perdiem022207
On the homepage
Obama
Out There
Music review
Al Franken
$30-a-day expense increase easily passes Senate
State senators voted to uphold the bump in their daily expense allowance and require "nay" voters to request reimbursement.
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on DiggMore from Politically Connected
In an unusual vote hailed by bipartisan leaders as a victory for government transparency, state senators on Wednesday overwhelmingly ratified a 45 percent increase in their daily expense allowances.
The vote of 59 to 7 upheld a $30-a-day boost in so-called per diem payments, to $96, that most senators already have been collecting for weeks. Legislators receive the daily allowance each day they are in session, without having to show actual expenses.
Fifteen Republicans joined all 44 DFLers on the prevailing side. Under the resolution, the seven GOP senators who turned thumbs-down will have to file public written requests to claim any per diem from now on.
"This has been a strange and peculiar process that shows disrespect for the members," said one of the naysayers, Sen. David Hann, R-Eden Prairie.
An hour of debate couldn't clarify the actual effect of the vote, the first in memory by a full chamber of the Minnesota Legislature on expense allowances. Such decisions have traditionally been completed in committee.
Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller, DFL-Minneapolis, said defeat of the resolution would have ended all per diem pay. But Sen. Ray Vandeveer, R-Forest Lake, whom Pogemiller hailed for pushing the issue to the floor, said the vote he had called for would have changed nothing. "Lack of action does not undo what the committee ratified," Vandeveer said.
Equally murky is the political impact of the controversy on senators' reelection bids nearly four years from now. But some Republicans suggested that fatter expense accounts for legislators are a harbinger of tax and spending increases in the next state budget.
The debate highlighted the delicacy of discussions about compensation for most legislators. Legislative salaries haven't budged from $31,140 a year since 1999, largely because votes of the full House and Senate are required to raise them. But expense allowances for mileage, housing and hotel lodging in addition to per diem have been increased by committee action in recent years.
A salary raise instead?
Sen. Geoff Michel, R-Edina, voted against the resolution Wednesday, saying that legislators should wait until they've done more work this session before raising their pay. "If we believe we need more compensation, let's do it through salary," he said. "I don't know how we spend $96 a day on meals. That's a pretty healthy diet."
He said salary levels should follow recommendations of the state Compensation Council, which most recently called for raising legislators' pay to $45,956 a year -- a bump that would more than triple the per diem increase for most senators.
But no one else dared to suggest what legislators ought to be paid. Both Pogemiller and Minority Leader David Senjem, R-Rochester, instead stressed the openness of the proceedings.
"For us, it wasn't a matter of dollars so much as creating an open process," said Senjem, who voted for the per diem raise both in committee and on the floor. "There is always some political gamesmanship in everything that happens here, and it seems that the wording of the resolution was meant to shame anyone who chose to vote against it."
Pogemiller denied that, saying written requests for per diem payments from the no voters would simply clarify their intent for Senate paymasters.
Conrad deFiebre • 651-222-1673 • cdefiebre@startribune.com
HOW THEY VOTED
For the roll call, go to www.startribune.com/a2344.
- Palin resignation leaves questions on 2012 run
- Enough about Senate race and Jackson, Pawlenty says
- Obama's diplomacy being tested in Russia
- Marvin Ramstad, 89, father of congressman, judge dies
- Obama to mark July 4, daughter's birthday Saturday
- Palin's mode of exit tarnishes her future
- Official: Nuclear agreement expected from summit
- Former D.C. Mayor Barry charged with stalking a woman
- Obama, Medvedev agree to pursue nuclear reduction
- Medvedev: Russia, US must cooperate closely against nuclear proliferation, doesn't name Iran
Bank fees torment an identity theft victim, and park board tributes have a time limit: Whistleblower weekend roundup
Katie Trottier of Minneapolis turned to Whistleblower when she couldn’t persuade U.S. Bank to forgive overdraft fees charged to her after a thief drained her checking account. Whistleblower reporter Lora Pabst described the bank’s change of heart when confronted with the facts. In the Sunday Whistleblower column, I described how Vivian Mason, a Minneapolis park [...]
Recent posts
  Open positions!A new career awaits. Look through thousands of listings to find your new job. Start now! No resume? No problem!Create a skills profile in minutes, let a recruiter match you to an open position. Click here to get started. |
Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments