Letter of the day (Sept. 17): Sports and art

  • Updated: September 17, 2012 - 8:53 AM

They're not mutually exclusive in value.


The Packers’ Aaron Rodgers (12) and the Vikings’ Jared Allen (69): If that’s what moves you, it’s a valid experience.

Photo: Carlos Gonzalez, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Let me start out with full disclosure: I am an actor/filmmaker -- an "artist," if you will (though my Scandinavian upbringing makes me cringe at such a self-description). I am a strong believer in public support of the arts.

That said, I must raise my objection to the constant raising of sports as the bogeyman in discussions of what should or should not be supported and funded in our society. Sports and art tap into the same place in the human psyche: the place where hope, ambition, inspiration and exultation meet for a transformative moment.

The thrill that Person A feels at watching Jared Allen blind-side Aaron Rodgers is no less or more valid than the thrill in the heart of Person B who watches Hamlet finally kill Claudius.

Yes, pro athletes make a lot of money, but so do movie stars. I am certainly not begrudging the artist musicians their money -- they should probably make more -- but make the argument about the value they provide rather than denigrating the passion and pleasure that sports also provide.


  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters