basketball, Gophers players Updated: January 14, 2013 - 11:36 AM



aMAILia BAG is a weekly installment on this blog where you send me questions and I answer them here. Send your queries to (make sure you sign your email with how you’d like to be mentioned).

Questions below are in bold while my answer are in regular type.

Good morning everyone. It’s been a long week full of travel and highly uncomfortable benches on press row (OK one – at Indiana – but it stuck with me). I’m not hating being back in good ‘ol Minneapolis, but I did discover that Bloomington, IN is my new favorite Big Ten town, despite the over-the-top sells from Madison lovers (we shall see, Madison – it’s your move). Also, what a week of great basketball. I enjoyed every minute of it, but thankfully for me, it’s not ending here – we’ve got quite the matchup vs. (currently) No. 2 Michigan just right around the corner. On that note, let’s get to the questions:

After a tough loss to IU what do the gophers need to do to beat Michigan? How big of a factor will the crowd be?


I can’t wait for this game. I’m interested in seeing a bunch of things --

  • a) How the Gophers respond to their first conference loss of the year and certainly their most disheartening one (with the only other being Duke, of course) after nearly coming back from a 23-point deficit.
  • b) How Michigan responds to their ONLY loss of the year, and weirdly, a very similar one to the Gophers’ after returning from 21. Both teams will be playing with a new ferocity and a loss for either team would be considered a sudden “slide.”
  • c) The atmosphere at the Barn with the Gophers starting out the conference season so successfully. It got pretty loud against Michigan State and Northwestern. What can the fans do when the big, bad Wolverines come to town?

That they get the No. 2 team (which could be changing today) this week presents both a major opportunity to promptly get back on the right track, and also the threat of falling into a two-game slump. Certainly, losing against the top two teams in the conference isn’t a death sentence – but if Minnesota is going to challenge them for the title, they will need to win some games against this competition.

So what are the keys here?

1—Shove off these slow starts. This is quickly becoming a bad habit, but guess what – it is for the Wolverines as well. If the Gophers come out with some fire power and Michigan starts sluggishly, it will be much more difficult for the Wolverines to come back vs. Minnesota’s stingy D. If the Gophers can make their shots early, it allows them to do a lot more things on defense, press if they want to – and with the way Michigan is capable of scoring in bunches, it might be necessary to start out hot just to keep up.

2 – Get out in transition. The Gophers look so much better when they’re running the floor and scoring on the break. Do this please.

3—Limit turnovers. Turnovers have been KILLING the Gophers and played a big role in Minnesota falling so far behind early in the Indiana game. Fifteen-plus is just not acceptable and it’s going to continue to haunt the Gophers if they don’t figure it out.

4—Be aggressive in the paint. On Saturday, the Hoosiers went to the line 40 times vs the Gophers 15. You can attribute some of this to the refs, but not all of it. That’s just really significant, and tough to overcome (particularly if Indiana had done better with its free throws).

5—Defend like crazy. This is a high-powered offense the Gophers are dealing with. Their defense will be tested. My guess is Minnesota will look a lot more air-tight after getting exposed with Indiana’s 65.6 percent shooting in Saturday’s first half.


Will Tubby consider changing the way he utilizes his bench? 1-2 vs. Wholesale.


Everyone loves to ask this, but I highly doubt it. Smith has been doing this for years. And you almost have to analyze around that fact because you know he’s always going to do it. For example, was a key for the Michigan win (above) that Smith limit the number of reserves he has in at a single time? No … because it just won’t happen. I agree with you, but he really likes to do it because he thinks certain teams operate better together because they’re used to playing together.

Hola Ms. Rayno,

Tubby keeps touting this team's depth. Depth is only good if it is playing quality backup minutes, which is not what I've been seeing the past few games. Is the bench really as bad as it's been recently or are they just in a bad stretch?

Jeff (Lino Lakes)

Well, I think one of the main factors here is that Smith is playing his bench much less in general, and with the fewer minutes I think we’re struggling to see players get into the offense at the same level. That said, Smith should not have to play a guy 12 minutes to get some spark out of him – the role of the bench is to be able to come in for short spurts and not allow the lead to crumble and hopefully make a positive effect on the game. Against Indiana, Andre Ingram and Maverick Ahanmisi played a part in one of the Gophers’ first significant runs of the second half. In general, I think those guys have improved individually and as a unit for the most part (particularly Ahanmisi and Oto Osenieks as of late). That said, the “depth” is certainly an area of debate. Those guys have held their own in circumstances, but don’t necessarily validate getting as many minutes as they often do. And if they’re not getting the minutes in chunks, seeing such an overwhelming drop-off in production is a bad sign. Short answer – the bench needs to step it up.

I am surprised you have not mentioned that Ellenson needs to play more, or simply just play. Three reasons for this:

1. He's better than Oto, I know you know this. Oto is supposed to be a good 3pt shooter, maybe he is in practice, but he often looks overwhelmed and frightened to shoot (or do anything) in games, and just airballs like he did today. He played well against MSU, but when proving you have a pulse is the best game of your career to the tune of 4 points and a handful of rebounds I would say he needs to be pushed. Ellenson on the other hand looks fearless, and from the few quotes you have put in the paper he seems pretty desperate to prove himself. Good combination. Ellenson has to be a better shooter (not tough to beat 10 percent) and he is more athletic so at the very least can provide the recent surge of rebounding Oto has decided to provide.

2. We need 3 point shooting. Oto is not providing it, Austin and Andre have been better than expected, but you can never have enough 3 point shooting, and I still think the gophs are missing a pure 3 point shooter that can spot up from anywhere. Ellenson has been advertised as a pure shooter just like Oto was, they need someone to spread things out when the half-court offense gets clogged, which seems to happen a few times a game.

3. I want his brother to come here. I imagine the phone calls home going something like this, "Coach is playing Oto ahead of me, I am a better shooter and more athletic, it makes no sense, but I guess this isn't the first time Tubby has struggled to put the right lineup together." Yikes!

Wow, who are you, Ellenson’s agent? Come on! He’s not only a freshman … he missed almost the entire non-conference schedule. He is, as Smith has constantly reminded us, “way behind” on learning the plays and the system. And he hasn’t proved himself – you don’t get just tossed into the rotation of the nation’s No. 8 team based on one dunk, one free throw and three other makes from the field (compared with 13 attempts, by the way). I do believe that if Ellenson keeps getting minutes and keeps shooting that he’ll figure it out, improve and be a good player for the Gophers. I just don’t think the Big Ten stage is necessarily the place for that sort of experimentation.

That you quickly call him “better than Oto” is baffling to me. Osenieks started out the season slowly, certainly, and the redshirt sophomore isn’t without his limitations, still. But he has improved SIGNIFICANTLY in the past several games (conveniently since Ellenson lost his redshirt). Osenieks waited out his year like Ellenson should have and now Smith trusts him to a degree, based on the experience he’s had the last year and a half. I’m not sure how you “know” that Ellenson is better right now – he certainly was a talented high school player, but this is a different game. And his ceiling isn’t the point; it’s not a matter of who will be a better player in the long run, it’s a matter of who is at the best place right now. That Ellenson is “Fearless and desperate to prove himself“ is not necessarily a great combination. He might be thinking that he wants to prove he belongs in the rotation versus thinking about what is best for the team in that specific play. Ellenson taking shot-after-shot until he finds his touch is NOT in the Gophers’ best interest right now.

Obviously, everyone wants to get Henry Ellenson at the U, and I think that played a big role in Smith agreeing to not redshirt Wally. But he can only work with that family so much. No one should expect him to throw an unseasoned freshman into a team that is cruising so smoothly.

Don’t get me wrong – I think Ellenson has plenty of talent, and will grow into a good player for the Gophers. But you don’t get to miss the non-conference season and pop into the No. 8 team’s rotation in the middle of the toughest stretch of the season unless you’re a game-changing four-or-five-star recruit. And Ellenson is not yet that.

Why are the #gophers so much better in the second half? Outscored NU, Msu, UI, and now IU after halftime


That the Gophers have done that shows two things: Firstly, it’s a trend and not a good one. Secondly, they have been able to adapt, even if it’s not as quickly as desired. That’s another one of those differences between this year’s squad and last year’s. However, taking that long to adjust to defenses (particularly zones) has caused the Gophers some unnecessary stress this season, and certainly the game on Saturday. Why they’re taking so long to get to that point (they attacked the zone pretty well against Indiana in the second half) is hard to say, other than that you hope the neurons fire quicker and quicker as the year goes on. But Minnesota isn’t necessarily unique in that. They have a lot of young guards that are still learning the game. Michigan (see above) has done this in several games this year as well.

How does losing to No. 5 team affect their national standings? #Gophers


Well, it’s not just the Gophers here – you’ve got to look at the teams surrounding them. No. 3 Arizona, No. 1 Duke, No. 12 Illinois and No. 14 (?) Mizzou all lost this week as well. The Gophers might be dropped a spot or two, but it would surprise me if it were more than that. After all, the only two teams Minnesota has lost to this season are the only two teams who have been at No. 1. As far as losses go, those are as strong as you get.

Hi Amelia,

I have a recruiting question I would like your opinion about. There is so much talk about getting players like Tyus Jones, Rashad Vaughn and Reid Travis to enroll at Minnesota. They are very good players, but is it better to recruit kids who will stay in school or kids that will stay a year or two and then turn pro? Isn’t it harder to build a consistent program when your team turns over ever couple years?

Thanks, Mark

That’s never been much of an issue at Minnesota because the Gophers just aren’t getting the caliber of players that would turn over the roster in any dramatic way. So worrying about that with one set of players is silly – if the Gophers can get any/all of those guys, they should jump up and down on a couch like Tom Cruise did when Katie Holmes agreed to marry him. They like me! They like me! They want to ACTUALLY be with me! That would be the mentality. All getting superb, NBA-bound players does is turn the pressure up to continue to recruit well (and that’s a pretty good tool for that, by the way) … but that’s a conversation not worth having until the Gophers actually have a player leave early, you know, this century.


What is a group of squatches called? Herd?


… You’ve got me there. A happy family? Big but invisible? Frightening as hell? Other than that, I don’t know.

Have you heard of this theory before?

One fringe theory, supported by paranormal investigator Jon-Erik Beckjord, theorizes that the lack of hard evidence supporting Bigfoot's existence may be due to the creature being an interdimensional being that slips in and out of dimensions.

Casey O’Rourke

I have heard all about that theory, and there were some Native American tribes who subscribed to that thinking as well (to explain their elusiveness), but I’m not buying it. I want a real, solid, huge animal in this dimension. Squatches aren't magic – they’re smart.


Golden State 99 FINAL
Cleveland 110
Oklahoma City 113 FINAL
Phoenix 117
Vancouver 3 FINAL
Buffalo 6
Arizona 3 FINAL
NY Rangers 4
Montreal 5 FINAL
Columbus 2
Philadelphia 2 FINAL
Toronto 3
Chicago 3 FINAL
Florida 0
St. Louis 2 FINAL(SO)
Winnipeg 1
Minnesota 4 FINAL
Nashville 2
Ottawa 1 FINAL
Los Angeles 0
Detroit 3 FINAL
San Jose 2
Northern Ky 78 FINAL
Kennesaw St 53
East Tenn St 73 FINAL
Citadel 74
Winthrop 50 FINAL
Campbell 65
Delaware 58 FINAL
Drexel 44
Jacksonville St 57 FINAL
Eastern Ky 63
Northeastern 65 FINAL
Elon 72
Sacred Heart 90 FINAL
Fair-Dickinson 85
Western Carolina 49 FINAL
Furman 53
Char Southern 81 FINAL
Gardner-Webb 91
Western Ill 66 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 73 FINAL
IUPU-Ft Wayne 67
Radford 69 FINAL
Liberty 80
St Francis-NY 74 FINAL
Long Island 69
Wofford 76 FINAL
Mercer 72
Minnesota 96 FINAL
Michigan State 90
High Point 75 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 71
Samford 67 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 81
Nebraska 57 FINAL
Ohio State 81
Wagner 59 FINAL
Robert Morris 91
Mount St Marys 60 FINAL
St Francis-PA 63
Houston 54 FINAL
Temple 66
Vanderbilt 73 FINAL
Tennessee 65
Chattanooga 86 FINAL
Va Military 82
Milwaukee 61 FINAL
Wright State 58
Coastal Carolina 69 FINAL
Presbyterian 80
Central Conn St 69 FINAL
Bryant 77
Ga Southern 77 FINAL
Appalachian St 58
SIU Edwardsville 61 FINAL
Austin Peay 64
Green Bay 72 FINAL
Ill-Chicago 67
Texas-El Paso 60 FINAL
Louisiana Tech 77
Marshall 87
Rider 63 FINAL
Monmouth 60
Eastern Ill 57 FINAL
Murray State 65
Charlotte 65 FINAL
North Texas 81
North Dakota St 58 FINAL
Oral Roberts 74
Old Dominion 63 FINAL
Rice 54
TX-San Antonio 66 FINAL
Southern Miss 70
UT Martin 69 FINAL
Tennessee St 52
Fla Atlantic 68 FINAL
Western Ky 71
Northern Ariz 85 FINAL
North Dakota 75
Grand Canyon 70 FINAL
Chicago State 74
Utah Valley U 50 FINAL
South Alabama 57
Texas-Arlington 80 FINAL
Arkansas State 81
Georgia State 83 FINAL
Ark-Little Rock 92
Troy 61 FINAL
Texas State 67
Arizona 82 FINAL
Colorado 54
Memphis 57
Tenn Tech 73 FINAL
Morehead State 86
Rutgers 85 FINAL
Purdue 92
Southern Utah 67 FINAL
Northern Colorado 77
Montana State 68 FINAL
Eastern Wash 92
UC Davis 60 FINAL
UC Santa Barbara 74
UC Irvine 63 FINAL
Cal Poly 56
Cal State Fullerton 72 FINAL
CS-Northridge 82
Montana 87 FINAL
Idaho 92
Portland 69
Pacific 64 FINAL
Santa Clara 57
Arizona State 41 FINAL
Utah 83
San Diego 39 FINAL
Gonzaga 59
St Marys-CA 84 FINAL
San Francisco 53
Oregon State 48 FINAL
Stanford 75
Long Beach State 59 FINAL
Hawaii 78
Rice 68 FINAL
Old Dominion 83
Manhattan 67 FINAL
Monmouth 84
Georgia Southern 39 FINAL
Appalachian St 66
Marshall 74 FINAL
FIU 50
TX-Arlington 62 FINAL
Arkansas State 67
South Alabama 38
Troy 75 FINAL
Texas State 59
Georgia State 39 FINAL
Ark-Little Rock 56
William & Mary 84 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 55
Delaware 68 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Maine 61
UMass Lowell 72 FINAL
Vermont 64
Albany 65 FINAL
Hartford 50
Stony Brook 68 FINAL
Binghamton 59
Boston College 60 FINAL
(8) Louisville 77
(23) Syracuse 60 FINAL
Clemson 55
(16) Duke 62 FINAL
Georgia Tech 71
Florida 53 FINAL
Alabama 49
NC State 52 FINAL
(9) Florida State 72
Miami-Florida 59 FINAL
Wake Forest 60
Ole Miss 58
(11) Miss State 50 FINAL
(2) South Carolina 69
Fairfield 74 FINAL
Iona 62
Marist 58 FINAL
Saint Peters 66
Quinnipiac 91 FINAL
Rider 53
Virginia 70 FINAL
(15) North Carolina 72
Pittsburgh 59 FINAL
(4) Notre Dame 87
Ohio State 88 FINAL
Penn State 70
Massachusetts 60 FINAL
Dayton 69
(22) George Washington 81 FINAL
Richmond 69
Saint Louis 53 FINAL
Rhode Island 68
Wright State 74 FINAL
Detroit 59
Green Bay 70 FINAL
Oakland 55
Western Ky 85 FINAL
Florida Atlantic 74
Indiana 72 FINAL
(5) Maryland 83
North Texas 46 FINAL
Charlotte 71
Central Arkansas 64 FINAL
Sam Houston St 56
SE Louisiana 60 FINAL
Northwestern St 71
Nicholls 63 FINAL
New Orleans 68
Incarnate Word 44 FINAL
Stephen F Austin 58
Denver 68 FINAL
No Dakota State 87
IUPU-Ft Wayne 61 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 70
South Dakota 69
Lamar 77 FINAL
McNeese State 98
Western Ill 49 FINAL
South Dakota St 69
Missouri 70 FINAL
(12) Texas A&M 69
(13) Kentucky 56 FINAL
Arkansas 51
(20) Rutgers 60 FINAL
(25) Northwestern 80
Southern Miss 61 FINAL
TX-San Antonio 59
Wisconsin 74 FINAL
(17) Iowa 78
North Dakota 68 FINAL
Northern Ariz 72
Northern Colorado 88 FINAL
Southern Utah 66
Louisiana Tech 0 Postponed
Texas-El Paso 0
Eastern Washington 53 FINAL
Montana State 63
Idaho 68 FINAL
Montana 81
Auburn 70 FINAL
Vanderbilt 58
(6) Tennessee 70 FINAL
Georgia 59
Gonzaga 62 FINAL
San Diego 75
Washington 60
Portland 63 FINAL
BYU 65
(24) California 74 FINAL
Oregon 59
(19) Stanford 69 FINAL
(7) Oregon State 58
Chicago State 49 FINAL
Grand Canyon 73
Utah Valley U 61
San Francisco 65 FINAL
St Marys-CA 62
Washington St 69
Santa Clara 75 FINAL
Pacific 87
CS-Northridge 65 FINAL
Cal State Fullerton 53
UC Santa Barbara 47 FINAL
Cal-Irvine 57
Hawaii 47 FINAL
Long Beach St 46
Cal Poly 68 FINAL
UC Davis 50
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Who is the best center on a Twin Cities sports team?

Weekly Question