ADVERTISEMENT

The FAA has granted permits to law enforcement agencies to use small drones, such as this Shadow­Hawk drone in Montgomery County, Texas.

LANCE BERTOLINO , Vanguard Defense via AP

Seattle police officer Reuben Omelanchuk controlled the Dragonflyer X6 drone. Though the drones never went into service, the city announced the end of its drone program because of public protest.

Alan Berner , Seattle Times via Associated Press

A milder version of drones is taking flight

  • Article by: The Economist
  • February 17, 2013 - 7:03 PM

 

Whenever a hiker gets lost in Mesa County, a rugged area in western Colorado, Benjamin Miller of the local police force does not bother to join the search on foot. His department is a trailblazer in the use of unmanned aircraft, so instead he launches a drone equipped with an infrared camera to search from the skies. No wayward ramblers have been rescued in this way yet, but he hopes to find one soon.

Drones are best known for their role in the Afghan war, where they both monitor and strike at enemy forces. Now the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been ordered to find a way to integrate them into American airspace by 2015.

The attraction of drones for domestic users is their ability to carry sensors, such as cameras and spectrometers, rather than weapons. This suggests that they could be useful in commerce and research, as well as in policing.

Already scores of organizations have received special FAA approval to fly drones. Although there is no regularly updated master list in the public domain, organizations that have received permission range from universities in Michigan and North Dakota to the Departments of Agriculture and Energy. A number are police departments, and it is this development that is stirring up concerns about privacy and protests from local residents.

Their fears are centered on the prospect of surveillance. Since drones can be far cheaper to buy than helicopters, costing tens of thousands of dollars as compared to a few million, the worry is that cameras will be sent up into the sky far more frequently. Even if they are not on a deliberate spy mission, they may capture incidental footage that leads to an investigation, such as evidence of marijuana plantations.

Still, at least in Mesa County, the drones have been used for search-and-rescue efforts and photographing crime scenes, nothing more.

“We’re not spying on everybody,” Miller says. “We haven’t done a single surveillance mission.”

In any case, it may not be so easy for a police department to perform round-the-clock surveillance. Their drones are much less sophisticated than the military’s Predators, which can remain aloft for 40 hours at a height of 25,000 feet.

However, the Department of Homeland Security has purchased 10 Reapers, a new version of the Predator, for border patrols. The FAA specifies that drones used by public-safety agencies must weigh 4.4 pounds or less, which can be increased to 25 pounds if the operator is judged proficient. They also are governed by strict rules in the air: They cannot fly higher than 400 feet and must remain within the line of sight of the operator.

Some police forces, however, face obstacles. Florida lawmakers have proposed limiting their use in the state. In Seattle two drones that were bought in 2010 for police use have never gone into service. After a hullabaloo, the mayor announced that the program was to be scrapped.

It will soon be easier for police forces to have more eyes in the sky, but first they will have to win over a hostile public.

 

© 2014 Star Tribune