ADVERTISEMENT

FILE -- Everett Wilkinson, a tea party leader, in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., Oct. 20, 2010.

Michael Mcelroy, New York Times

Tax fight exposes divisions in GOP

  • Article by: MICHAEL D. SHEAR and
  • JIM RUTENBERG
  • January 5, 2013 - 6:47 PM

 

WASHINGTON - When Republican leaders in Congress agreed to raise taxes on the wealthy last week, it left the increasingly fractured and feuding party unified on perhaps only one point: that it is at a major crossroads.

From Mitt Romney's loss on Election Day through the recent tax fight that shattered party discipline in the House, Republicans have seen the foundations of their political strategy called into question, stirring an urgent debate about how to reshape and redefine their party.

At issue immediately is whether that can be achieved through a shift in tactics and tone, or will instead require a deeper rethinking of the party's longtime positions on such bedrock issues as guns and immigration. President Obama intends to test the willingness of Republicans to bend on those issues in the first months of his new term, when he plans to push for stricter gun control and an immigration overhaul.

'The country is changing'

The legislative battles are certain to expose even more division in the party. And with establishment Republicans and Tea Party activists at times speaking as if they are from different parties, concern is spreading in the ranks that things could get worse before they get better.

"The Republican Party can't stay exactly where it is and stick its head in the sand and ignore the fact that the country is changing," said Ralph Reed, the founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition. "On the other hand, if the party were to retreat on core, pro-family stands and its positions on fiscal responsibility and taxes, it could very quickly find itself without a strong demographic support base."

Having lost the popular vote in five of the past six presidential elections, Republicans now face a country that is increasingly younger, multi-ethnic and skeptical of GOP positions on some social issues. The party's deficit-cutting agenda relies heavily on reducing taxes for the wealthy, which irks middle-class voters, and cutting spending on popular government programs, like Social Security and Medicare.

Generational change is also robbing the party of some of its most effective political positions. Same-sex marriage, which less than a decade ago was an issue that reliably drove conservative voters to the polls, appears to be losing its potency with an electorate increasingly comfortable with gay unions.

Prominent Republicans insist that if the party's disparate factions can come together around a set of economic, social and foreign policy principles in the coming years, they stand a good chance of retaking the presidency, making gains in Congress and repairing some of the damage done through years of bitter primary battles and divisive legislative bickering.

'Most visible personalities'

"Republicans will get their mojo back when they define themselves as the party of economic growth and upward mobility," said Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana, a Republican who will become the president of Purdue University next week. Daniels said new lawmakers and governors, many of whom are minority members and women, would reshape the GOP.

"The party, with all its problems -- and I'm not disputing them -- has a really large and interesting crop of new faces," he said. "Ultimately, parties tend to be defined by their most visible personalities."

Republicans have already demonstrated success in midterm elections, when fewer people vote, and in state elections. In North Carolina, Pat McCrory was sworn in as governor on Saturday after waging a campaign that emphasized pragmatism over ideology. "My message remained a Republican message," McCrory said. "But I did it with a tone of problem solving. I did it with a tone of cooperation."

But a changed tone alone may not do enough to smooth over the very real disagreements within the party. And it is not clear how the intra-party combatants can meet in the middle. For example, while some Republicans argued that the tax vote last week enshrined almost all of the Bush-era tax cuts into permanent law and should be seen as a victory, harder-line fiscal conservatives called it a shameful departure from the party's two decades of successful opposition to tax increases.

Across the country, deeply conservative organizations angry about the tax concession are pledging more primary challenges to Republicans they believe are straying too far from the party's orthodoxy.

Moderate Republicans are bracing for the challenges. "There has to be an acceptance within the party of people who have nonidentical views on every issue," said former Rep. Steven LaTourette of Ohio, who will become the president of the Republican Main Street Partnership. "You can't be a national party unless you invite in and are accepting of members with different visions. You can't treat them as pariahs."

© 2014 Star Tribune