Readers Write (May 21): Polystyrene, campaign finance, Art-A-Whirl, road etiquette, noisy lawn care, online scratch games

  • Updated: May 20, 2014 - 6:19 PM

Some of us are glad Minneapolis leaders want to make businesses environmentally responsible.

hide

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

STYROFOAM

It is a real, and lingering, problem

Styrofoam is not an imaginary problem. My husband and I have spent this spring picking Styrofoam out of Lake Harriet and off the banks of the Minnehaha Creek. We have been shocked to see how it breaks into tiny particles that cannot be picked up. These particles will not dissolve, and probably will be in our lakes for generations. In contrast to a May 20 commentary (“Minneapolis: City of lightweight leaders”), we applaud the Minneapolis City Council for its concern for our lakes and waterways.

Styrofoam is expensive and difficult to recycle. Minneapolis is trying to get residents to recycle cans and bottles; adding Styrofoam would add another enormous expense. Businesses that offer polystyrene cups and containers should be forced to offer and manage the recycling of these containers. Why does government need to be there to pick up the mess of business?

Rebecca Wardell Gaertner, Minneapolis

• • •

What Annette Meeks could have added to her commentary is that the oft-denigrated Chick-fil-A has been recycling its polystyrene cups (and most, if not all of its packaging and serving material) for a very long time.

It took me two separate weeks of garbage pickup to get rid of the Styrofoam used in packaging a recently purchased table saw, due to the bulk. With our regular household trash, there was not room in the large bin. Our church, in an effort to be conscientious about our environment, has been using cups for coffee and tea that are so ineffective that most people use two to avoid burning themselves. Meeks is right. We could use a facility around here.

Ken Slinde, Bloomington

 

CAMPAIGN FINANCE

Voting is personal; influence is public

A May 20 letter writer argued that if we do not deserve anonymity for campaign contributions, then, logically, neither should the votes we cast be private. The difference is that when you vote, you are not trying to influence how others vote, but when you spend $100 million, you are 100 percent trying to do so.

Michael Impagliazzo, Hastings

 

ART-A-WHIRL

I’d back artists on event’s evolution

I don’t keep up with social media, but I would imagine the artists’ comments about the changing face of the Art-A-Whirl mirror mine (“Festival or crawl? Does it matter, if we buy art?” Letter of the Day, May 20). I’d gone to the event and had spent plenty of money for years, but recently have skipped it because it has evolved from a showcase for the artists to a madhouse. I simply did not want to expend the necessary energy and time to get anywhere near the area anymore. The neighborhood businesses are riding on Art-A-Whirl’s coattails to promote their own events and agendas that have nothing to do with art appreciation. There are plenty of other weekends during which the bars, breweries and restaurants could come together and plan for their own festival.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close