Dayton draws line on scope of tax hikes in Minnesota

  • Article by: BAIRD HELGESON and RACHEL E. STASSEN-BERGER , Star Tribune staff writers
  • Updated: April 29, 2013 - 6:08 AM

Governor says he’ll reject any plan that raises overall taxes on the middle class.


Gov. Mark Dayton won't support taxes on clothing or middle-class families. "That position is about as foundational as anything," he said.

Photo: Glen Stubbe, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Gov. Mark Dayton says he will draw the line at any spending plan that raises overall taxes on the middle class.

Heading into the crucial, final weeks of the legislative session, the governor says he can compromise on other issues with his fellow DFLers who control the Capitol, but he won’t agree to a clothing tax that would hit families or an income tax increase that reaches beyond the wealthiest Minnesotans.

“That position is about as foundational as anything, as I go into negotiations,” Dayton said in an interview with the Star Tribune.

DFL leaders in both the House and Senate are pushing their own plans for tax increases on a range of sources including income, alcohol, cigarettes and clothing, setting the stage for a three-way clash in a one-party government.

Dayton’s stance against taxes that touch the middle-class is not absolute. He has hinted strongly that he is open to the possibility of some increase in the so-called sin taxes on cigarettes and alcohol.

But he has already publicly dismissed the Senate clothing tax plan and a House effort to impose an income tax surcharge on the wealthy that would catapult Minnesota’s tax rate to among the nation’s highest.

The House wants to make good on DFL campaign promises to restore education funding and lower property taxes, while Dayton is intent on his original goal of taxing the top 2 percent as a way of bringing in new revenue without hitting everyday Minnesotans.

Senators, who are not up for re-election next year, are looking for stable sources of new revenue that could lay the foundation for years of innovation and reform.

Even if some of the House and Senate proposals fall away, others that are more likely to pass, such as cigarette and alcohol taxes, could bring a new wave of revenue to the state’s depleted treasury. Advocates of adopting those measure say the money could spur advances in education and economic development all while driving down property taxes.

Waiting in the background at the Capitol are Republicans who were jettisoned into the minority by voters last year. GOP leaders say they believe that DFLers are falling into the classic trap of overreach and that the more DFLers bulk up on new taxes, the wider the Republican path back to power becomes.

“We are seeing the results of one-party power and I don’t think the result is going to be good for Minnesota,” said Sen. Dave Senjem, R-Rochester.

Even DFLers are predicting that the final few weeks of the session could be rocky.

“I think there will be a blowup,” said Rep. Ann Len­czewski, DFL-Bloomington, chairwoman of the House Taxes Committee. “But I think what will be more important is that there will be a more conscious awareness that all three need to feel good and need to save face and that they are balanced.”

Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, a DFLer from Cook and former union negotiator, is pushing Dayton and House leaders to broaden the sales tax to clothing and consumer services like auto repair, while lowering the overall sales tax rate to 6 percent from 6.875.

That would put Minnesota’s sales tax system more in line with other states. But recent polling and a log of calls to the governor’s office show Minnesotans are staunchly against a tax on clothing.

Dayton originally proposed a broadened, lower sales tax that would affect consumers and businesses alike, but few rallied to his cause. Now, he said, he will not accept a sales tax proposal that nicks consumers alone.

That “becomes a regressive tax on the middle-income people and families,” Dayton said. “My fundamental position is that I oppose that.”

Dayton also dismissed the House’s proposed temporary income tax surcharge on those who make more than $500,000 a year. That plan would bring in a giant sum — about $1.2 billion over two years — but would put Minnesota firmly among the highest taxing states in the country.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters