Fiesta foes' look far apart

  • Article by: KELLIS ROBINETT , The Wichita Eagle
  • Updated: December 25, 2012 - 8:39 PM

Kansas State and Oregon could not be any more different in their approach to uniform styles.

MANHATTAN, KAN.

Kansas State and Oregon both wear Nike's signature swoosh on their football uniforms, but that's where the comparisons ends.

They are on opposite ends of the fashion spectrum.

Under Bill Snyder, the Wildcats have worn the same uniforms -- silver pants, silver helmets featuring purple and white stripes, and solid white or purple jerseys -- without any major modifications since he redesigned them in 1989. He wanted a look that resembled the Dallas Cowboys, and still does.

"We thought we got it right the first time," Snyder said. "We saw no reason to change them."

The Ducks take a different approach. They change their uniforms -- loud, flashy and trendsetting -- every week. Sometimes they wear neon yellow numbers. Sometimes their shoulders feature designs such as wings or spikes. They occasionally wear yellow and green. Other times they wear all black, white or a little gray. They have more than 500 combinations to choose from, and pride themselves on never wearing the same uniform twice.

Oregon hasn't unveiled the full uniform it will wear against K-State at the Fiesta Bowl on Jan. 3, but bowl representatives have released photos that indicate the numbers will change colors as you look at them from different angles. When the full outfit is released, it is sure to be a popular topic on social media.

It always is.

Ever since Nike founder and Oregon grad Phil Knight began supplying the athletic department with state-of-the-art apparel, it's what the Ducks have been best known for. Coincidentally or not, they started winning at the same time they began wearing glitzy uniforms. They gave Oregon a recruiting boost, and the Ducks are now a regular Pac-12 championship contender on their way to a fourth consecutive BCS bowl.

Oregon's rise coincided with its fashion notoriety so well that other programs have copied it.

Oklahoma State now changes its uniforms so often that some have called the Cowboys "the Oregon of the Big 12." Baylor and Maryland mix up their uniforms all the time. Most schools that wear Nike, such as Michigan, Boise State and Missouri, have at least one alternate -- or "Pro Combat" -- uniform they wear for special games. Adidas-wearing schools such as Nebraska, Wisconsin and Notre Dame do, also. Even teams wearing Under Armour are changing uniforms.

K-State receiver Chris Harper, who transferred from Oregon, has been on both ends of the spectrum. He has worn flashy uniforms and K-State's classic look. He sees advantages to both but doesn't understand why so many schools are copying the Ducks.

"That's kind of lame to me," Harper said. "Oregon started that thing. Let them have their thing. Let them be who they are. Every school [is] trying to jump on the bandwagon with different jerseys, too. The thing is nobody can do what Oregon is doing because they have Phil Knight. You don't have Phil Knight.

"Just be who you are. That's one thing I like about being out here. We know who we are. You don't see us jumping out with any 'Pro Combats' or new gloves or stuff all the time. We do what we do. We play in games. It's not about the jerseys, it's about who plays on the field."

There is certainly something to be said for a consistent look. Not all new uniforms are good. Maryland and Michigan both received negative reactions for wearing obnoxiously loud jerseys. That's something Texas, Oklahoma and Penn State don't have to worry about. They are well-known for wearing the same uniforms every time they take the field. Their helmets and jerseys are iconic.

Still, some K-State players would prefer something new.

"I do like the old-school look that Coach Snyder brings, but it is becoming a new game," sophomore center B.J. Finney said. "Some guys would like to see some new uniforms."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Atlanta - WP: E. Stults 4 FINAL
Detroit - LP: J. Chamberlain 2
Washington - LP: X. Cedeno 2 FINAL
St. Louis - WP: M. Wacha 6
Philadelphia 4 FINAL
Pittsburgh 18
Baltimore 6 FINAL
Tampa Bay 6
Miami - LP: D. Haren 1 FINAL
NY Mets - WP: R. Montero 7
San Diego 6 FINAL
Cincinnati 3
San Francisco 5 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 8
Colorado 2 FINAL
Oakland 11
LA Angels - LP: N. Tropeano 3 FINAL
Seattle - WP: T. Walker 5
Cleveland 4 FINAL
Chicago WSox 1
Kansas City 11 FINAL
Texas 7
Los Angeles 4 FINAL
Arizona 2
Toronto 7 FINAL
Houston 4
Minnesota - LP: C. Johnson 2 FINAL
Boston - WP: J. Masterson 14
Boston 116 FINAL
Charlotte 104
LA Lakers 113 FINAL
Philadelphia 111
Houston 96 FINAL
Toronto 99
Milwaukee 88 FINAL
Atlanta 101
Sacramento 83 FINAL
Memphis 97
Utah 104 FINAL
Minnesota 84
Phoenix 86 FINAL
Portland 109
Tampa Bay 5 FINAL
Montreal 3
Vancouver 4 FINAL
St. Louis 1
Calgary 5 FINAL
Dallas 3
Los Angeles 1 FINAL
Chicago 4
Edmonton 4 FINAL
Colorado 1
Buffalo 4 FINAL
Arizona 1
ULM 58 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 65
Dayton 70 FINAL
(1) Connecticut 91
(6) Tennessee 48 FINAL
(4) Maryland 58

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Who are you rooting for in the NCAA Final Four?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close