Letter of the Day (Oct. 16): Road caution signs

  • Updated: October 15, 2013 - 6:45 PM

It’s not good policy to remove deer-crossing and children-at-play signs.

hide

Photo: KEITH SRAKOCIC, ASSOCIATED PRESS

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The Minnesota Department of Transportation and some county administrators are dismissing the adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” by suggesting that there is no data to prove the effectiveness of deer-crossing and children-at-play signs (“Warning: Safety sign ahead may not be doing its job,” Oct. 12).

On a dark, wet road with leaves along the curb, when a driver (local or visiting) sees the sign and then swerves to avoid hitting a deer, how and to whom is he or she supposed to deliver data?

Parents are as concerned as ever about the safety of their children. Something in the history of a neighborhood prompted a local decision to put a sign up. Has any child been hit since?

In my work, I meet with people who have been injured in motor vehicle/motorcycle accidents. Most accidents can be prevented, and awareness of road conditions is an important mind-set for every driver. The cost of health care is skyrocketing, as are vehicle insurance premiums. Good road signage helps keep both down.

RICHARD SCHROEDER, White Bear Lake

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close