Michael Rand started RandBall with hopes that he could convince the world to love jumpsuits as much as he does. So far, he's only succeeded in using the word "redacted" a lot. He welcomes suggestions, news tips, links of pure genius, and pictures of pets in Halloween costumes here, though he already knows he will regret that last part.

Follow Randball on Twitter

Friday (The end of the pitch to contact era for the Twins) edition: Wha' Happened?

Posted by: Michael Rand under Professional baseball, Twins fans Updated: December 7, 2012 - 9:43 AM

 

There are two different versions, really of the somewhat infamous term "pitch to contact" when it comes to the Twins. The fans' version is that Minnesota stocks up on rag-arm hurlers who couldn't break a wet paper towel with their fastball and has them throw strikes at all costs in the hope that enough hard-hit balls will find gloves. The Twins' version -- and in reality the version employed or embraced by a lot of teams -- has held that, essentially, getting ahead in the count with quality (though not overpowering) pitches is critical for success, which ultimately comes when the batter (behind in the count) makes weak contact for easy outs. They were channeling Crash Davis:

 

Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring, and besides they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic.

There is some overlap in the two versions; there is also no doubt the philosophy has worked to a certain degree. When the Twins were winning six AL Central titles in a nine year span, they were often among the stingiest team in the majors when it came to allowing walks and never had a consistent strikeout pitcher for a long period of time outside of Johan Santana. Fans would complain that the philosophy worked well over a 162-game schedule, often against inferior division opponents, but fizzled in the postseason against better-hitting teams. The proof of that, of course, is in the fact that the Twins have lost their last 12 playoff games dating back to Game 2 of the 2004 ALDS. Nine of those losses came to the loaded Yankees. Still, six division titles are nothing to sneeze at.

In any event, we didn't come to praise Pitch to Contact. Instead, we came to bury it. Because it certainly appears the Twins are doing so. If the philosophy didn't die during the 2012 draft, when they loaded up on power arms, it has been finished off over the past week or so with the trades of Denard Span and Ben Revere.

In return, the Twins received two flame-throwing prospects -- Alex Meyer and Trevor May -- as well as a young major league starter in Vance Worley who, while he is not a classic overpowering pitcher, does have a career MLB strikeout rate of 7.7 per nine innings (yes, he has a high called strike rate, but a strike is a strike).

In other words, this is a major shift in thinking. Jim Souhan described it thusly today:

When Terry Ryan made the Twins one of baseball's most respected organizations in the early 2000s, he employed a formula, his own version of Moneyball.

He emphasized drafting athletic players with fielding range and pitchers who threw strikes, and making trades for underappreciated prospects in the lower minor leagues, while avoiding spending big money on the free-agent market.

In his second tenure as the Twins' general manager, Ryan is following a similar plan with a significant twist: He's looking for power pitchers via all avenues.

''We want the kind of pitchers we haven't had enough of," Twins assistant general manager Rob Antony said. "Pitchers who can miss bats."

That's the money quote -- an acknowledgment that not only has there been a shift in thinking, but that relying too heavily on a pitch-to-contact staff is flawed. The Twins will surely look to harness these young throwers who are now in their system and work to bring their walk rates down. But it sounds like they won't mind seeing a few more strikeouts and overpowering stuff going forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

Baltimore 2 FINAL
Detroit 15
NY Yankees 5 FINAL
Philadelphia 5
Northeastern 1 FINAL
Boston 2
Miami-Fla 1 FINAL
Miami 7
Pittsburgh 8 FINAL
Toronto 7
San Francisco 4 FINAL
Oakland 9
Cleveland 0 FINAL
Cincinnati 10
Boston College 0 FINAL
Boston 1
Arizona State 0 FINAL
Arizona 4
Boston 79 FINAL
Cleveland 110
LA Lakers 103 FINAL
Charlotte 104
Sacramento 124 FINAL
New York 86
Houston 96 FINAL
Atlanta 104
Utah 93 FINAL
Memphis 82
Washington 92 FINAL
Chicago 97
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
Denver 106
Nashville 1 FINAL
New Jersey 3
Calgary 3 FINAL(OT)
Philadelphia 2
Washington 5 FINAL
Columbus 3
Buffalo 0 FINAL
Tampa Bay 3
Toronto 3 FINAL
Florida 2
Ottawa 2 FINAL(SO)
Minnesota 3
NY Islanders 2 FINAL(OT)
Dallas 3
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Arizona 1
Los Angeles 5 FINAL
Edmonton 2
San Jose 6 FINAL
Vancouver 2
Ole Miss 82 FINAL
Alabama 74
Eastern Mich 67 FINAL
Ball State 60
Kent State 81 FINAL
Bowling Green 80
Ohio 66 FINAL
Buffalo 93
Georgetown 60 FINAL
Butler 54
Toledo 77 FINAL
Central Mich 85
Rhode Island 59 FINAL
Dayton 75
Youngstown St 67 FINAL
Detroit 77
North Carolina 81 FINAL
Georgia Tech 49
Loyola-Maryland 45 FINAL
Holy Cross 62
Iowa 77 FINAL
Indiana 63
Akron 63 FINAL
Miami-Ohio 70
Army 52 FINAL
Navy 56
Maryland 60 FINAL
Rutgers 50
Kennesaw St 54 FINAL
USC Upstate 90
Jacksonville 63 FINAL
Fla Gulf Coast 81
Lipscomb 76 FINAL
Northern Ky 73
Stetson 67 FINAL
North Florida 81
Wright State 57 FINAL
Ill-Chicago 60
Western Mich 63 FINAL
Northern Ill 65
Nebraska Omaha 80 FINAL
North Dakota 78
Houston Baptist 71 FINAL
Abilene Christian 83
NC State 66 FINAL
Clemson 61
Texas A&M 62 FINAL
Florida 66
Kentucky 72 FINAL
Georgia 64
West Virginia 69 FINAL
Kansas 76
Auburn 61 FINAL
Missouri 63
Michigan 78 FINAL
Northwestern 82
Villanova 76 FINAL
Creighton 72
Longwood 55 FINAL
Gardner-Webb 63
Charleston Southern 39 FINAL
Presbyterian 47
Coastal Carolina 54 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 68
NJIT 51 FINAL
UMass Lowell 60
West Virginia 55 FINAL
Kansas State 59
TCU 45 FINAL
Texas 79
Fresno State 61 FINAL
Air Force 41
San Jose St 76 FINAL
Boise State 91
Nevada 61 FINAL
Colorado State 68
UNLV 61 FINAL
San Diego State 76
Wyoming 61 FINAL
Utah State 57

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How will the Wild finish out the season?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT