Saturday: U offers to swap land for stadium

  • Article by: MARY JANE SMETANKA and CONRAD DEFIEBRE , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 27, 2006 - 6:11 PM

A new plan calls for the U to swap some Rosemount land for more state financing support.

A new proposal to fund an on-campus football stadium at the University of Minnesota would swap 2,840 acres of U-owned land near Rosemount for a bigger state contribution for a stadium.

The plan, unveiled Friday evening, is for the state to pay $9.4 million a year for 25 years to finance bonds for a stadium. In return, the state would own the land after 25 years and create a nature preserve. The land in the Vermillion River watershed contains a trout stream, forests, rolling hills and trails for horseback riders.

"This legislation is a win-win for the university and the entire state," U President Robert Bruininks said.

"It will result in some of the most beautiful, undeveloped land in the region being protected for generations to come, and it will provide the financing we need to bring Gopher football back to campus," the president's statement continued.

The university's Board of Regents will meet Monday to consider the plan. Committee hearings on the proposal are set for Tuesday in the Minnesota Senate and Wednesday in the House.

State Rep. Dennis McNamara, R-Hastings, said he and Rep. Dennis Ozment, R-Rosemount, approached university officials about the idea after it was suggested to him about 10 days ago by a leader of the hunting advocacy group Pheasants Forever.

"This is a once-in-forever opportunity for the state of Minnesota," said McNamara, who grew up near the land. "It's some of the most prime, diverse, beautiful land in Minnesota, a real outdoor environment a half-hour from the downtown areas."

A park-like parcel

The university has owned 7,700 acres of land near Rosemount since it was donated by the federal government in 1947. Called UMore Park, it includes the site of a former munitions factory as well as farm fields, research buildings and the park-like land that would go to the state. The university has been studying what to do with the land, which once was isolated but now is bordered by fast-developing suburbs. In some areas it is worth upwards of $35,000 an acre.

A previous stadium proposal had the state paying $7.4 million annually in debt service for 25 years, putting 60 percent of the stadium's $249 million cost on the university. Under the new plan, the additional $2 million that the state would pay each year essentially splits the cost of an open-air, 50,000-seat stadium equally between the state and the school, said Richard Pfutzenreuter, the university's chief financial officer.

It also would allow the university to trim in half its proposed $100-a-year student fee for the stadium. The fee has recently become a focus of legislative criticism of the project.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty, legislative leaders, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Metropolitan Council were involved in negotiations over the project, McNamara said. Other legislators were informed of it at 4:30 p.m. Friday via an e-mail signed by Rep. Ron Abrams, R-Minnetonka; House Deputy Minority Leader Margaret Anderson Kelliher, DFL-Minneapolis; Senate President James Metzen, DFL-South St. Paul, and Sen. Geoff Michel, R-Edina.

"The bipartisan leadership for this proposal is very encouraging," said a news release from Pawlenty. "I urge legislators to support this win-win for the state and the university."

Michel is a sponsor of stadium legislation that has been stalled since last year. "We get more than a stadium now," he said. "This is a good first down. We're getting closer to the end zone."

While university officials valued the land at $15,000 an acre, or a total of $42 million, McNamara said its real worth could be more than $100 million.

Under the proposal, the DNR would manage the land for public access over the 25-year payment period while the university retained ownership, McNamara said. Once the payments were complete, he said, the state would take title. The U would retain the right to conduct research on the land in perpetuity.

Sen. Larry Pogemiller, DFL-Minneapolis, has called for elimination of a naming-rights deal with TCF Financial Corp. that would contribute $35 million to the project. Pogemiller could not be reached for comment Friday. The new proposal does not affect the U's agreement with TCF.

If a stadium law passes, the university immediately would start road work in preparation for stadium construction. Officials want the stadium to open in fall 2009.

  • A new idea calls for the U to swap some Rosemount land for more state financing support.
  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close