Minimal sole, but maximum results for runners

  • Article by: KENT YOUNGBLOOD , Star Tribune
  • Updated: June 14, 2012 - 6:10 AM

  Runners who swear by minimalist shoes say the design has altered their style for the better.

hide

Shelly Noland is a proponent of the new barefoot-style of running. She wears Vibrams, which mimic running barefoot while protecting the soles of the feet.

Photo: Renee Jones Schneider, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Shelly Noland's running shoes fit her like a glove.

Literally.

On Saturday, Noland will run her 14th marathon, her third Grandma's and her ninth wearing Vibram FiveFingers, minimalist shoes that cover the foot like a five-toed sock, offering protection against the occasional pebble or shard of glass, but no extra cushioning.

This is by design. There is a growing group that believes running barefoot -- or something close to it is best, advocating a running style that's easier on the body.

Noland is a true believer. And, like most converts, she admits to being prone to proselytize.

"I've gotten some of my friends wearing them," she said. "Or at least give them a try. And I get asked about them every place I go."

There are those who run completely barefoot, like the members of the local chapter of the Barefoot Runners Society. Others, such as Noland, prefer the minimalist approach, using one of many makes and models with the same concept. And while it might sound counterintuitive, true believers will tell you that running this way is good for you.

It encourages a runner to run more on the naturally cushioned balls of their feet, they say, while traditional shoes -- heavily reinforced and padded -- can result in a style where the runner lands heel first. The gospel here is Christopher McDougall's 2009 best-seller "Born to Run," in which he got to know members of the Tarahumara Indian Tribe in Mexico, whose members are known to run very long distances at an uncommon speed.

It was while reading that book that Noland decided to change the way she ran.

Changing styles

Noland, 34 and a Blaine resident, had reached a plateau in her running, dealing with constant knee and knee- related pain. Over a six-week period she re-learned how to run.

"Before, I was a heel-striker," she said. "That's why I was getting injured so much. It corrected my form. And it gave me a new appreciation for running, too. At the time I was in such a lull with running. It gave me new inspiration, something fun to try. It was a good little experiment for me."

She isn't alone. Running in minimalist shoes is not yet in the mainstream, but it's growing. Sales of the FiveFingers, for instance, grew from about $450,000 in 2006 to an estimated $50 million in 2011. According to a story in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, sales of barefoot-style shoes already has become a $1.7 billion industry.

According to Formula 4 Media, a publisher of trade magazines, that growth continues. A warm spring meant higher sales of running shoes this March compared to 2011. But the big gain was in minimalist shoes. Sales of such shoes more than doubled this March from a year ago, totaling $4 million.

For Noland, it is a night-and-day difference.

After taking time to transition to the new style, she said she has been injury- free, despite training 50 or 60 miles a week. And she says she is faster. Her best marathon time in traditional shoes was about 4 hours and 19 minutes. Since the switch her best time is 3:45.

But the style might not be for everybody.

Mechanical mess

Dr. James Gladstone is the co-chair of sports medicine at Mount Sinai's department of orthopedics in New York.

"I haven't quite figured out who it works for and who it doesn't," he said. "What people have to realize is that, when they're attempting to do it, to completely change their style of running they are changing the mechanics, too. The way the joints move, the way the foot hits the ground, how that force is distributed up into the knees and back. For some people it can be great. For others it can cause many problems."

Running barefoot puts more pressure on the calves, the Achilles' tendons and, in some cases, the hamstring and back.

"There is no research to show that you are less likely to get injured or that your performance will improve," said Dr. Paul Langer, a podiatrist at Twin Cities Orthopedics and an avid runner. "But when you run barefoot, or in minimalist shoes, you do change your movement pattern. For some people that can be beneficial."

For example, the knee might not work as hard, but the feet and ankles work harder. Langer has seen stress fractures in the feet or Achilles' tendon injuries.

Langer, who uses minimalist shoes to augment his own training, advises people to transition into the style slowly, much like Noland did.

"I look at it as a training tool," he said. "Some people can incorporate it into their training and it can rejuvenate their running."

Still a curiosity

And even if minimalist shoes aren't the end-all, the shoe industry has listened. Most manufacturers have introduced shoes that incorporate minimalist ideas.

"You're seeing shoes, across the board, become lighter and less tricked out," said Luke Rowe, vice president for business development for Fleet Feet, which has 95 stores throughout the country. "The minimalist discussion has been good for the overall trend in running shoes."

For Noland, it's more than a trend. It's a way of life. She has been able to train harder and more often. Which is why she's so eager to share her discovery. Still, she is in the minority. She sees a handful of like-minded folks at marathons. Her Vibrams are still a relative curiosity.

But, for her, they worked, giving her less pain and more appreciation for running.

"For me, it corrected a lot of things," Noland said. "I haven't been injured since. I run faster, closer to the ground. It feels more natural to me. ... They're not for everybody. But, for me, they've been successful. Now, when I put traditional shoes on, they feel like cement blocks."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How optimistic are you about the 2015 Twins?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close