Philip Morris wins small victory in Thailand
- Article by: THANYARAT DOKSONE
- Associated Press
- August 27, 2013 - 4:05 AM
BANGKOK — Tobacco giant Philip Morris has won a temporary victory in its fight to keep larger health warnings off cigarettes for sale in Thailand.
The company on Tuesday praised a court's decision to temporarily suspend an Oct. 2 government deadline requiring new labels on the dangers of smoking to cover 85 percent of a cigarette package. The requirement now is for 55 percent.
Bangkok-based Philip Morris spokeswoman Onanong Pratakphiriya said such warning labels were not effective. She also said the regulation was "illogical," since it exempts cheap, roll-your-own cigarettes, which she said accounts for almost half the tobacco consumed in Thailand.
Onanong said the larger labeling was intended as a "scare tactic." She added that a recent government survey showed that health risks linked to smoking are "known universally in Thailand."
The injunction, issued by a Thai court on Friday, will stay in place, pending a lawsuit by Philip Morris and more than 1,400 Thai retailers trying to overturn the regulation. The company said it expects the legal process to take more than a year. The Public Health Ministry said it will study and likely appeal the court injunction.
Aabout 50,000 people die from smoking-related diseases each year in the Southeast Asian nation of about 65 million people.
Nopporn Cheanklin of the Public Health Ministry's Disease Control Department said larger warnings are more effective.
"The bigger the warnings are, the better we will be at preventing people from smoking," he said. Labels are meant not only to remind smokers of the risks but to prevent children from starting, he said.
"If cigarette packages are attractive, youngsters will be drawn to them," Nopporn said. "Our goal is to scare (children), so there won't be any new smokers."
The lawsuit also contends the regulation is illegal because it was enacted without consulting the Thai tobacco industry — retailers, distributors, manufacturers and others — which will be most affected by the labels and suffer "potential negative consequences."
© 2013 Star Tribune