file, Star Tribune
Vouchers are not best bet for Minnesota schools
- Article by: TOM DOOHER
- February 7, 2013 - 7:25 PM
When even an advocate of private-school choice has to admit there is no convincing evidence that vouchers produce better student achievement ("Minnesota falls behind on school choice," Jan. 28) it raises the question: How is Minnesota missing the boat?
In fact, the preponderance of impartial research shows that vouchers are not a good deal for students or taxpayers. Meanwhile, Minnesota has been recognized for its array of public-school choices. Our state has wisely chosen not to divert scarce tax dollars to private schools, but to invest in public-school programs open to all.
This year, many of our state's leaders have come to recognize that early learning is the best investment we can make. Gov. Mark Dayton and a number of lawmakers are promoting an expansion of all-day kindergarten and preschool programs.
Education Minnesota strongly supports free all-day kindergarten for every Minnesota child, with additional investment in pre-K programs as money becomes available.
Early childhood programs have high rates of return on investment, but they are not cheap. Dayton's $130 million kindergarten and early childhood budget only begins to cover the cost. Wisconsin's voucher program cost $150 million last year, and lawmakers want to expand it.
Such expenditures in Minnesota would make it that much harder to fund the expansion of all-day kindergarten, early childhood and other public-school programs that actually improve academic achievement.
Most of Minnesota's students are, and will continue to be, in public K-12 schools. Minnesota doesn't need an expensive private-school choice program that benefits relatively few.
Tom Dooher is president of Education Minnesota, a union of 70,000 Minnesota educators.
© 2016 Star Tribune