Sandusky defense about to put on witnesses, possibly including testimony by defendant himself

  • Article by: MARK SCOLFORO , Associated Press
  • Updated: June 18, 2012 - 5:42 AM

Jerry Sandusky

Photo: Nabil K. Mark, Mct

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

BELLEFONTE, Pa. - The defense in Jerry Sandusky's child sexual abuse trial could begin putting on its own witnesses early this week, and one of them could be the former Penn State assistant football coach himself.

Sandusky's lawyer suggested in opening statements that Sandusky, 68, may take the stand, although that is a risk that defense attorneys usually avoid.

It can be difficult for any defendant to hold up under the questions of a skilled cross-examiner, said David A. Harris, a University of Pittsburgh law professor.

"If they put him on, that's really a sign that they think they cannot succeed unless they put him on," Harris said. "Because it's a huge risk."

Jurors have already heard Sandusky deny the allegations, in the form of an audio recording of a stilted television interview Sandusky conducted shortly after his November arrest.

They also listened to 20 prosecution witnesses over four days, including eight men ages 18 to 28 years who said they were his victims when they were children.

In a large and crowded courtroom, with a crush of national media listening to their every word, the accusers recounted in detail their experiences. Their testimony forms the heart of the case the government is trying to prove, that Sandusky is a predatory pedophile, in the words of lead prosecutor Joe McGettigan.

The men said he plied them as children with gifts, dazzled them with the prestige of Penn State's vaunted football program and then scaled up physical contact from a hand on the knee or a fatherly kiss to fondling, repeated oral sex and in some cases violent anal rape.

Now they will hear the defendant's side and witnesses could begin testifying as early as Monday. Defense attorney Joseph Amendola's opening statement, court documents and four days of witness cross-examination provide something of a road map to a strategy aimed at creating enough doubt in jurors' minds to avoid a conviction that could send Sandusky to prison for life.

The defense has sought to show how the stories of accusers have changed over time, that they were prodded and coached by investigators and prosecutors, that some are motivated to lie by the hopes of a civil lawsuit jackpot, and to paint Sandusky's interactions with children as misunderstood and part of a lifelong effort to help them, not victimize them.

"Jerry, in my opinion, loves kids so much that he does things none of us would ever do," Amendola said at the start of the trial.

Lawyers pursuing a credibility defense try to give jurors reasons to disbelieve the narrative presented by prosecutors, and a financial gain motive or a changing story can be part of that, said Harris, the Pitt law professor.

"This is all standard procedure for building a reasonable doubt defense," said Harris, who has worked as a defense lawyer and prosecutor. "What they don't have here is any way to say, `OK, these kids have been molested, but somebody else did it.'"

The first four days of testimony, however, may have already cast the die, if jurors have made up their minds about the credibility of the eight accusers, six without a father in their lives, three who have never known their fathers. That doesn't mean they can't be swayed by defense evidence, and the judge will caution them to keep an open mind, Harris said.

"But what we're talking about is human nature here, and people have heard a lot already," he said.

In a recent court filing, Sandusky's lawyers have asked the judge to allow them to put before jurors the out-of-court statements made by the former Penn State president Graham Spanier and Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, two university administrators who are fighting criminal charges they lied to the Sandusky grand jury and did not properly report suspected child abuse. If permitted, that could help Sandusky undercut the credibility of a witness who says he saw Sandusky sexually abusing a yet-unidentified boy in a team shower more than a decade ago. The judge has not ruled on the request.

The defense also wants Judge John Cleland to allow into evidence the entire contents of "Touched," Sandusky's autobiography, saying in a court motion that the entire book would "contextualize the quotes and avoid misleading characterizations," although so far prosecutors have used the book as a source of photos, not quotes.

On Friday, they won an effort to argue that letters and other alleged grooming by Sandusky were not an attempt to manipulate the boys so that he could molest them, but rather evidence of "histrionic personality disorder" on Sandusky's part.

During cross-examination, Amendola pressed the accusers for dates and locations, details of their involvement with the kids' charity Sandusky founded, arrests or drug problems, contacts they have had with Sandusky in the years since the alleged abuse ended and the terms of representation deals with civil lawyers. At least six said they told incorrect or incomplete stories in early contacts with police, and three testified that some of the details only came back to them in recent years.

In some cases, the witnesses said they were embarrassed or did not want to get dragged into the case, while others spoke of recent improvements in what they recall.

He questioned so-called Victim 1, whose case began the wider investigation, about whether he had ever told a neighbor he and his mother would get rich from a civil suit.

"No, I have dreamed about living in a big house, I have dreamed about driving nice cars," Victim 1 testified. "Doesn't everybody?"

The young man described as Victim 7 said his memory of the allegations has improved since he began counseling a year ago.

"Through counseling and through talking about different events and through talking about things in my past, different things have triggered different memories and I had different things come back," he testified. "It's changed a lot about what I can remember today and what I could remember before, because I had everything negative blocked out."

Jurors appear to be paying very close attention to the trial, which in its first week moved along more quickly than many observers have predicted, leaving the prosecution close to wrapping up its case in chief, something that could happen as early as Monday.

During jury selection Sandusky's lawyers asked potential jurors about ties to a list of people who might be witnesses, including members of coach Joe Paterno's family and Dottie Sandusky. It is unclear, however, which of them will take the stand.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Detroit 55 4th Qtr
Philadelphia 68
Portland 74 4th Qtr
Cleveland 79
Sacramento 54 3rd Qtr
Toronto 54
Boston 33 2nd Qtr 6:25
Minnesota 40
Dallas 29 2nd Qtr 9:02
Houston 33
Denver 36 2nd Qtr 8:04
New Orleans 23
Brooklyn 39 2nd Qtr 8:32
Atlanta 37
Oklahoma City 27 2nd Qtr 8:18
New York 24
Charlotte 6 1st Qtr 8:31
San Antonio 7
LA Clippers 8:00 PM
Washington 9:30 PM
Toronto 0 2nd Prd 13:22
New Jersey 0
Pittsburgh 0 1st Prd 2:23
Washington 1
Chicago 9:30 PM
Los Angeles
Temple 77 2nd Half 3:45
UCF 47
Winthrop 62 2nd Half 3:39
Coastal Carolina 61
Lafayette 55 2nd Half 0:10
Colgate 52
Northeastern 45 2nd Half 1:40
Drexel 51
Wake Forest 53 2nd Half 7:49
Florida State 52
Rhode Island 49 2nd Half 8:03
Fordham 50
Delaware 77 2nd Half 0:34
James Madison 80
South Carolina 56 2nd Half 3:55
LSU 52
New Hampshire 51 2nd Half 3:56
Maine 39
Seton Hall 71 2nd Half 4:20
Marquette 57
Binghamton 58 2nd Half 3:04
American Univ 48 2nd Half 1:41
Navy 62
Elon 53 2nd Half 6:07
UNC-Wilmington 79
Wright State 52 2nd Half 4:04
Oakland 50
Minnesota 52 2nd Half 3:38
Penn State 56
Duquesne 48 2nd Half 4:50
Richmond 74
SMU 56 2nd Half 3:28
South Florida 49
Hartford 49 2nd Half 5:57
Stony Brook 55
Albany 43 2nd Half 1:00
Vermont 39
Hofstra 65 2nd Half 5:%2
William & Mary 79
UNC-Asheville 63 2nd Half 6:53
Longwood 49
Radford 45 2nd Half
Char Southern 35
Holy Cross 0 Postponed
Loyola-Maryland 0
Duke 54 2nd Half 15:01
Notre Dame 51
Texas Tech 17 2nd Half 14:52
Oklahoma 53
Oregon State 20 1st Half 1:48
Arizona State 38
Morehead State 29 1st Half 1:38
Austin Peay 33
Drake 38 1st Half 2:13
Bradley 26
Lehigh 22 1st Half 3:56
Bucknell 15
Rice 17 1st Half 1:30
Houston 20
Missouri State 19 1st Half 3:10
Illinois State 22
Loyola-Chicago 16 1st Half 4:30
Wichita State 19
Nebraska Omaha 28 1st Half 4:11
South Dakota St 33
Northern Iowa 21 1st Half 1:41
Southern Ill 24
Louisville 8:00 PM
Boston College
St Johns 8:00 PM
East Carolina 8:00 PM
Georgia Tech 8:00 PM
Miss State 8:00 PM
Ole Miss
Clemson 8:00 PM
NC State
Indiana 8:00 PM
Kansas 8:00 PM
Oregon 9:00 PM
Air Force 9:00 PM
San Jose St
Stanford 10:00 PM
Rider 56 FINAL
Siena 49
Dayton 76 FINAL
Richmond 62
Eastern Kentucky 53 FINAL
Jacksonville St 73
Saint Josephs 0 Postponed
Saint Louis 0
Bucknell 61 FINAL
Lehigh 76
Indiana 57 FINAL
Michigan State 72
Fordham 66 FINAL
Davidson 45
UMBC 61 2nd Half 5:15
Binghamton 48
Akron 53 2nd Half 5:19
Ohio U 60
Ball State 71 2nd Half 3:25
Miami-Ohio 51
Memphis 54 2nd Half 0:56
Cincinnati 44
East Carolina 27 2nd Half 6:51
(2) Connecticut 71
Murray State 57 2nd Half 0:48
Eastern Illinois 73
Kent State 62 2nd Half 0:01
Central Michigan 65
UT Martin 64 2nd Half 1:05
Tennessee St 56
Eastern Michigan 50 2nd Half 4:05
Western Mich 79
Colgate 56 2nd Half 0:08
Lafayette 58
Duquesne 74 2nd Half 1:00
St Bonaventure 61
George Mason 49 2nd Half 5:57
VA Commonwealth 58
Detroit 55 2nd Half 0:49
Youngstown St 53
Army 0 Postponed
Boston U 0
Loyola-Maryland 0 Postponed
Holy Cross 0
SMU 29 1st Half 1:58
Tulsa 28
Oklahoma St 15 1st Half 3:58
Kansas State 18
West Virginia 23 1st Half 2:01
Texas Tech 27
Denver 37 1st Half 3:15
South Dakota 35
Northwestern St 21 1st Half 0:34
Central Arkansas 26
Austin Peay 28 1st Half 1:18
SIU-Edwardsville 44
Kansas 18 1st Half 4:08
Iowa State 17
Bowling Green 12 1st Half 4:27
Northern Ill 27
Penn State 27 1st Half 3:46
Minnesota 27
San Jose St 8:00 PM
Air Force
Boise State 8:00 PM
Colorado State
Utah State 8:00 PM
San Diego State 9:00 PM
Fresno State
Nevada 9:00 PM
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters




question of the day

Poll: Do you favor the plan for expanded athletic facilities at the U of M?

Weekly Question