Scoggins: Lowering hoop for women's basketball a bad idea

  • Article by: CHIP SCOGGINS , Star Tribune
  • Updated: October 31, 2012 - 2:10 PM

 Top college coach has a radical idea to improve sport.

Hopkins girls' basketball star Nia Coffey can dunk a tennis ball on a regulation 10-foot hoop. Maybe even a volleyball, her coach said.

The 6-1 guard can't quite dunk a basketball, though. But what if the rim were lowered seven inches, as proposed by UConn women's basketball coach Geno Auriemma?

"I think I could [dunk]," she said.

While Coffey said she finds the idea of lowering the rim "really bizarre," it piqued her curiosity.

"I would be willing to try it. It's really intriguing," said Coffey, the daughter of former Gophers basketball player Richard Coffey. "I feel like so many girls are close to dunking and maybe that would make it more exciting."

Presumably, that is partly what Auriemma had in mind when he recently floated his radical idea to improve the product and attendance in women's basketball. Auriemma wants to lower rims because he believes that would result in fewer missed layups, more scoring, more plays above the rim, better shooting and generally a more palatable game for fans to watch.

"What makes fans not want to watch women's basketball is that some of the players can't shoot and they miss layups and that forces the game to slow down," Auriemma told the Hartford Courant. "Do you think the average fan knows that the net is lower in women's volleyball than men's volleyball? It's about seven inches shorter so the women have the chance for the same kind of success at the net [as the men]."

Auriemma plans to propose his idea -- along with a few others -- to the NCAA rules committee next spring. He probably won't find much support based on reactions nationwide and locally.

"I was completely caught off guard," Gophers women's coach Pam Borton said. "I was just like, 'Wow, this is really out of the box.' "

Auriemma is a powerful figure in the sport and his words carry significant weight. He has won seven national championships at UConn and led the U.S. Olympic women's team to the gold medal in London. His résumé gives him a large platform to sway opinions and effect change.

He certainly deserves credit for trying to elevate the women's game and address attendance concerns, but his proposal is neither practical nor a realistic means to grow the sport's mass appeal.

Lowering the rims likely would accomplish his intended desire of improving offensive production, but it won't make women's basketball any more popular, at least not in a meaningful way. That's not a knock on women's basketball, just reality.

Plus, not every gym in America is configured with baskets that can be raised and lowered. That logistical hurdle would make it cost- prohibitive if discussion gained any traction among NCAA leaders.

"If it is [considered]," Borton said, "it is way, way, way down the road."

Borton's primary objection with the idea is that it seeks to make women's basketball something it's not.

"I really don't think we have to be the men's game," she said.

Borton noted that women's basketball is decades behind the men's game in its history. The women's game still is developing in terms of participation, athleticism, skill level and year-round commitment at youth levels. There are more good-to-elite players now than even five, 10 years ago and that trend should continue to climb as AAU and traveling basketball create opportunities for intensive training.

"In my 14 years [as Hopkins girls coach], it's gotten dramatically better, and I have some girls now who are playing at rim level," Brian Cosgriff said. "I think the training methods now in terms of strength and conditioning are better. I just think in a few years we'll have more people playing above the rim."

Borton doesn't discount Auriemma's points about growing fan attendance. She shares those concerns. A struggling economy and high-definition television have affected all sports at the ticket gate. It's just easier, cheaper and more relaxing to stay home and watch a game on our big screen these days.

Rather than introduce radical rules changes, Borton said, women's basketball needs to find new, creative ways to market itself to attract fans.

"I think as marketing departments and marketing your school, we have to really change [ways] of thinking to get people to have a great experience at your games," she said. "Marketing is different than what it was five years ago. We have to be ahead of the times and we have to be thinking like that and not archaic. We have to change."

Change is good, but within reason. Lowering rims is not the answer.

Chip Scoggins • ascoggins@startribune.com

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close