Seizing of hostages may draw U.S. into North Africa conflict
- Article by: ADAM NOSSITER and SCOTT SAYARE
- New York Times
- January 16, 2013 - 10:13 PM
BAMAKO, MALI - The French military assault on Islamist extremists in Mali escalated into a potentially much broader North African conflict on Wednesday when, in retribution, attackers seized an internationally managed natural gas field in neighboring Algeria and took at least 20 foreign hostages, including Americans.
Algerian officials said at least two people, including a Briton, were killed in the assault, which began with a predawn ambush on a bus attempting to ferry gas-field workers to an airport. Hundreds of Algerian security forces were sent to surround the gas-field compound, creating a standoff, and the country's interior minister said there would be no negotiations.
Algeria's official news agency said at least 20 fighters had carried out the attack and mass abduction. There were unconfirmed reports late Wednesday that the security forces had tried to storm the compound and had retreated under gunfire from the hostage takers.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta called the attack a terrorist act and said the United States was weighing a response. His statement suggested that the Obama administration could be drawn into a military entanglement in North Africa that it had been seeking to keep at arm's length -- even as it has conceded that the region has become a haven for extremists affiliated with Al-Qaida who threaten Western interests.
"It is a very serious matter when Americans are taken hostage along with others," Panetta said during a visit to Italy. "I want to assure the American people that the United States will take all necessary and proper steps that are required to deal with this situation."
Completely by surprise
Many details of the assault on the gas field in a desert site near Libya's border remained murky, including the precise number of hostages, which could be as high as 41, according to claims by the attackers quoted by regional news agencies. U.S., French, British, Japanese and Norwegian nationals who worked at the field were known to be among them, officials said.
The attack, which seemed to take foreign governments and the British and Norwegian companies that help run the facility completely by surprise, appeared to make good on a pledge by the Islamist militants who seized northern Mali last year to sharply expand their struggle against the West in response to France's military intervention that began last week.
The hostage taking potentially broadened the conflict beyond Mali's borders and raised the possibility of drawing an increasing number of foreign countries into direct involvement, particularly if expatriates working in the vast energy-extraction industries of North Africa become targets. It also doubled, at least, the number of non-African hostages that Islamist militants in northern and western Africa have been using as bargaining chips to finance themselves in recent years through ransoms that have totaled millions of dollars.
But there was no indication that the gas-field attackers wanted money. Instead, in a statement sent to ANI, a Mauritanian news agency, they demanded the "immediate halt of the aggression against our own in Mali."
The statement, made by a group called Al Mulathameen, which has links to Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of Al-Qaida, claimed it was holding more than 40 "crusaders" -- apparently a reference to non-Muslims -- "including seven Americans, two French, two British as well as other citizens of various European nationalities."
The gas-field attack coincided with an escalation of the fight inside Mali, according to Western and Malian officials, as French ground troops, joined by soldiers of the Malian army, engaged with Islamist fighters in ground combat. The officials said the French-Malian units had begun to beat back the Islamist militant advance southward from northern Mali, a move that had provoked the intervention ordered by President Francois Hollande of France.
The attackers seemed particularly incensed that Algeria's government had permitted the French to use Algerian airspace to fly warplanes and military equipment into Mali, according to their statement, which may explain why they chose Algeria for retaliation. Some Algerian military experts said the Algerian public also was unhappy about the government's decision.
"The setting in motion of a military machine in north Mali was going to have definite repercussions in Algeria," said Mohamed Chafik Mesbah, a former Algerian army officer and political scientist reached by telephone in Algiers. "This is only the beginning. There are going to be much worse consequences. There will be more attacks."
© 2016 Star Tribune