Changing the printing process could address the growing threat of plastic guns.
Politicians need to act on plastic gun solutions
You are absolutely correct that Congress needs to address the threat of plastic guns posed by 3-D printing (“Renew and expand law on plastic guns,” Dec. 3 editorial).
The partial solution, I believe, would be to require the incorporation of radiopaque (X-ray blocking) additives in all feedstock used for 3-D printing. Because much of this feedstock is produced overseas (China, particularly), there would need to be stiff penalties involved for importing non-radiopaque feedstock. The cost of these additives would be relatively low and could be passed on to the 3-D printer users.
Additionally, if the plastics used by other manufacturers of plastic guns also included radiopaque, this would help solve the problem of people removing the currently required metal piece. Radiopaque additives, unfortunately, would not make guns detectable by metal detectors, but they would at least prevent their inclusion in carry-on baggage. Other security measures would still be needed for guns carried on the body, but metal detectors could probably detect the ammunition.
david coats, Minneapolis
• • •
As I celebrate this holiday season, I think about the losses in Newtown, Conn., and the nearly eight children who die from guns every day in our country. I also think about the lack of post-Newtown action by our state legislators and Congress.
What will it take to turn this around so that public safety for all rises to the top of our political agenda? How do we get the attention of elected officials who care more about their big donors than the safety of our children? I, for one, have joined with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America to work for common-sense gun laws — something we can all live with.
While those of us who support common-sense gun laws enjoy a majority status in our country, it takes an organized effort to be heard in our capitals. As a mom, I will not be silent. On Dec. 14, I will be ringing bells in solidarity with other moms across the country to honor the victims of gun violence and their families.
Linda winsor, St. Paul
List doesn’t absolve those who knew before
During my stint as a public schoolteacher, I was obligated by law to make authorities aware of any suspected child abuse. Not doing so could/should have cost me my job.
Now that the list of accused clergy has been made public (“Abusers in Catholic church revealed,” Dec. 6), those in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis who did not report what they knew should resign or be dismissed.
The abusing priests are not the only ones who are guilty. The church personnel who transferred abusing priests, ignored the pleas of the victims, failed to cooperate fully with law enforcement officials and did not live up to the very words they preach are as guilty as the abusing priests.
Making the list public does not and should not absolve them of their roles as accessories to the crimes allegedly committed by those on the list.
GEORGE LARSON, Minneapolis
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.