And to those of you on the other side, a challenge.
To all of the Star Tribune readers who think the newspaper leans to the left: That cannot be further from the truth. There was no mention on Aug. 13 of “National Lefties Day,” in honor of all lefthanded people forced into a righthanded world. So, I challenge all of you righthanded miscreants to live in a lefty world for one month — your computer mouse, scissors, three-ring binders, spiral notebooks, a handheld can-opener, a pull cord on a lawn mower or chain saw (user beware!). Need help? We’ll just tell you to turn everything upside down. How does that make you feel? Can’t imagine you’ll prove me wrong, as you are a lazy bunch.
In all seriousness, give it a try for a month and see what life is like. Game on — should you have the curiosity to be on the other side!
Shelly Kremers, Minneapolis
Altruism, not money, motivates donors
I’m a bone-marrow transplant survivor, and will correct some points in Michael Rush’s Aug. 16 commentary (“Let’s put a price tag on marrow donations”). Bone marrow transplants use a renewable cell material, like blood. Many patients don’t have matches in their own family, so they rely on the Be The Match registry. The chance that a patient will find a match varies by ethnic type, but as a Caucasian, my odds were more than 97 percent. The chance of any one registrant being selected to donate is about 1 in 500.
My donor bore no costs and had full support for the time she missed for travel and appointments. She had to travel two hours by train and stay at a hotel — costs that were reimbursed, unlike what Rush implies. I am puzzled that Rush did not contact Be the Match’s donor support team or the donor center to better understand his opportunity to save a life. As my donor says, “I would do it again and again.” I’d be happy to introduce Rush to this amazing German college student so he can hear her perspective.
Lisa G. Korslund, Edina
• • •
It seems that Rush signed up to be a bone marrow donor in order to get some free pizza. I signed up because my youngest brother was diagnosed with leukemia and a marrow transplant was his only hope. We were all tested; none of us matched. We would have ransomed our souls to help Jeff, but thank the Lord for the Red Cross and the University of Minnesota hospitals: They found a nonrelated donor, a man who was caring and giving, one who wasn’t looking to be paid to help a person in need.
If we were to go forward with Rush’s suggestion, the rich could be offered the possibility of a cure while the poor were denied. Rush finishes with the comment that although he wants to move forward with the process, “the incentives just aren’t there.” Apparently not for him, but thankfully there are people in this world who are a bit more altruistic. My brother was only 29 when he died in 1986. I miss him everyday, and I’m waiting for that call that says, “We think you may be a match.”
Linda M. Felix, Minneapolis
A September date is better for participation
The Star Tribune Editorial Board draws exactly the wrong conclusion about low turnout at last Tuesday’s primary (“After poor turnout, move primary date,” Aug. 16).
After noting correctly that low turnout is damaging to democracy, and that Minnesotans are voting with their absence against August primaries, the Editorial Board wants to move primaries to June? Last time I checked, June was still summer vacation season, and it dumps primary campaigns into the active legislative session — so we could then mix low turnout with extra gridlock. Great!
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.