Readers Write: (June 2): Military intervention, India election, synthetic LSD, water safety, poaching

  • Updated: May 30, 2014 - 6:35 PM

Critics cited as Obama’s ‘straw men’ seem pretty real to me.


Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


Those who are skeptical deserve more credit

The Washington Post excerpt republished in a May 30 roundup of commentary responding to President Obama’s speech at West Point accuses the president of having thrown out straw men when he spoke of “those who ‘say that every problem has a military solution’ … and who think that ‘working through international institutions … or respecting international law is a sign of weakness.’ ” The Post claims that “few critics hold such views.”

I don’t know how “few” such critics are — the right-wing media seems to abound with them — but one for sure is Republican U.S. Sen. John McCain, who has called for overt military intervention in Syria, Iran, Libya, Nigeria, Kosovo, Bosnia and Ukraine, along with military support to overthrow regimes in North Korea and Sudan. He was also, of course, a major backer of the Iraq invasion of 2003, as were many of his colleagues on both sides of the aisle, perhaps the worst foreign policy debacle in this country’s history, and he supports prolonged war in Afghanistan, the “graveyard of empires.”

The president is right to set a high threshold for military intervention. History shows our professed aims are rarely achieved by force, and the consequences are invariably deadly for many tens of thousands. Active diplomatic engagement to avoid war when possible is not weakness, it is strength. It’s too bad if that doesn’t satisfy the need of certain adolescent male egos for validation. It’s time to grow up.

Stephen Lehman, St. Paul



No, not everyone is thrilled with the result

In response to the May 29 letter “India election: We are thrilled to have Modi,” this Minnesotan of the Indian diaspora begs to differ. The fact that only 31 percent of Indians voted for Narendra Modi’s political party was in itself painting a contrary picture.

Not everyone of Indian origin, either in Minnesota or elsewhere in the world, is thrilled about Modi’s election to lead such a richly diverse country. The entire nation is not so oblivious to the fact that Modi and his Hindu fundamentalist cohort perpetually besieged the rights of minorities in Gujarat State and of their successful efforts to wiggle out of their ways conveniently using a flawed judicial system.

Another important fact: Of the newly elected parliamentarians, 112 of them, or more than a fifth, have declared serious criminal cases registered against them, while 34 percent have criminal records. This, not the May 26 commentary to which the letter writer was responding (“Rather than embrace, be wary of India’s new leader”), is an insult and a mockery of the largest democracy on Earth.

Vincent Peters, New Brighton



Dealing it or doing it: not equally dangerous?

Here’s the scene: Six people. All are 17. Five are dealers. One ingests the drug and dies. Why are only the dealers being tried as adults (front page, May 29)? Why is the highly intelligent person who ingested the drug not also seen as an adult? Or why are they all not being tried as underage?

Sandra Wucher, Anoka

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters