fact100708
On the homepage
Afghanistan
Out There
Thanksgiving
Reusse's Turkey
Home | Politically Connected | National Politics | U.S. Senate
Continued: Franken, Coleman ads cross line between fact, fiction
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on Digg
U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman's role in addressing alleged contract abuse in the Iraq war is the focus of an ad by his challenger, Al Franken, and a counterattack ad by Coleman.
Franken's ad is blunt: "As chairman of the most powerful investigative committee in the Senate, Norm Coleman had the perfect perch to look into no-bid contracts in Iraq. But Coleman did nothing."
Coleman's counterattack accuses Franken of "fiction" and credits the senator for the uncovering of "$80 billion in waste, fraud and abuse" and having "championed an independent Iraq investigator."
The ad from DFLer Franken survives the counterattack because of its narrow focus. In accusing Coleman of doing nothing, Franken targets the Republican senator's former role as chairman of the investigations panel. The Coleman ad doesn't directly refute that claim but notes that the senator supported other actions that addressed contract abuse in Iraq and elsewhere.
But the Franken ad exaggerates in a way not raised by the Coleman commercial. In tying Coleman to a contractor at the heart of the bidding controversy, the Franken ad's wording could lead viewers to conclude that the connection was greater than proven.
Voters must decide
Franken's ad begins by citing a portion of a Star Tribune editorial in 2005 that said the senator, then chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, had the "perfect perch" to launch an investigation into no-bid contracts in Iraq. The editorial urged looking into those contracts.
In the context of Coleman's role as subcommittee chairman, the Franken ad asserted that the senator "did nothing" related to questionable Iraq contracts and said there was "no investigation of no-bid contracts, no hearings on billions of dollars of waste and fraud."
The Coleman campaign struck back with "the real Coleman record," saying his panel exposed the misspending of $80 billion, that he pushed for an independent Iraq investigator and "supported over 100 nonpartisan reviews including no-bid contracts."
The $80 billion figure refers to subcommittee inquiries since 2003, focusing on issues other than alleged Iraq bid-rigging, such as abusive credit practices, vulnerabilities in homeland security and Medicare.
The independent investigator referred to in Coleman's ad wasn't part of Coleman's panel but the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR). The "nonpartisan reviews" that Coleman supported refer to 122 SIGIR audits from 2004 to 2008.
Coleman was among a group of senators who pushed in 2006 and 2007 to extend and reinforce SIGIR.
The subcommittee Coleman headed has a history of conducting aggressive investigations into military contract abuse, and Coleman's critics say he should have used it to conduct hearings into allegations that surfaced in 2003 about the Iraq contracts. Coleman says that SIGIR and other entities were better suited for the job and that he focused on exposing waste, fraud and abuse in other areas of government.
Ultimately, it's up to voters to decide whether the panel should have taken up the Iraq contracts.
The Franken ad ends by saying, "Coleman did take $100,000 from defense contractors like Halliburton." That firm was the most prominent player in the controversy over no-bid Iraq contracts and was under investigation by the FBI.
Coleman's campaign received $110,000 from political action committees or individuals associated with the defense sector. Only $4,000 of it had clear Halliburton connections.
Using the phrase "defense contractors like Halliburton" could lead some viewers to conclude that most or all of the campaign contributions came from contractors accused of contract problems, when the ad offers no proof that occurred.
Pat Doyle • 612-222-1210
Previous pageRecent U.S. Senate stories
Senator: Oversight needed at ailing pension agency, controversial contracts should be rebid - October 6, 2008
Senator: Oversight needed at ailing pension agency, controversial contracts should be rebid - The rapidly deteriorating financial health of the federal agency that guarantees 44 million Americans' pensions is raising alarms in Congress, where key lawmakers are demanding tougher rules to insure vigilant oversight of its multibillion-dollar investment portfolio. More
The Whistleblower blog has moved
The Star Tribune is still blowing the whistle, but our look and location have changed. Click here to get to the new blog. If you want the actual URL, it’s www.startribune.com/blogs/whistleblower.html. Our blog posts will now be easier to search on the web site, but you’ll need to register to post a comment. In the [...]
Recent posts
  1000s of HomesListings, open houses, the hottest market news. Start and end your search for a new home here. |
Win tickets to Vita.mn's second annual Snowball: An Old School Funk and Rollerdisco at St. Louis Park's Roller Gardens.Vita.mn and Ragstock present the second annual Snowball: An Old School Funk and Rollerdisco at St. Louis Park's Roller Gardens on Dec. 11. |
Comment on this story | Read all 19 comments | Hide reader comments