Readers Write (Sept. 8): Mining proposal, military draft, female graduates, students, Syria

  • Updated: September 7, 2013 - 6:00 PM

Illustration: Mailbox.

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


It’s not about Ely: It’s about Minnesota

The Sept. 1 commentary about the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, Ely and mining (“You think you know Ely’s needs?”) was filled with hollow presumptions as to why a mining project should proceed. The writer based much of his argument on the idea that his proximity to the BWCA somehow gives his opinion more value. As Minnesotans, the protection of our natural heritage shouldn’t be based on proximity or individual usage. Even if I never go to the BWCA, I’d still like to see its unique, relatively pristine setting protected. Much of the argument was designed to paint metro-area citizens as bumbling interlopers on the affairs of the BWCA. The reality is that the park belongs to all Minnesotans.


• • •

After the way corporate America has taken care of the environment, it’s hard to believe it won’t spoil the water and pollute the land. Fly over Lake Erie and look at the pollution. The gold mines on Rainy Lake still have piles of tailings visible. One has to fly over the Iron Range to see the scope of how the Earth was changed.

How many times have we heard from those in corporate America that we must give them what they want or they’ll leave? From Mayo to Hormel, they only look at the bottom line. We who love the lakes and rocks don’t care if tourism is off. We will be here on the water and ice even if there is no work.

JIM GOUDY, Ranier, Minn.

• • •



Debate, yes, but don’t insult veterans

I agree with most of Bonnie Blodgett’s Sept. 1 commentary (“A draft may be crucial to democracy”). I, too, believe that “compulsory military service in times of war” is essential to our nation’s existence. She’s right about the glaring demographic contrast in who serves in our military, which is “disproportionately composed of minorities and the poor.” But her discussion doesn’t go far enough, because reinstating the draft as we currently know it would disproportionately exclude half of the age-eligible population.

The all-male draft is a remnant of an old era. If a draft is potentially reinstated, we need to address the role of female troops. With both a son and a daughter who would be of draft-eligible age, I have mixed feelings. Yet, if we don’t require females to register for Selective Service at age 18 as we do males, we all have to ask ourselves why.

BRAD BURKE, Woodbury

• • •

Blodgett should be a little more careful in her choice of words. Describing Vietnam-era troops as “riffraff” is unacceptable and condescending to the 58,000 dead and 210,000 wounded soldiers of that conflict.


  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters