Hector Casanova/Kansas City Star/MCT
Hector Casanova, Kansas City Star/MCT
FILE - In this April, 15, 2008, file photo, Dana Pinero, of New York, foreground, waits in line to mail tax returns for both herself and her boyfriend at the James A. Farley Main Post Office in New York. The package of tax increases and spending cuts known as the �fiscal cliff� takes effect on January 1, 2013, unless Congress passes a budget deal by then. The economy would be hit so hard that it would likely sink into recession in the first half of 2013, economists say.
Tina Fineberg, Associated Press - Ap
More costly than higher taxes: Rash decisions
- Article by: PAUL SULLIVAN
- New York Times
- November 24, 2012 - 8:40 PM
With the ominous talk of tax increases and a fiscal cliff if President Obama and congressional leaders can't agree on a plan to avert automatic tax increases by Dec. 31, some investors may be tempted to act soon to take advantage of current tax rates.
But financial advisers say that in their rush to do something this year, investors may end up with regrets.
"Any time you make a decision purely for tax reasons, it has a way of coming back and biting you," said Mag Black-Scott, chief executive of Beverly Hills Wealth Management. "Could you be at a 43 percent tax on dividends instead of 15 percent? The straight answer is yes, of course you could. But what if that doesn't happen? What if they increase just slightly?"
Various proposals are on the table, but taxes the wealthy say they worry most about are an increase in the capital gains rate to 20 percent from 15 percent, which would affect investments like stocks and second homes; an increase in the 15 percent tax on dividends; and a limitation on deductions. For the truly wealthy, there is also the question of what will happen to estate and gift taxes.
Taking taxes on capital gains as an example, Black-Scott said people need to remember the rates were 28 percent when Ronald Reagan was president. "If they go from 15 to 20 percent, is it really that bad?" she asked. "You need to say, 'Do I like the stock?' If you do, why would you get rid of it?"
Here is a look at some of the top areas where short-term decisions based solely on taxes could end up hindering long-term investment goals.
Appreciated stock: Many people have large holdings in a single stock, often the result of working for a company for many years. And the stock may have appreciated significantly over that time. But if they are selling now solely for tax reasons, advisers say they shouldn't. The stock may continue to do well and more than compensate for increased capital gains.
But there is an upside to an increase in the capital gains rate: wealthier clients may finally be pushed to diversify holdings. "If you have 75 percent of your wealth in one stock, then it's a really appropriate time to think about this," said Timothy Lee, managing director of Monument Wealth Management.
Selling stock now may also make sense when it is in the form of stock options set to expire early next year. "Do you want to take the risk the price will drop in January?" asked Melissa Labant, director of the tax team at the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Bonds: Bonds sold to finance state and local government projects are tax-free now and will be tax-free next year. That is no reason to load up on them.
Tax-free municipal bonds have always been attractive to people in higher-income tax brackets. Now, advisers fear individuals just above the $200,000 threshold will try to offset that increase by moving more of their investments into municipal bonds.
Beth Gamel, a certified public accountant and executive vice president at Pillar Financial Advisers, imagined a case where people in higher tax brackets, thinking they were acting rationally, sold stocks this year to take advantage of the lower capital gains rates and then, to avoid higher taxes next year, put all or some of that money into municipal bonds. Maybe they outsmart the tax man, but they do so at risk to their retirement.
"It will be very difficult for them to reach their long-term goals," she said, "because the yield on muni bonds is lower than stocks over time."
Real estate: Advisers also say they are concerned people will consider selling their home for fear the appreciation on it will be more heavily taxed next year. Labant said most home sales were never taxed because the first $500,000 of appreciation was exempt for a couple (or $250,000 for a single person). Even if you are subject to capital gains tax, it is only on the amount above the exemption level. "Don't run out and sell your home," she said, "because you may have received bad advice."
Insurance tricks: Annuities are another area where people might rush in to avoid taxes. As with any insurance product, annuities get preferential tax treatment. They also offer a guaranteed stream of income.
But they're also complicated products and carry all sorts of fees.
"I'm concerned that aggressive insurance people are going to see this as a time to sell annuities," Gamel said. "Annuities are among the most complex investment products there are. If we only have between now and Dec. 31, we don't have enough time to assess them."
Simpler solutions: The prevailing advice is to wait and see. Andrew Ahrens, president of Ahrens Investment Partners in Louisiana, took this a step further. He said he was telling clients that whatever happened next year could be reversed in two years with the next Congress, or in four with the next president.
But if that's too long to wait, investors have an easier option. They can move assets that are likely to be taxed at a higher rate -- like taxable bonds and dividend-paying stocks -- into retirement accounts and defer the tax, and put assets they don't plan to sell into taxable accounts.
© 2016 Star Tribune