Gone are the days when three hours to play championship golf was reasonable

  • Article by: DOUG FERGUSON , AP Golf Writer
  • Updated: June 11, 2013 - 4:50 PM

ARDMORE, Pa. — There is no reason golf should take this long to play.

That's why players at Merion for the U.S. Open received a notice when they registered that warned about pace of play. The fear was that slow play was damaging the game's popularity, and the instructions in the notice could not have been clearer.

"Be observant, reach your decision quickly and execute your shots with promptness and dispatch."

Just don't get the idea anything will change. This notice was handed out at 1950 U.S. Open.

If the players at the U.S. Open this week would read David Barrett's book, "Miracle at Merion," on Ben Hogan's victory at 1950, they might laugh.

Or maybe cry.

Joe Dey, the USGA's executive director at the time, is quoted in the book as saying, "The time has come when we simply must act if the game is not to be seriously injured."

The size of the field for the 1948 U.S. Open at Riviera was 171 players. It was lowered to 162 players the following year at Medinah, but that didn't seem to help. Dey lamented that the first group (threesomes) took 3 hours, 27 minutes to complete the opening round, while the last group took a whopping 4 hours, 16 minutes.

"That is just awful, and it doesn't make sense," Dey said. "It hasn't been so long since three hours was considered adequate for a round. This is murder on spectators as well as on players who wish to play at a reasonable speed."

At the rate championship golf is going, three hours might soon be considered adequate to make the turn.

So when the USGA announces Wednesday that it is launching a comprehensive campaign to combat pace of play, there is reason for skepticism.

The campaign is geared toward the recreational game. It will study what causes slow play and attempt to find solutions aimed at the player and golf course management. That's a good start, because the problem with slow play in golf is not at the professional level. That distinction must be made.

There are exceptions to be sure — a lot of them. Kevin Na and his horrific pre-shot routine of intentional misses at The Players Championship last year. Keegan Bradley and his start-stop-start stride into the ball to play the shot. Guan Tianlang at the Masters. Ben Crane at any tournament.

Tournament golf should abide by the rules, which in this case is Rule 6-7 — play without undue delay. But championship golf is different from the recreational game. The greens are faster than most golf fans can imagine. The golf courses are bigger. Rare is the par 5 that can't be reached in two shots. It's still a game, but for tour players, it's also their (well paying) jobs.

That's not to suggest tour players don't have an obligation. They owe it to the sport to set a good example. One reason often cited for slow play is that regular golfers try to copy what they watch on TV. And what they see are ridiculous pre-shot routines, reading putts from every conceivable angle and endless study of the yardage book.

Even so, the influence of televised golf is overstated in at least one respect.

"If we did everything professionals do, there would be no ball marks on the greens," said Rand Jerris, the USGA's senior managing director of public services.

The USGA, along with the PGA Tour, has embarked on its most extensive study on pace of play. Not to poke fun, but this could take a while. It's not an easy fix because the time it takes to play golf in America has been sliding in the wrong direction for 60 years or more.

According to a National Golf Foundation study, slow play — defined as having to wait on the group in front more than a few times — was listed by 91 percent of golfers surveyed as taking away from their golf experience.

Among the areas the USGA is targeting in its campaign:

— Designing golf courses where the routing, length and placement of hazards would help move things along. This sounds like a great idea except that hardly anyone is building golf courses in America.

— Making the golf course easier (and quicker) to play by limiting the rough, widening the fairways, slowing the greens and providing more accessible hole locations.

— Encouraging golf courses to manage the intervals in tee times, such as adding a few more minutes between groups.

— Working on player behavior to remind them to be ready to play and to use the right set of tees.

The intentions are noble. But any time words like "campaign" and "education" and "initiative" are involved, it's fair to wonder if brainstorming will lead to real results.

For its part, the U.S. Open is making a few changes this year. The starting time Thursday and Friday morning at Merion has been moved up 15 minutes to 6:45 a.m., meaning there will be (or should be) a gap of 5 hours, 48 minutes from when the last morning group tees off and the first afternoon group tees off on the first hole. Tee times on the weekend will be 11 minutes apart instead of 10 minutes. Every second helps.

But it comes back to a question from 1950 at Merion that so far has no answer.

Why is it no longer reasonable for a three-hour round? As the modern player gets better, the courses have become harder to provide a stronger test. But that would suggest the U.S. Open was not as hard as it is now. Olympic Club in 1955 and Winged Foot in 1974, to name two examples, would suggest otherwise.

And as much as the USGA is trying to find a solution, it surrendered to slow play 11 years ago at Bethpage Black. After 101 years of everyone starting the round at No. 1, the U.S. Open went to a two-tee start. Officials talk about having more daylight by sending players off the front and nine back nine, and the flexibility in case of bad weather. But this would not have been necessary if golf had not slowed to a crawl.

If this new initiative on pace of play doesn't provide any answers, perhaps the words of the great Julius Boros should be considered:

"By the time you get to your ball, if you don't know what to do with it, try another sport."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Cleveland 61 4th Qtr
Indiana 74
Washington 61 4th Qtr 11:12
Philadelphia 65
Golden State 54 3rd Qtr
Toronto 31
New York 41 3rd Qtr 12:00
Detroit 53
Orlando 45 3rd Qtr 10:54
Atlanta 47
Charlotte 59 3rd Qtr 7:36
Boston 50
LA Clippers 29 2nd Qtr 6:03
Memphis 32
Brooklyn 46 2nd Qtr 5:39
Houston 43
Miami 42 2nd Qtr 4:54
New Orleans 39
Minnesota 37 2nd Qtr 5:03
Chicago 36
Utah 8:00 PM
Denver
San Antonio 9:00 PM
Sacramento
Milwaukee 9:30 PM
LA Lakers
Oklahoma City 9:30 PM
Portland
Boston 2 3rd Prd 14:54
New Jersey 0
Calgary 0 3rd Prd 18:29
NY Islanders 1
Washington 0 3rd Prd
Carolina 2
Chicago 0 2nd Prd 7:52
Tampa Bay 1
Colorado 0 1st Prd 7:43
Dallas 0
Los Angeles 9:00 PM
Anaheim
Siena 63 FINAL
Quinnipiac 73
Harvard 49 FINAL
Cornell 57
Penn 69 2nd Half 0:31
Brown 73
Fairfield 55 2nd Half 1:27
Canisius 62
Manhattan 59 2nd Half 3:11
Iona 67
Saint Peters 52 2nd Half 3:51
Marist 59
Princeton 60 2nd Half 1:12
Yale 76
Ohio 23 2nd Half
Akron 27
Dartmouth 35 1st Half 1:40
Columbia 34
Valparaiso 9:00 PM
Cleveland State
Louisiana Tech 75 FINAL
Texas-El Paso 88
Seton Hall 77 FINAL
Xavier 60
Cornell 52 2nd Half 0:22
Harvard 56
Yale 49 FINAL
(14) Princeton 67
Elon 51 FINAL
Drexel 54
Northeastern 47 2nd Half 1:00
James Madison 82
St Johns 60 FINAL
Butler 49
Creighton 71 FINAL
Georgetown 62
Brown 58 FINAL
Penn 75
Columbia 48 2nd Half 0:48
Dartmouth 59
Canisius 54 FINAL
Siena 58
St Josephs Brooklyn 35 2nd Half 1:27
NJIT 76
Western Carolina 67 2nd Half 4:23
UNC Greensboro 66
Colorado 28 2nd Half
Arizona 28
Southern Ill 38 1st Half 2:26
Bradley 37
Drake 27 2nd Half
Wichita State 39
Indiana State 32 2nd Half
Evansville 21
Illinois State 29 2nd Half
Loyola-Chicago 33
Northern Iowa 34 2nd Half
Missouri State 35
Utah 15 1st Half 9:38
(10) Arizona State 10
Providence 19 1st Half 7:05
Villanova 24
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close