Letter of the Day (March 31): Xcel's nuclear lapse

  • Updated: March 30, 2013 - 5:03 PM
hide

The Xcel Energy Prairie Island Nuclear Plant north of Red Wing.

Photo: Glen Stubbe, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

We’ve been paying the extra monthly amount for wind energy development ever since the program started, so I’m concerned about the Xcel repair delay on a nuclear leak detector (“Xcel chided for nuclear plant lapse,” March 28).

I’m sorry to say that we signed on to the wind energy program hoping that’s what the money was really going for. Few people realize that their property insurance will not pay for damages caused by a nuclear power plant disaster.

So why are we still focused on such a dangerous energy source? For that matter, why does the media instead fixate on the danger to birds from wind-generator blades? Why do most of us know nothing of the government being the main insurer for nuclear-power-related disasters?

I suspect a life or health insurance policy for a few birds would cost a lot less than caring for thousands of people harmed by power plant leaks.

LARRY JOHNSON, Golden Valley

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close