Jan. 1, 2006: Mason, U agree to 5-year contract

  • Article by: CHIP SCOGGINS , Star Tribune
  • Updated: December 31, 2006 - 1:52 PM

After a lengthy, sometimes frustrating process for both sides, the football coach and his employers settled on a new five-year contract worth $1.65 million annually in direct and deferred compensation.

The stalemate is over.

Finally.

It took a lot longer than anyone wanted or expected, but the University of Minnesota and football coach Glen Mason reached an agreement on a contract Saturday night.

Pushing negotiations to the 11th hour, the sides reached an agreement on a new five-year contract, thus avoiding a potential doomsday scenario in which the university and Mason would part ways.

The agreement is worth about $1.65 million annually in direct and deferred compensation and will keep Mason in place through the 2010 season. Mason also has a chance to earn an additional $750,000 in performance bonuses, involving Big Ten championships, national rankings and graduation rates.

"I can't adequately express how happy I am, speaking not only for me but for my family and coaching staff, that we will be able to continue making progress in our football program and also be able to live and raise our families in the great state of Minnesota," Mason said in a statement.

"I take great pride in being the head coach at the University of Minnesota and could not be more excited about working with [athletic director] Joel [Maturi] and President [Bob] Bruininks toward goals all Minnesotans want to achieve."

The sides reached the deal only hours before contracts for Mason's assistant coaches were to expire. The university was prepared to present the assistants with notices of nonrenewal if an agreement was not reached. That might have triggered Mason's departure after nine seasons at Minnesota.

Instead, the sides were able to bridge the gap.

"I'm ecstatic and Glen's ecstatic," Maturi said.

The deal, which is expected to be finalized Tuesday, calls for $1.35 million annually in guaranteed salary. Mason will earn another $300,000 in retirement and deferred compensation. The performance incentives could push the value of the deal over $2 million annually. Mason was believed to be seeking guaranteed money in the neighborhood of $1.8 million.

The debate over how much money should be guaranteed caused negotiations to drag on for over a month and created tough talk and a swirl of media attention that overshadowed the Music City Bowl festivities last week.

Both sides said negotiations remained amicable throughout the past month, but both clearly dug in their heels over what they considered to be a fair and competitive deal.

"I'm very pleased that these lengthy negotiations were concluded successfully," said University General Counsel Mark Rotenberg, who negotiated the deal.

Now that it's over, the parties have some fences to mend. Mason's contract uncertainty created tension inside the athletic department this season. Maturi disputed claims of a rift between him and Mason.

"Things were never not amicable between Glen and I," Maturi said. "I've said all along that I wanted him to be our coach. I've been consistent in saying that. And he's said all along that he wanted to stay here."

Asked Friday if he ever doubted whether the university wanted him to return, Mason paused for a few seconds before saying, "No, because I don't know why they wouldn't want me to come back."

Said Bruininks in a statement: "I'm pleased that we have successfully negotiated ... Coach Mason's contract. Under his leadership, Gopher football has been taken to new levels and we are looking forward to an even stronger future."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Toronto 104 FINAL
Indiana 91
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Detroit 95
Milwaukee 109 FINAL
Miami 102
Memphis 109 FINAL
Dallas 90
Chicago 113 FINAL
Golden State 111
Washington 98 FINAL
LA Lakers 92
NY Rangers 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 4
Arizona 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Washington 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Carolina 4
Dallas 2 FINAL
Montreal 3
Detroit 5 FINAL
Florida 4
Colorado 3 FINAL(OT)
Nashville 4
Buffalo 1 FINAL
Calgary 4
Minnesota 2 FINAL
Edmonton 1
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Ball State 47 FINAL
Akron 59
Northern Ill 46 FINAL
Bowling Green 56
Western Mich 71 FINAL
Buffalo 77
Ohio 40 FINAL
Eastern Mich 76
Xavier 66 FINAL
Georgetown 53
Vanderbilt 62 FINAL
Georgia 70
West Virginia 65 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Central Mich 53 FINAL
Kent State 63
Saint Josephs 48 FINAL
La Salle 53
Nebraska 44 FINAL
Michigan 58
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Toledo 70
Tulsa 62 FINAL
Tulane 55
George Washington 48 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 72
Pittsburgh 67 FINAL
Virginia Tech 70
Indiana State 78 FINAL
Evansville 89
Tabor College 53 FINAL
Oral Roberts 94
Florida 52 FINAL
Alabama 50
Tennessee 64 FINAL
Arkansas 69
Texas A&M 71 FINAL
Auburn 61
Baylor 53 FINAL
Oklahoma State 64
DePaul 0 Postponed
Providence 0
Michigan State 0 Postponed
Rutgers 0
Wyoming 44 FINAL
Utah State 56
Fresno State 47 FINAL
San Diego St 58
UNLV 67 FINAL
Nevada 62
SD Christian 54 FINAL
CS-Bakersfield 79
Colorado State 78 FINAL
Boise State 82
Temple 71 FINAL
UCF 54
Campbell 42 FINAL
Presbyterian 51
Coastal Carolina 65 FINAL
High Point 73
Gardner-Webb 49 FINAL
Radford 59
UNC-Asheville 58 FINAL
Liberty 62
Winthrop 63 FINAL
Longwood 62
Columbia International 33 FINAL
Charleston Southern 74
Tulane 63 FINAL
Houston 46
(3) Baylor 89 FINAL
TCU 67
Navy 49 FINAL
American Univ 59
Valparaiso 42 FINAL
Illinois-Chicago 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close