YOUR GUIDE TO THE TWIN CITIES
Minnesota's financial shortfall for road and bridge maintenance has been decades in the making, the result of complex political tensions, but the disaster may have changed the money picture at last.
Three times, Gov. Arne Carlson's office had a news release ready on a gas tax increase. Each time, he stopped short, deterred by a rural/urban split over how to spend the money. • Gov. Jesse Ventura won praise for a spare-the-rich lowering of license tab fees, but the move cut deep into transportation funding. • Gov. Tim Pawlenty's no-new-taxes roadblock, which impressed conservative admirers, became the rationale for his veto of two transportation bills.
Over the past 20 years, Minnesota's transportation funding for roads, bridges and transit has failed to keep pace with needs -- a point on which a broad consensus had emerged even before the collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge. In the aftermath of that disaster, there are signs that longstanding disagreements over how to raise and where to spend more transportation revenue may at last be resolved.
"The trick was to get this issue to become a top-tier political matter," said Curt Johnson, a former Metropolitan Council chairman and chief of staff for Carlson. "At 6:05 on August 1, one bridge collapsing may have done what no amount of advertising or lobbying could have ever done."
With every passing year, Minnesota faces an estimated $1.7 billion shortfall in funding needed to meet demands for maintenance, repairs and improvements. This is no pork-barrel pol's wish list. The projects on it are the hard-headed calculation of inspectors, engineers and analysts.
How did it get this way?
This year, Minnesota will collect about $650 million through its 20-cents-per-gallon gasoline tax. Another $478 million comes through license tab fees, while vehicle sales taxes produce $154 million.
That seems like a lot of money, especially when combined with Minnesota's share of federal highway funds and other smaller funding sources.
But the gasoline tax has been stuck at 20 cents per gallon since 1988. Adjusted for inflation, its real value has fallen by more than one-third.
Unlike that tax, which has long been dedicated to roads and bridges, the motor vehicle sales tax was not dedicated until last fall. In November voters approved a constitutional amendment phasing in a dedication of vehicle sales taxes to roads and transit.
But over the years, that revenue has often been tapped when funding crises have popped up elsewhere in the general budget.
License tab fee revenues took a hit when Ventura capped them at $99, creating a revenue hole that never was filled.
Historic struggles
The tension over whether and how to increase the gas tax has dogged governors and legislators.
Carlson said the state's transportation funding formulas are "very convoluted" and can come down to political divisions.
The formulas, he said, are "very old" and reflect a time when rural legislators held considerably more power at the Legislature than they do now. But the biggest hindrance, Carlson said, is Minnesota's inflexibility on how it can spend gas tax revenue. The constitution dictates that gas tax money be spent on roads and bridges. It cannot be used for transit.
In 1993, Carlson said, a gas tax increase never even made it out of DFL-dominated committees because "city folks wanted more for transit and rural folks didn't."
Old vs. new
Building shiny new roads and bridges often is more tempting than shoveling money into the essential but dull job of fixing old stuff.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT