Auditor: Running Aces Harness Park underpaid purses by $436,865

  • Article by: RACHEL BLOUNT , Star Tribune
  • Updated: July 9, 2014 - 12:58 AM

Running Aces Harness Track in Columbus, Minn.

Photo: David Brewster, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The Minnesota legislative auditor has found that Running Aces Harness Park did not comply with state law regulating the amount of money it put into its purse fund from 2008 through 2012, estimating that it underpaid horsemen racing at the Columbus harness track by $436,865.

In a report issued Tuesday, the auditor also found that the Minnesota Racing Commission did not adequately oversee purse payments at Running Aces. The report recommends that the track make a “reasonable payment’’ to make up for the shortfall, that the racing commission improve its oversight and that state law governing the payments be clarified.

Running Aces issued a statement saying it put an additional $100,000 into the purse fund in February. Its response to the report asserts that other payments it made to horsemen should offset the shortage. The racing commission said it will begin weekly reviews of purse allotments at Running Aces and Canterbury Park, ask the legislature to clarify laws regulating purses and begin negotiations with Running Aces regarding the underpayments.

The state auditor’s review came at the request of the racing commission, which has been locked in a 13-month dispute with Running Aces over its purses. Some commission members believed the law requires that tracks contribute 8.4 percent of the handle to the purse fund, which is how Canterbury Park calculates its payments. From 2008 through 2012, Running Aces contributed 8.4 percent of the takeout, which is the amount the track deducts from the handle before paying winning wagers.

Running Aces adjusted its formula in 2013 and began paying 8.4 percent of its handle to purses. But the racing commission, Running Aces and harness horsemen could not agree on what, if anything, the track should pay to settle the shortfall from the previous five years. The auditor’s report concluded that the payments should have been calculated on the handle, which would have given $436,865 more to purses.

State Rep. Joe Atkins (D-Inver Grove Heights) said Tuesday that the House Commerce Committee will discuss the audit at a hearing later in July. “I and other members of the committee from both sides of the aisle have been raising serious questions about Running Aces’ operations for some time,’’ Atkins said in a statement. “We will discuss steps to prevent this from happening again and to ensure there is absolute integrity and honesty in Minnesota racing.’’

Tom DiPasquale, executive director of the racing commission, said he has scheduled a meeting with Running Aces’ board of directors later this month to discuss the track’s response to the report. While he hopes a settlement can be negotiated quickly, he said he was “a little disappointed’’ that Running Aces continues to maintain it does not owe any back payments.

“I don’t see much difference in that position from what they had taken before the auditor’s report, which was that certain aggregate offsets made up the difference,’’ said DiPasquale, who was appointed as executive director in November. “I read the auditor’s report as concluding differently from that.

“We’ll see where it goes from here, but we don’t intend to drag this on. At some point, the commission has to exercise its authority.’’



Rachel Blount • 612-673-4389


  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Baltimore 2 FINAL
Detroit 15
NY Yankees 5 FINAL
Philadelphia 5
Northeastern 1 FINAL
Boston 2
Miami-Fla 1 FINAL
Miami 7
Pittsburgh 8 FINAL
Toronto 7
San Francisco 4 FINAL
Oakland 9
Cleveland 0 FINAL
Cincinnati 10
Boston College 0 FINAL
Boston 1
Arizona State 0 FINAL
Arizona 4
Boston 79 FINAL
Cleveland 110
LA Lakers 103 FINAL
Charlotte 104
Sacramento 124 FINAL
New York 86
Houston 96 FINAL
Atlanta 104
Utah 93 FINAL
Memphis 82
Washington 92 FINAL
Chicago 97
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
Denver 106
Nashville 1 FINAL
New Jersey 3
Calgary 3 FINAL(OT)
Philadelphia 2
Washington 5 FINAL
Columbus 3
Buffalo 0 FINAL
Tampa Bay 3
Toronto 3 FINAL
Florida 2
Ottawa 2 FINAL(SO)
Minnesota 3
NY Islanders 2 FINAL(OT)
Dallas 3
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Arizona 1
Los Angeles 5 FINAL
Edmonton 2
San Jose 6 FINAL
Vancouver 2
Ole Miss 82 FINAL
Alabama 74
Eastern Mich 67 FINAL
Ball State 60
Kent State 81 FINAL
Bowling Green 80
Ohio 66 FINAL
Buffalo 93
Georgetown 60 FINAL
Butler 54
Toledo 77 FINAL
Central Mich 85
Rhode Island 59 FINAL
Dayton 75
Youngstown St 67 FINAL
Detroit 77
North Carolina 81 FINAL
Georgia Tech 49
Loyola-Maryland 45 FINAL
Holy Cross 62
Iowa 77 FINAL
Indiana 63
Akron 63 FINAL
Miami-Ohio 70
Army 52 FINAL
Navy 56
Maryland 60 FINAL
Rutgers 50
Kennesaw St 54 FINAL
USC Upstate 90
Jacksonville 63 FINAL
Fla Gulf Coast 81
Lipscomb 76 FINAL
Northern Ky 73
Stetson 67 FINAL
North Florida 81
Wright State 57 FINAL
Ill-Chicago 60
Western Mich 63 FINAL
Northern Ill 65
Nebraska Omaha 80 FINAL
North Dakota 78
Houston Baptist 71 FINAL
Abilene Christian 83
NC State 66 FINAL
Clemson 61
Texas A&M 62 FINAL
Florida 66
Kentucky 72 FINAL
Georgia 64
West Virginia 69 FINAL
Kansas 76
Auburn 61 FINAL
Missouri 63
Michigan 78 FINAL
Northwestern 82
Villanova 76 FINAL
Creighton 72
Longwood 55 FINAL
Gardner-Webb 63
Charleston Southern 39 FINAL
Presbyterian 47
Coastal Carolina 54 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 68
UMass Lowell 60
West Virginia 55 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Texas 79
Fresno State 61 FINAL
Air Force 41
San Jose St 76 FINAL
Boise State 91
Nevada 61 FINAL
Colorado State 68
San Diego State 76
Wyoming 61 FINAL
Utah State 57


question of the day

Poll: How will the Wild finish out the season?

Weekly Question





Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters