Letter of the day: Is it Act 2 for the Minnesota smoking ban?

Last update: February 16, 2008 - 4:51 PM

I applaud the efforts of Mark Benjamin in exploiting a loophole in the law banning smoking in the bar. Granted, most logical and sane people understand that smoking is bad for your health ("To smoke or not to smoke? Barroom thespians find the play's the thing," Feb. 15). Yet we live in a land where business owners can offer a service or a product to the public as long as it is legal. And tobacco is a legal product to grow, sell and use.

The only argument for the ban, which does not hold water, is the right of the nonsmoker to visit these establishments with the expectation of a smoke-free environment. The debate over smokers' and nonsmokers' rights has no clear winner. The banning of smoking has created hardship on property owners who offer services that have allowed smoking in the past.

The Legislature and governor should repeal the smoking ban and replace it with incentives for smokeless restaurants and bars; they should also require bars and restaurants to clearly display whether or not they allow smoking. There is nothing illegal about smoking tobacco. Placing restrictions on business owners and home owners as to what they can and cannot have take place -- legal activities, within their walls -- removes the basic rights of all Americans to live free and pursue happiness.

CHRIS LUND, HAMBURG

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS