For Vikings, now it counts

  • Article by: CHIP SCOGGINS , Star Tribune
  • Updated: September 2, 2013 - 12:47 PM

As we turn the page on the preseason (thankfully), we’ll finally have a chance to gain some clarity on the Vikings’ various unknowns.

Whew, thankfully that’s over, so now we can move on to football games that actually matter.

It’s safe to put away the NoDoz that came in handy during preseason games. No more evaluation of backups and long shots who might never wear an NFL uniform again.

As we turn the page on the calendar and send the kids back to school, we’re reminded that summer is over and so is the tedious analysis of training camp position battles.

In other words, it’s time for Adrian Peterson to get back to work in his quest to rush for a million yards in a single season.

The Vikings reconvene at Winter Park on Monday to being preparation for Sunday’s season opener in Detroit. Their 1-3 preseason record is meaningless as an indicator of future performance, but it’s fair to ask what, if anything, can be gleaned from those exhibitions.

In truth, it’s difficult to say, at least offensively, because Peterson played only two snaps in the preseason and didn’t touch the ball once. A passing game that benefits from the attention Peterson receives never really clicked, which did nothing to allay concerns about Christian Ponder’s development.

Ponder played only 73 snaps in three preseason games, according to ProFootballFocus. That small sample size made it impossible to gauge Ponder’s chemistry with his new targets, Greg Jennings and Cordarrelle Patterson.

Even their supposed dress rehearsal against San Francisco in the third game didn’t present a true picture because the team removed Peterson after only two plays. Sunday’s opener will provide the first true glimpse of how their offense can function.

The Vikings enter the season with a few other unknowns. Will veteran defensive tackle Kevin Williams be ready for the opener after suffering a knee injury on a cheap shot against San Francisco? How will the three-game suspension of Pro Bowl fullback Jerome Felton affect Peterson and the running game? Can the young cornerbacks perform sufficiently in a pass-happy league?

The good news is that the Vikings return 19 of 22 position starters from a team that won 10 games and earned a playoff berth. This isn’t a team filled with new faces.

The 53-man roster announced on Saturday included 12 players who weren’t on the 2012 final roster, a relatively low number compared with other seasons. The group of newcomers includes eight rookies, seven of them draft picks.

The Vikings continued to tweak their roster Sunday by claiming former Chicago Bears tackle J’Marcus Webb off waivers to serve as a backup to Matt Kalil and Phil Loadholt. The team released Troy Kropog to make room for Webb and also signed seven players to the practice squad.

General Manager Rick Spielman formulated a plan after a tumultuous 2010 season to build a youthful roster and turn the draft into an organizational bedrock. Of the 53 players on the active roster, 15 were selected in the two most recent drafts.

The Vikings have overseen so much roster turnover in recent years that team should have required players to wear name tags. To fully appreciate their extreme makeover in a league known for its fluidity, just go back to the end of the 2010 season.

The Vikings began that ensuing offseason with 69 players in the organization. Only 18 are still with the team.

They had nine wide receivers; none of them remain. Only three of the 11 offensive linemen and three of the 14 defensive backs still call Winter Park home.

In this case, change was necessary, and all the maneuvering injected the roster with some promising young talent that helped the Vikings orchestrate the largest single-season turnaround in team history in 2012.

And now for the encore.

The best part of preseason is its conclusion. Rather than speculate about Ponder, his new wide receivers or the team’s young cornerbacks, we’ll finally gain some clarity this week.

 

Chip Scoggins • ascoggins@startribune.com

 

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Toronto 104 FINAL
Indiana 91
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Detroit 95
Milwaukee 109 FINAL
Miami 102
Memphis 109 FINAL
Dallas 90
Chicago 113 FINAL
Golden State 111
Washington 98 FINAL
LA Lakers 92
NY Rangers 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 4
Arizona 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Washington 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Carolina 4
Dallas 2 FINAL
Montreal 3
Detroit 5 FINAL
Florida 4
Colorado 3 FINAL(OT)
Nashville 4
Buffalo 1 FINAL
Calgary 4
Minnesota 2 FINAL
Edmonton 1
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Ball State 47 FINAL
Akron 59
Northern Ill 46 FINAL
Bowling Green 56
Western Mich 71 FINAL
Buffalo 77
Ohio 40 FINAL
Eastern Mich 76
Xavier 66 FINAL
Georgetown 53
Vanderbilt 62 FINAL
Georgia 70
West Virginia 65 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Central Mich 53 FINAL
Kent State 63
Saint Josephs 48 FINAL
La Salle 53
Nebraska 44 FINAL
Michigan 58
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Toledo 70
Tulsa 62 FINAL
Tulane 55
George Washington 48 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 72
Pittsburgh 67 FINAL
Virginia Tech 70
Indiana State 78 FINAL
Evansville 89
Tabor College 53 FINAL
Oral Roberts 94
Florida 52 FINAL
Alabama 50
Tennessee 64 FINAL
Arkansas 69
Texas A&M 71 FINAL
Auburn 61
Baylor 53 FINAL
Oklahoma State 64
DePaul 0 Postponed
Providence 0
Michigan State 0 Postponed
Rutgers 0
Wyoming 44 FINAL
Utah State 56
Fresno State 47 FINAL
San Diego St 58
UNLV 67 FINAL
Nevada 62
SD Christian 54 FINAL
CS-Bakersfield 79
Colorado State 78 FINAL
Boise State 82
Temple 71 FINAL
UCF 54
Campbell 42 FINAL
Presbyterian 51
Coastal Carolina 65 FINAL
High Point 73
Gardner-Webb 49 FINAL
Radford 59
UNC-Asheville 58 FINAL
Liberty 62
Winthrop 63 FINAL
Longwood 62
Columbia International 33 FINAL
Charleston Southern 74
Tulane 63 FINAL
Houston 46
(3) Baylor 89 FINAL
TCU 67
Navy 49 FINAL
American Univ 59
Valparaiso 42 FINAL
Illinois-Chicago 60

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: What chance does the Wild have of making the playoffs?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close