Amelia Rayno's Basketball Insider: A pool full of pickers

  • Updated: February 24, 2012 - 10:33 PM

NCAA handicappers Joe Lunardi and Jerry Palm set the bar, but many others also spread the gospel of the seasonal and highly scrutinized field of bracketology.


Ralph Sampson III

Photo: Marlin Levison, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Jerry Palm remembers when the all the people interested in Rating Percentage Index and NCAA brackets could "fit comfortably in a minivan," as he likes to joke.

That was before the basketball world was swept up by this statistical storm, which is brewing stronger these days.

"People just hunger for this information," said Palm, one of the earliest examples of a "bracketologist," now a well-known term. "My Twitter feed blows up this time of year."

Perhaps that's because the general public is starting to catch on. The NCAA has worked harder to publicize the method it uses to select the 68 teams for the men's basketball tournament -- a process many have perceived as a complicated one. They've opened a yearly mock draft to the media to help spread awareness, which has, as a byproduct, spread interest as well.

But when Palm first started calculating and updating strengths and weaknesses of teams and projecting that into bracket form, he said he and ESPN's Joe Lunardi were the only ones doing it. "Now I think there's like 80 people -- anybody with a computer and too much time on their hands is doing it," he said.

It has become such a fad that a burgeoning number of basketball fans is growing more dissatisfied with the modest tools -- mainly RPI, the formula the selection committee uses to weigh teams against each other. Palm, who works for, had Minnesota at No. 76 as of Friday, with an RPI of 0.5612, a tumble from a couple of weeks ago when the Gophers were projected to make the NCAA field. Syracuse is No. 1, followed by Michigan State.

Palm said the two most common complaints he hears are opposites. Ether people are annoyed that a formula of any type is being used to help pick teams for the tournament, or they want something that takes into account more than the three components that determine RPI: team record, opponents' record and the record of their opponents' opponents.

But Palm says those pleas are both off base because the selection process needs some structure -- and just as important, the simplicity of that structure is key. Despite some flaws -- for example, RPI weighs home and road games too distinctly, Palm said, and it completely ignores any games played outside of Division I -- Palm thinks the original system is still probably the best one.

"They don't really need anything more sophisticated than that, and I don't really think anybody wants a computer making the decision," he said. "And the more sophisticated of a computer ranking system you use, the more people will expect you to use that to make the decisions. I think it's good enough for how it's being used. Because they want to measure how teams do against good competition. And you look at the top 50 RPI teams and the top 50 Sagarin [rankings] teams and the top 50 whatever ranking system you want to look at, you're going to see roughly the same 50 teams."

  • related content

  • Amelia Rayno's Big Ten power poll: Feb. 25

    Friday February 24, 2012

    1. Michigan State (12-3): Sparty's six-game win streak ties the longest in the league and they're going strong.2. Michigan (11-4):...

  • Amelia Rayno's Short Takes: Feb. 25

    Friday February 24, 2012

    When William Buford is on, he's on. And when he's not, he's something of a liability. In Ohio State's past four games, Buford has scored 17 points, six points, 24...

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Toronto 104 FINAL
Indiana 91
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Detroit 95
Milwaukee 109 FINAL
Miami 102
Memphis 109 FINAL
Dallas 90
Chicago 107 1st OT
Golden State 107
Washington 98 FINAL
LA Lakers 92
NY Rangers 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 4
Arizona 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Washington 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Carolina 4
Dallas 2 FINAL
Montreal 3
Detroit 5 FINAL
Florida 4
Colorado 3 FINAL(OT)
Nashville 4
Buffalo 1 FINAL
Calgary 4
Minnesota 2 FINAL
Edmonton 1
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Ball State 47 FINAL
Akron 59
Northern Ill 46 FINAL
Bowling Green 56
Western Mich 71 FINAL
Buffalo 77
Ohio 40 FINAL
Eastern Mich 76
Xavier 66 FINAL
Georgetown 53
Vanderbilt 62 FINAL
Georgia 70
West Virginia 65 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Central Mich 53 FINAL
Kent State 63
Saint Josephs 48 FINAL
La Salle 53
Nebraska 44 FINAL
Michigan 58
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Toledo 70
Tulsa 62 FINAL
Tulane 55
George Washington 48 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 72
Pittsburgh 67 FINAL
Virginia Tech 70
Indiana State 78 FINAL
Evansville 89
Tabor College 53 FINAL
Oral Roberts 94
Florida 52 FINAL
Alabama 50
Tennessee 64 FINAL
Arkansas 69
Texas A&M 71 FINAL
Auburn 61
Baylor 53 FINAL
Oklahoma State 64
DePaul 0 Postponed
Providence 0
Michigan State 0 Postponed
Rutgers 0
Wyoming 44 FINAL
Utah State 56
Fresno State 47 FINAL
San Diego St 58
Nevada 62
SD Christian 54 FINAL
CS-Bakersfield 79
Colorado State 73 2nd Half 2:54
Boise State 68
Temple 71 FINAL
UCF 54
Campbell 42 FINAL
Presbyterian 51
Coastal Carolina 65 FINAL
High Point 73
Gardner-Webb 49 FINAL
Radford 59
UNC-Asheville 58 FINAL
Liberty 62
Winthrop 63 FINAL
Longwood 62
Columbia International 33 FINAL
Charleston Southern 74
Tulane 63 FINAL
Houston 46
(3) Baylor 89 FINAL
TCU 67
Navy 49 FINAL
American Univ 59
Valparaiso 42 FINAL
Illinois-Chicago 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question