Don’t trust Enbridge on promise of jobs
An Aug. 23 story gives the idea that a new pipeline through Minnesota would employ as many as 3,000 workers in Minnesota and North Dakota during construction. Union leaders say they support the project. I would like more detail.
According to another article, on July 27, Enbridge was fined $425,000 to settle allegations of illegally dumping water into Minnesota wetlands and rivers while it was testing pipelines. Enbridge does not seem like a company I could put great trust in.
What does “up to 3,000” workers mean? It could be any number from 1 to 3,000. Pipeline companies should know the labor costs of a project. They should be able to give a close figure of how many workers it will take. They should also be able to tell how long these people will be employed. Is it a one-year project or longer? Where will these workers be from? Will Enbridge bring in workers from Canada, or will all of the workers be from Minnesota and North Dakota? I suggest we keep a close eye on things.
JUDITH MOORE, St. Louis Park
* * *
Don’t trust airgun blasts in the ocean
The Department of the Interior is considering allowing seismic airgun testing for oil and gas in the Atlantic Ocean — from Delaware to Florida. This testing involves sending loud blasts of compressed air toward the ocean floor every 10 seconds for days to weeks on end in search of oil and gas deposits.
Worse, the blasts can permanently deafen dolphins and whales and will mask the sounds these animals need to communicate and find food. It’s estimated that seismic airgun testing in the Atlantic could injure or kill 138,500 marine mammals. The noise could drive away fish, hurting East Coast fisheries and coastal economies. The testing also threatens the survival of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales, whose nursery lies on the edge of the testing zone.
If offshore oil drilling follows these tests, the Atlantic coast will be at risk of a disaster like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
GEOFFREY SAIGN, St. Paul
* * *
Don’t trust Obama on foreign policy
President Obama’s words mean nothing. Last year, he said that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would mean a “red line” situation, requiring a U.S. response. Well, President Assad, the mini Adolf Hitler of Syria, launched a chemical attack anyway, killing hundreds. And the reaction of President Obama? Nothing. Unless you count several speeches telling Assad not to do it again, giving him another “red line” warning.
Now comes word that Assad’s thugs launched another chemical attack this week — this time, using a nerve agent, the deadliest chemical weapon available — killing 1,100 and leaving hundreds of victims gasping for breath in makeshift hospitals.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.