Previous Page 2 of 3 Next

Continued: Readers Write (March 22): DFL tax plans, workplace, child care unions, ethics, volunteers

  • Article by:
  • Last update: March 21, 2013 - 7:09 PM

* * *


Child care workers have little to gain

As the owner of an in-home child care business, I oppose the unionization of Minnesota family child care providers. State Rep. Michael Nelson, the Democratic author of a bill (HF950) to authorize it, has given three reasons he believes in union control:

1) A union will increase Child Care Assistance Program payments. But the House, Senate and governor can increase CCAP payments any time they choose. A union doesn’t need to be forced on us for it to happen.

2) A union would provide more and better educational opportunities for providers. Abundant training is already available through local groups, county and state conferences, support organizations, colleges, and technical schools. All training is approved by the state Department of Human Services.

3) A union will make it possible for providers to keep control of their businesses. I’ve been doing just fine without union help for almost 30 years. I set my own rates, determine my hours, and write my own policies and contracts. I’m a business owner. Unions were designed for employees.

Senate President Sandy Pappas said that if providers don’t want to be part of the union, they can choose not to accept families on CCAP. Therefore, a bill meant to increase benefits for CCAP recipients will ironically reduce options for low-income families.

If unionization is successful, other small businesses will soon be affected. The unions are starting with small businesses and will move on to bigger prey. We need to stop this power play.

Terry Gervais, Bloomington

* * *

Acting dubiously

There’s ‘ethical,’ and then there’s ethical

Former Minneapolis City Council Member Steve Minn may not have violated any “written” ethics rules (March 20), but how about the “unwritten” ones? The use of pseudonyms in an attempt to “derail a business rival’s projects at City Hall” and “use of fake identities to e-mail city officials and make online postings” would certainly fit in the category of “unwritten” rules.

Andy Pakalns, St. Paul

* * *

Acting admirably

May this example encourage others

  • related content

  • Illustration: Mailbox.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters