How do the cartels move easily across the border, while the poor are caught and deported?
Border enforcement must be reprioritized
The March 23 report on the penetration of the Mexican cartels into the Twin Cities drug market (“Cartels pipe heroin, death to heartland”) was timely — if not overdue. A suburban student of mine was one of those heroin death statistics. The question that the article raises for me is: How do the cartels move so easily across the U.S. border, while the poor are caught and deported? Their only sin is to live in countries that don’t provide for their basic needs and want something more for their children. They aren’t the ones killing off our young people with $10 bags of poison.
Rosemary Ruffenach, St. Louis Park
‘Farm country’ isn’t as ‘OK’ as it appears
Looking at the world through rose-colored glasses can make people feel at ease, but reality is a stark black-and-white. Lee Schafer’s “Main Street looks lonely, but farm country’s OK” (March 23) paints a picture that shades over the reality of present life in rural America. With consolidation of landownership comes greater concentration of wealth. So, of course a median income will appear to look just fine, but Schafer overlooks the poverty rate of this area that sits at just over 10 percent.
It’s easy to say things are hunky-dory when you only interview a large-farm financial adviser and a director at a nearby tractor manufacturing plant. Schafer may have found a different tone had he interviewed some of the employees at that plant. This director boasts that two-thirds of his staff has some sort of experience with agriculture, but how many of these employees wish they were farming like their parents or grandparents had done?
I was born and raised and currently live and work in “farm country.” Over the years, I’ve gotten to know plenty of people whose dream is to farm but who feel the barriers are too great and therefore take less-than-fulfilling jobs. Rural America has had to adapt, but at what cost?
David Rosmann, Chatfield, Minn.
TALKING ABOUT POVERTY
The infamous ‘47%’ is mostly hard at work
In his March 23 column (“Ryan, taking on poverty, travels the razor’s edge”), D.J. Tice joins U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan and former presidential candidate Mitt Romney in addressing the “47 percent” of citizens who don’t pay federal income tax. Is this group primarily composed of welfare recipients, as Ryan and Tice imply?
Actually, less than 4 percent of the group are welfare recipients. That leaves about 43 percent who are working poor, many working multiple jobs yet still not earning enough to pay federal income tax. Ryan nonetheless proposes to fix the problem by gutting our welfare system.
A real solution would mandate a higher minimum wage on which a worker and his or her family could live with dignity and begin to contribute more to our tax coffers, to our economy and to their community. Due primarily to increased worker productivity, profit margins for American businesses are at record-high levels. It’s time to share some of those profits with the worker.
Joseph Ehrlich, Arden Hills
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.