Walker unsure about effect of gay marriage
- Article by: SCOTT BAUER
- Associated Press
- May 23, 2014 - 8:50 PM
MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen asked a federal judge on Friday to place on hold any future order she may make that would strike down the state's ban on gay marriage — the second time this week the Republican expressed doubt in the state's chances to succeed in defending the law.
And Gov. Scott Walker, who voted for the state's ban and has been a longtime opponent of gay marriage, dodged questions Friday about whether he still supports the prohibition. He said he didn't know whether the ban would withstand legal challenges, and that he can't judge that because he's not an attorney.
Walker also said he didn't know how significant it would be for the state if gay marriage were to be legalized.
Van Hollen, during a Sunday interview that aired on WISN-TV, said that while he intended to aggressively defend Wisconsin's constitutional ban on gay marriage, he expected to lose in federal court given recent rulings across the country in favor of gay marriage.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in February on behalf of four gay couples challenging Wisconsin's constitutional ban on gay marriage. The lawsuit contends that the ban denies gay couples the civil rights that other married couples enjoy.
U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb has put the case on an expedited schedule and asked the ACLU not to seek a temporary halt to enforcement of the ban in the meantime, given that she hopes to rule on the merits of the case quickly.
State marriage bans have been falling around the country since the U.S. Supreme Court last year struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. Gay and lesbian couples can wed in 19 states and the District of Columbia, with Oregon and Pennsylvania becoming the latest to join the list this week when federal judges struck down their bans and officials decided not to appeal.
Wisconsin voters amended the state constitution in 2006 to outlaw gay marriage or anything substantially similar. The state has offered a domestic partner registry that affords gay couples a host of legal rights since 2009 but its future is in doubt; the conservative-leaning state Supreme Court is currently weighing whether it violates the constitution.
The lawsuit alleges that Wisconsin's ban violates the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to equal protection and due process, asserting the prohibition deprives gay couples of legal protections married couples enjoy simply because of their sex.
Van Hollen, in his motion filed Friday, said if the judge strikes down all or a part of Wisconsin's ban he would appealed the decision to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. While that appeal would be pending, Van Hollen argued, the judge should put her order on hold because clerks would be allowed to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Not preserving current law while an appeal would be pending would lead to "chaos, confusion, uncertainty, and ultimately, further litigation," Van Hollen said.
"The state is fighting tooth and nails to make sure that no same-sex couple in Wisconsin is allowed the freedom to marry, while signaling that they understand the weakness of their own legal position," ACLU attorney John Knight said.
Walker, a potential 2016 Republican candidate for president, has largely avoided talking in depth about contentious social issues. But he has a long history of opposing gay marriage and Wisconsin's 2009 domestic registry law.
His likely Democratic opponent, Mary Burke, supports legalizing gay marriage.
Walker said he didn't think gay marriage would be an issue in the race.
"Voters don't talk to me about that," he told reporters following an education awards ceremony. "They talk to me about the economy, they talk to me about their kids' schools, they talk to me about making sure we keep our finances in order."
A Marquette University law school poll released Wednesday found that 55 percent of registered Wisconsin voters favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally, while 37 percent were opposed, 6 percent said they didn't know and 2 percent refused to answer.
The poll of 805 registered voters was conducted between May 15 and Sunday. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
© 2016 Star Tribune