Readers Write (June 12): Trayvon Martin, NSA, Burger King hero

  • Updated: June 11, 2013 - 7:20 PM

Illustration: Mailbox.

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


A distorted picture in defense of the shooter

Wonderful that you found a former state and federal prosecutor from Philadelphia, so far north of Florida, who nonetheless knows just what happened the night George Zimmerman shot an unarmed Trayvon Martin to death (“The Trayvon Martin case, take two,” June 10.)

Commentary writer George Parry is also quite the lawyer, creating a “cowardly” prosecutor’s cartoon of Zimmerman (as crazed murderer), in order to make it seem silly that Zimmerman could actually have been at fault in the case, which has not yet gone to trial.

Parry’s bold conclusion? That Zimmerman did shoot Martin, but was so innocent, that only “media-spawned hysteria” could have brought him to trial. Poor gun-toting Zimmerman, whom Parry concludes is the victim of a “lynch-mob frenzy.” Not a word in the article about the unarmed young black man who ended up dead because Zimmerman shot him.

Frieda Gardner, Minneapolis

• • •

Congratulations, Star Tribune. You have figured out how to turn a stalker who attacks someone into the victim. If a strange man followed a woman in his car, got out to chase and accost her, and then shot her when she fought back, no one would think twice about considering it murder. But when a man does that to a young black man in a hoodie, somehow his actions magically become self-defense rather than violent aggression. Bravo, Star Tribune. Bravo.

Nate Swenson, Minneapolis

* * *


He broke his pledge to the American people

Edward Snowden is controversial and big news. More of us support the NSA’s activities than oppose them, but Snowden took it upon himself to reveal secrets he swore to protect as a condition of his employment. He thereby put Americans and others at risk. He followed this by leaving the country and seeking asylum in Hong Kong to avoid prosecution and probably severe penalties. He has many supporters, including Ron Paul.

Other supporters, no surprise, include fellow abusers of security clearances, typically in hiding in other countries. All seem to share Snowden’s arrogance and narcissism. One observer concludes that Snowden was not properly vetted. This seems incontrovertible. How was his top secret clearance established? He should have been given personality tests and given a background investigation, at a minimum. And he was making $200,000. Not bad for a man without a high school diploma.

Rodney E. Johnson, Minneapolis

• • •

It seems odd to me that a recent letter writer advocated on behalf of government agencies that sift huge volumes of data generated by U.S. citizens who have done absolutely nothing wrong on the off chance that they will uncover a nugget of useful information regarding terrorism. Benjamin Franklin states the case far better than can I: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Brad Dimond, Richfield

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters