Gov. Mark Dayton delivered his State of the State Address on Feb. 6, 2013.
Jeff Wheeler, Star Tribune
* * *
"If you're coming to this State Capitol during the next four months, bring your best ideas and your sincere convictions. ... If you're interested in nothing more than throwing rocks and casting blame, send the rest of us a letter, or a postcard. But if you really want to pitch in ... even sacrifice a little of your self-interest for everyone's better interest, welcome. We need you. Your state needs you."
Source: -Gov. Mark Dayton, State of the State address
Dayton opens door for better tax ideas
- Article by: EDITORIAL BOARD
- Star Tribune
- February 7, 2013 - 10:46 AM
Minnesota's gubernatorial bully pulpit is well-employed when it helps citizens see and prepare for the future. Gov. Mark Dayton did a goodly amount of that kind of preaching in his third State of the State address Wednesday night as he pleaded for renewed investment in education.
"The old order doesn't show any signs of coming back," the DFL governor said. "Our state and our nation are engulfed by the new global economy. We either act now to move ahead, or let ourselves fall behind."
Dayton made his prescription for moving ahead on Jan. 22, in a budget proposal that has rightly encountered considerable resistance -- including from this page -- for its uncompetitive proposal to apply the sales tax to business-related services. He acknowledged the furor, and -- perhaps tellingly -- declined to defend that flawed aspect of his budget plan. Instead, he signaled willingness to entertain other ideas.
"Plan A is the one I have proposed, or something close to it. Plan B is to stick with our current tax structure, or something close to it. Plan C is something better. No one would be happier than me to see a good Plan C," he said.
We'll be offering just such a plan in the weeks ahead. Legislators and other Minnesotans should take him up on that offer, too, and help craft an alternative budget that omits his economically disruptive overreach on business sales taxes.
As they do, they should not lose sight of the future that Dayton described. As state economist Tom Stinson told a legislative panel this week, the new economy will require a better-educated, more-productive workforce than Minnesota has been producing in recent years.
Dayton made the case that lagging education spending, particularly for higher education, is putting Minnesota at competitive risk. He noted that by one measure, Minnesota's higher-education spending ranks 32nd among the states, and that when adjusted for inflation, this year's state postsecondary spending is lower than at any time since 1980-81. Higher tuition and rising student debt have been the result.
"Does anyone believe that continuing to reduce our commitment to higher education is the path to a better Minnesota?" Dayton asked.
The state's business community does not, judging from last year's Itasca Project report that decried Minnesota's skid in higher-education spending. But the same community has faulted Dayton for not wringing more savings from existing state spending.
Dayton was at his most defensive as he responded to that criticism. Reform of health care delivery and purchasing, information technology operations and environmental permitting on his watch are producing savings, he said.
But the search for efficiency is never done in modern enterprises. Dayton acknowledged that there's more to do: "We're not done reforming. We're just getting started." He invited the Legislature to declare an "unsession" in 2014, devoted to repealing outdated mandates and streamlining service delivery. He asked willing citizens to help.
That idea is bound to strike some as election-year hokum. But at its core is welcome gubernatorial recognition that government systems that worked well a generation or two ago are overdue for an upgrade.
Dayton cast himself as a reformer last night. If he can engage citizens in remaking state government for the 21st century -- and embrace policies that will build a stronger state economy -- he will have earned the label.
An editorial of the Star Tribune, Minneapolis.
© 2016 Star Tribune