smoke022007
On the homepage
Music
Out There
Politics
Joe Mauer
Amended smoking-ban bill would allow bar ventilation
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on DiggMore from Politically Connected
Bars would be permitted to install ventilation devices instead of facing an outright ban on smoking after a bill that would have eliminated smoking statewide was significantly amended in a Senate committee Monday.
The amendments, which are likely to be challenged in further committee action, would severely hinder efforts by smoking ban advocates, who are pushing for a statewide ban in bars and restaurants. But even ban opponents quietly acknowledged that the amendments are probably just a blip in the debate on the ban proposal, which enjoys bipartisan support in the House and Senate.
The proposal approved Monday would phase in the requirements for ventilation, depending on how much alcohol the bar sells as a percentage of its revenue.
Another amendment removes a provision that allows counties and municipalities to impose stronger ordinances than any state statute.
Supporters who had hoped for a streamlined process are witnessing their first major hurdle in what is considered the Senate's most business-friendly committee, the Business Industry and Jobs Committee. It rejected a proposal to give bars until 2009 to comply with a full ban.
"This still has a long way to go," said the bill's chief author, Sen. Kathy Sheran, DFL-Mankato.
'No system is adequate'
Whether any ventilation system can effectively filter the harmful effects of second-hand smoke has been a significant part of the debate.
In places like St. Paul, which instituted its own smoking restrictions, some bars and restaurants already have ventilation devices that owners say are effective.
Ban supporters say the carcinogenic effects of second-hand smoke cannot be removed: "No ventilation system is adequate," said Sen. Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park.
The Senate version now heads to at least two other committees before a vote on the Senate floor. The House version, which still proposes an outright ban, also awaits further committee action.
Mark Brunswick • 651-222-1636 • mbrunswick@startribune.com
- Republicans send Franken $95K after Senate case
- Pope presses Obama on abortion, stem cells
- WHITE HOUSE NOTEBOOK: Obama staffers meet pope
- Obama: Washington and Moscow must lead on nukes
- Republican: Sotomayor had ties to extreme group
- Enough about Senate race and Jackson, Pawlenty says
- Obama hints he'll attend World Cup in South Africa
Overdraft fees, the bane of Whistleblower readers, are big money for banks, USA Today reports
Maybe I’m naive, but Whistleblower was astonished to read that overdraft fees of the sort that tormented Katie Trottier and numerous other readers are a major profit center for banks, USA Today reporter Kathy Chu reported this week. I guess I labored under the impression that the fees still reflected some actual cost on the [...]
Recent posts
|
|
Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments