Glass ceiling on female ADs rarely gets broken

  • Article by: PHIL MILLER , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 29, 2012 - 10:37 PM

Diversity is a prime consideration for Minnesota's job, yet only three women currently run athletic departments at the BCS level.

hide

orth Carolina State athletic director Debbie Yow (left) previously was AD at Maryland and has overseen several professional organizations.

Photo: Ethan Hyman, MCT

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Sandy Barbour had been Cal's athletic director for less than three months in 2004, had barely moved into her new office, and already Bay Area skepticism about her had ramped up into four-alarm panic.

Only three years removed from a 1-10 catastrophe, Jeff Tedford had turned Cal football into a national-title contender. For his miracle turnaround, Tedford was rumored to be the leading candidate for openings all over college football and even the NFL -- and it was up to Barbour, a newcomer from Tulane, to keep him.

"People were really worried, but in the end, I was able to re-sign him to a new long-term contract and keep him at Cal," Barbour said. "All the boosters exhaled, and said, 'Oh, OK, maybe this is a good thing.' ... I never doubted my ability, but [signing Tedford] gave me credibility with people who did."

And there are a lot of those doubters in major-college sports, judging by the numbers. Though the NCAA says nearly 45 percent of varsity athletes are female, it's much rarer to find a woman in charge. Only 36 universities of the 347 that play Division I basketball have athletic departments headed by women, and only five of them are among the 120 schools that field teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision. And at the BCS level? Barbour is one of three, along with Arizona State's Lisa Love and N.C. State's Debbie Yow.

Most Big Ten schools haven't had a women in charge of a department that included men's athletics; Merrily Dean Baker, a somewhat recent anomaly, ran Michigan State's sports programs from 1992-95. Minnesota is currently in the process of searching for a new leader of its 25-sport athletic department to replace Joel Maturi, who is retiring after a decade in Bierman Hall. Would the Gophers consider putting a woman in charge?

In two news conferences dealing with Maturi's eventual successor, university president Eric Kaler, who will make the final decision on Maturi's successor, has notably never used the pronoun "he" to describe the next AD, and he confirmed through a spokesman that the candidate pool will include "diversity in experience, background, gender and race."

"I'm open to qualified candidates from really a wide range of backgrounds," Kaler said last week in announcing a search committee to aid in the hiring. "We want the best qualified person in the United States to take this job."

Since Love's hiring in 2005, however, the only major university to hire a women for that job in the past six years was N.C. State, which lured Yow away from Maryland, where she had been in charge since 1994.

"It's taking a long time, unfortunately," Barbour said, for women to close that gap. "It's been the five of us [at FBS schools] for some time now."

Would Gophers fans and boosters, thirsty for turnarounds in the bottom-half-of-the-Big-Ten results turned in by their football and basketball teams, support putting a female in charge?

"I would think that Minnesotans want a great leader running their program, that's the most important thing," said Chris Voelz, whose Athletics-Plus consulting firm trains female sports executives in the finer points of athletic fund-raising. "You have so many strong female leaders in Minnesota, and there is such a history of giving there, I'm sure a woman could succeed."

What might have been

There was a time when Voelz believed that woman would be her; when she was hired to oversee women's sports in Minnesota in 1988, then-president Nils Hasselmo told her that the separate men's and women's departments would eventually be combined under her leadership.

When unification finally came in 2002, however, Hasselmo was no longer president. Voelz, who had considerable success in raising money, expanding women's sports infrastructure and winning championships, opposed the timing of the merger and left the university when Maturi was hired.

Since then, she has campaigned for increased opportunities for women in sports as a fundraiser and ambassador for the Women's Sports Foundation. She doesn't miss the job, Voelz said -- "I've had less stress in the past 10 years than in one week at the university," she jokes -- but is frustrated that more women haven't been given a similar opportunity.

The reason, she suspects, is football.

"I remember when I was an aspiring athletics director, people would say, 'Chris, you don't know football.' And I would look around the table when I was [senior associate AD] at Oregon, and I was the only one who had been a coach. The only one!" Voelz said. "What happens is, university presidents hire males because they look like football players. Not on purpose, it just culturally happens. They assume because he's a man, he must know football."

That's why the football credibility she gained by retaining Tedford was so critical to Barbour when she came to Cal.

"I'm a former field hockey coach, and there were [boosters] who needed to know, OK, she's not going to try to turn this into Field Hockey U. She understands the place that football holds on this campus," said Barbour, who holds an MBA along with her academic and athletic credentials. "And when they realize that, it kind of all goes away. And then the job is just the regular hard."

The revenues that football provides, which dwarf all other sports at the BCS level, make that sport priority No. 1 in most places, and it's why Love hired Dennis Erickson as head coach in 2007, then replaced him with Todd Graham in December when Erickson went without a winning record for four seasons.

"Managing football is the biggest part of the job. Internally, dealing with football coaches, that's never been an issue," said Love, a former USC volleyball coach and senior administrator. "But connecting to the primary donors and boosters, that's very important to the economics of the success of the overall program. A woman perhaps has to work a little bit harder to get connected in that regard because it's atypical. And maybe there isn't quite as much forgiveness if everything isn't perfect. But there are pretty high standards in this job, no matter who is in it, male or female."

Barbour said she knows "literally dozens of qualified women with sports-administration backgrounds" who could excel at the job, "and we're working with the executive search firms to identify them. It's a matter of getting the opportunity, and I think we have more qualified candidates than ever before."

But not everyone relishes such a high-profile job, Love noted.

"I've got so many colleagues around the country who are first lieutenants. They could do the job, but they don't aspire to it."

It's odd, Voelz said, that in an academic setting, where diversity is valued so highly in so many areas, that athletic administration could lag so far behind, four decades after Title IX increased opportunities for female athletes.

"We keep saying a president who makes that decision is ahead of their time," Voelz said. "Well, when is it time?"

  • related content

  • Chart: Meet the three female ADs

    Wednesday February 29, 2012

    Only three schools in BCS conferences have females at the top of their athletic departments. A quick look at the three:

  • GOPHERS LOOKING FOR NEW AD WOMEN ATHLETIC DIRECTORS

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 7:15 PM
Team Carter
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 2 1st Qtr 10:31
New Orleans 4
Indiana 4 1st Qtr 9:12
Orlando 8
LA Clippers 0 1st Qtr 9:59
Phoenix 4
Minnesota 5 1st Qtr 10:19
Atlanta 4
Detroit 6:00 PM
Toronto
Milwaukee 6:00 PM
San Antonio
Boston 7:00 PM
Golden State
Washington 7:00 PM
Denver
Houston 8:30 PM
LA Lakers
Team Toews 4 2nd Prd
Team Foligno 4
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 40 2nd Half 10:03
Albany 57
Niagara 35 2nd Half 15:13
Iona 50
Notre Dame 5:30 PM
NC State
Belmont 5:30 PM
Tennessee St
Creighton 6:00 PM
Villanova
Northwestern 6:30 PM
Maryland
Washington 7:30 PM
Utah
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 54 2nd Half 3:20
UMass Lowell 62
Iowa State 50 2nd Half 5:00
(8) Texas 49
Southern Ill 50 2nd Half 8:00
Wichita State 56
(15) Duke 28 2nd Half
(12) North Carolina 38
Miami-Florida 31 2nd Half 20:00
(4) Louisville 27
(21) Minnesota 31 2nd Half
(25) Rutgers 37
California 6:00 PM
UCLA
(11) Stanford 7:00 PM
USC
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close