Checking ban for peewee hockey has governing bodies at odds

Minnesota Hockey opposes a USA proposal to ban checking in peewees.


Jerad Giving went down after a check by Eric Maroney during Miracle Gold team checking practice at the Schwans Super Rink facility in Blaine.

Photo: David Brewster, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

USA Hockey, in the name of increased safety and skills development, has proposed checking be banned from peewee hockey. Its 92-member board will vote on the issue Saturday.

Who could be against progress in safety and skills?

Minnesota Hockey, that's who. In a close vote, it instructed its four representatives on the national board to vote against raising the age level for legalized checking from peewees (ages 11 and 12) to bantams (13 and 14).

Among Minnesota Hockey's concerns about banning peewee checking are:

• Girls would stay in boys' hockey two more years, hurting the overall development of the girls' game.

• Non-USA sanctioned programs will continue to check.

• There is insufficient time for players, coaches, officials and parents to adapt.

• Peewee coaches might not teach checking in practices, which would increase injuries among bantam players.

Minnesota Hockey, which governs youth and amateur hockey in the state, has more than 63,000 members; 48,000 are 14 and under. There were 6,100 peewees in Minnesota last season, 58,000 nationally.

Hal Tearse, who trains coaches for Minnesota Hockey, attended a national meeting in January during which the checking ban was discussed. He said there was not one negative comment from any members of the youth council, the safety committee or the coaches section.

That has changed.

Minnesota Hockey named its own committee to study the issue and last month, after getting those recommendations, its 27-member board voted. The nays prevailed by a one- or two-vote margin, several insiders said.

"It's an emotional issue for a lot of people," Tearse said. "[Opponents] think when their kids become bantams, they will get killed because they will get used to skating with their heads down.

"We've gotten e-mails from Canada that we will become a sissy, recreational league in Minnesota. Of the couple hundred e-mails we've received, 80 percent are against it."

But Tearse, also the boys' coach at Providence Academy, wants checking out of peewee hockey.

"We have too many kids getting hurt at that level," he said. "These kids are not ready for heavy body contact. They've got a lot of skills they need to be focused on, like skating, stick-handling and passing without being concerned about getting destroyed by one or two other kids."

Concussions increase

Dr. Michael Stuart, chief medical officer for USA Hockey and the co-director of the Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, also supports the checking ban for peewees.

"I personally love the physical part of the game of hockey," said Stuart, who has three sons who have played in the NHL. "[But] numerous studies document significant risks of injuries, including concussions, in leagues that allow body checking at the peewee level."

A year ago, the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article on 2,000-plus young Canadian players. It compared injuries to peewee boys in Alberta, where checking is permitted, with those in a league in Quebec, where checking is not. It found the players in Alberta suffered more than three times as many game-related injuries, including severe concussions.

"Younger players, if they don't have the skills or mental awareness to safely execute a legal body check, they lose control or have unanticipated hits or high-risk collisions," Stuart said. "Or sometimes boarding, charging or hits to the head are misconstrued as legal body checking."

USA Hockey's proposal encourages coaches to begin teaching checking in practices at squirts (ages 9 and 10) and to continue the instruction through peewees.

"Our research at Mayo shows dramatic decreased risk of injury in practice," Stuart said, "so that's the perfect time to introduce these skills because kids don't get hurt very often. When they get to bantams then, in theory at least, they understand how to check."

Shift in culture

Christian Koelling, who oversees USA Hockey's education of coaches in Minnesota, said a checking ban for peewees will return youth hockey to the way it used to be played before facemasks and improved equipment.

"Now you see more hits and a lot more hits with injury potential," said Koelling, the director of hockey operations for NCAA champion Minnesota Duluth. "Body contact at a young level should be 100 percent intended to gain possession of the puck. But there has been a shift in culture and young level checking is not always that. It is used as intimidation."

USA Hockey officials still expect the peewee checking ban to pass easily, despite Minnesota Hockey's opposition at te congress.

Brad Hewitt, director of District 6 in Minnesota Hockey, is one of the strongest opponents. The injury argument for it troubles him. He said his district, which covers the southwestern suburbs, and District 3, the western suburbs, have studied injuries for several years at the peewee level and there are more among girls, who don't check, than among boys. He also said that Canada, despite its injury studies, still has checking in its elite peewee leagues.

Hewitt said if USA Hockey wants to protect players, it should have tougher penalties on checking from behind, boarding and charging; Minnesota Hockey will make that same recommendation.

Marc Sorenson, a Wayzata bantam coach, wants peewees to keep checking, too.

"A big part of what they are talking about is discrepancies in size and strength [in peewees]," Sorenson said. "All they are doing is delaying the problem. We'd be much better served to put more holistic effort into proper technique, how to check. I know what a daunting task that is. The coaches' abilities and experience is all over the board."

In support of checking

One of the veterans is Rob Loftus, an Elk River High School assistant for 18 years. This spring, he is coaching Miracle Gold, a north metro peewee team. Checking drills were part of its 90-minute practice on Monday at the Super Rink in Blaine.

"There shouldn't be any change; kids should check at peewees," Loftus said. He said checking is ingrained in the state psyche.

Three dads with players on Loftus' team support his premise.

Jay Perbix, who played at Gustavus Adolphus, wants his son Nick to keep checking, saying, "Kids get bad habits if they know they are not going to get checked."

Nick's 10-year-old brother, Jack, already is checking as a squirt in summer tournaments not sanctioned by USA Hockey.

Jim Kroschel, whose son Kyle has joined Loftus' team for one tournament, said checking equalizes disparities for peewees and keeps more kids in the sport. "If you are not quite as fast, you can hold somebody up," he said.

Jim Kroschel had two daughters who played girls' soccer at Kyle's age and said that sport was much worse for injuries; "like hockey without any protection."

At 4-5 and 85 pounds, Jared Giving was the smallest Miracle Gold player on the ice at Monday's practice. He got crushed a few times when he started playing peewees, but he learned how to use his quickness and finesse, said his father, Tim.

"When you are smaller, you play a different style of game," said Tim Giving, who was undersized himself when he played for Augsburg. "[Jerad] doesn't mind checking. He will go in corners. He is not afraid."

Tim Giving said he could go either way on the peewee ban.

Then there are former hockey players turned hockey dads strongly for it.

Grant Potulny played for the Gophers and now is one of their assistant coaches. He is also a part-time assistant for the Champlin Spartans, a mites team his son Jack, 6, plays for.

Safety concerns with peewee checking bother Potulny the most. He expects opposition to a ban will fade eventually.

"It's the same way when they brought helmets in. People opposed it," Potulny said. "Today it would seem crazy not to wear helmets."

Staff writer Rachel Blount contributed to this report.

  • related content

  • No-checking proposal for peewees

    Tuesday June 7, 2011

    A USA Hockey subcommittee recommended delaying body checking until bantam level (ages 13-14). The proposal will be voted on Saturday by the USA Hockey Congress in Colorado Springs.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Tennessee 12/18/14 7:25 PM
Philadelphia 12/20/14 3:30 PM
San Diego 12/20/14 7:25 PM
San Francisco
Minnesota 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Baltimore 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Detroit 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Cleveland 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Atlanta 12/21/14 12:00 PM
New Orleans
Green Bay 12/21/14 12:00 PM
Tampa Bay
Kansas City 12/21/14 12:00 PM
New England 12/21/14 12:00 PM
NY Jets
NY Giants 12/21/14 3:05 PM
St. Louis
Buffalo 12/21/14 3:25 PM
Indianapolis 12/21/14 3:25 PM
Seattle 12/21/14 7:30 PM
Denver 12/22/14 7:30 PM
Atlanta 127 FINAL
Cleveland 98
Phoenix 111 FINAL
Charlotte 106
Dallas 117 FINAL
Detroit 106
Utah 105 FINAL
Miami 87
Orlando 92 FINAL
Boston 109
Brooklyn 89 FINAL
Toronto 105
Memphis 117 FINAL
San Antonio 116
Milwaukee 97 FINAL
Portland 104
Houston 115 FINAL
Denver 111
Indiana 100 FINAL
LA Clippers 102
Ottawa 2 FINAL
New Jersey 0
Boston 3 FINAL(OT)
Minnesota 2
Dallas 2 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Langston 65 FINAL
North Texas 78
Delaware State 72 FINAL
St Francis-NY 64
James Madison 72 FINAL
Ball State 52
SIU Edwardsville 65 FINAL
Campbell 70
St Francis-PA 67 FINAL
Duquesne 52
North Florida 77 FINAL
Florida State 93
Catawba 69 FINAL
George Mason 99
Ferrum 48 FINAL
High Point 106
Hampton 55 FINAL
Illinois 73
Gardner-Webb 65 FINAL
Jacksonville 68
Longwood 60 FINAL
Miami-Ohio 71
Arkansas State 69 FINAL
Miss State 55
Tennessee 72 FINAL
NC State 83
Ohio State 97
Manhattan 56 FINAL
Pittsburgh 65
Robert Morris 57 FINAL
Toledo 83
Char Southern 58 FINAL
Wofford 64
Kennesaw St 90 FINAL
Youngstown St 84
Barber-Scotia 52 FINAL
NC Central 108
Detroit 70 FINAL
UCF 75
Liberty 70 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 73
Denver 83
Ark-Pine Bluff 61 FINAL
Houston 56
UT Martin 54 FINAL
Illinois State 64
Milligan 76 FINAL
Louisiana 115
Abilene Christian 44 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 83
USC Upstate 73 FINAL
Memphis 83
Alcorn State 56 FINAL
Murray State 94
Central Mich 80 FINAL
Northwestern 67
Georgia State 54 FINAL
Old Dominion 58
TX-Pan American 69 FINAL
Saint Louis 75
Ill-Chicago 46 FINAL
SMU 67
Texas State 60 FINAL
Stephen F Austin 66
SC State 39 FINAL
Texas Tech 101
Missouri State 70 FINAL
Tulsa 74
Chicago State 60 FINAL
Western Ky 75
Morehead State 50 FINAL
Green Bay 66
Northern Colorado 82 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 92
Winthrop 62 FINAL
Auburn 80
New Mexico St 55 FINAL
Baylor 66
San Diego St 62 FINAL
Cincinnati 71
Eastern Mich 46 FINAL
Michigan State 66
Loyola Marymount 58 FINAL
Stanford 67
Incarnate Word 82 FINAL
Grand Canyon 80
Northeastern 58 FINAL
Cal Poly 60
Central Arkansas 55 FINAL
New Mexico 76
Howard 45 FINAL
Pepperdine 53
Portland 73 FINAL
CS-Northridge 56 FINAL
Oregon 79
Grambling St 38 FINAL
Washington 86
Nevada 12/20/14 10:00 AM
Utah State 12/20/14 1:20 PM
Texas-El Paso
(23) Utah 12/20/14 2:30 PM
Colorado State
Western Mich 12/20/14 4:45 PM
Air Force
South Alabama 12/20/14 8:15 PM
Bowling Green
BYU 12/22/14 1:00 PM
Marshall 12/23/14 5:00 PM
Northern Ill
Navy 12/23/14 8:30 PM
San Diego St
Central Mich 12/24/14 11:00 AM
Western Ky
Fresno State 12/24/14 7:00 PM
Western Carolina 79 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 66
(21) Miss State 66 FINAL
Louisiana 51
(25) DePaul 109 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 84
Liberty 64 FINAL
NC State 67
Elon 77 FINAL
Campbell 51
Akron 73 FINAL
UCF 64
Richmond 77 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 67
Montana 70 FINAL
Seattle 64
(7) Stanford 46 FINAL
Chattanooga 54
Florida A&M 69 FINAL
Southern U 80
Oklahoma 72 FINAL
(13) Duke 92
Savannah State 56 FINAL
Auburn 62
Northern Colorado 43 FINAL
South Florida 84
Youngstown St 73 FINAL
Robert Morris 65
Siena 75 FINAL
Sacred Heart 65
Vermont 63 FINAL
St Francis-NY 61
(1) South Carolina 69 FINAL
Hampton 49
Fla Gulf Coast 91 FINAL
Bethune-Cookman 46
Texas Southern 92 FINAL
Houston Baptist 80
Northwestern 88 FINAL
Appalachian St 72
NC Central 52 FINAL
Coastal Carolina 67
Drexel 50 FINAL
Quinnipiac 74
Cincinnati 52 FINAL
Northern Ky 66
Alabama State 53 FINAL
Georgia Tech 77
Morehead St 69 FINAL
USC Upstate 75
Arkansas State 59 FINAL
Kent State 44
American Univ 60 FINAL
Manhattan 52
UNC Greensboro 60 FINAL
St Bonaventure 78
Arkansas-Monticello 56 FINAL
Northwestern St 61
Prairie View 70 FINAL
Sam Houston St 51
McNeese State 59 FINAL
(3) Texas 76
Yale 90 FINAL
Wagner 65
Oakland 61 FINAL
TX A&M-CC 54
Eastern Kentucky 62 FINAL
Alabama A&M 56
SIU-Edwardsville 47 FINAL
Northern Ill 69
McMurry 25 FINAL
TX-Arlington 82
Portland 65 FINAL
Eastern Washington 72
North Texas 42 FINAL
San Francisco 60


question of the day

Poll: Who is your favorite pro sports coach in the Twin Cities?

Weekly Question





Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters